World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
76
Citations
21157
World Ranking
1920
National Ranking
919

Fahmeed Hyder publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fahmeed Hyder sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 313 publications — 84th percentile

84% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Fahmeed Hyder D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Fahmeed Hyder sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Fahmeed Hyder is affiliated with Yale University in the United States and focuses primarily on research within the fields of Medicine and Neuroscience. Their work spans several subfields including Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Cognitive Neuroscience, Molecular Biology, Neurology, and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience.

Their research addresses a variety of topics related to brain function and medical imaging. Principal areas of study include Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications, Functional Brain Connectivity Studies, Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications, Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms, Neural Dynamics and Brain Function, Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism, as well as Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research.

Several recent papers illustrate the scope of their research efforts:

  • Simultaneous cortex-wide fluorescence Ca2+ imaging and whole-brain fMRI, 2020, Nature Methods
  • Manganese Ferrite Nanoparticles (MnFe2O4): Size Dependence for Hyperthermia and Negative/Positive Contrast Enhancement in MRI, 2020, Nanomaterials
  • Renal plasticity revealed through reversal of polycystic kidney disease in mice, 2021, Nature Genetics
  • VEGF-C prophylaxis favors lymphatic drainage and modulates neuroinflammation in a stroke model, 2024, The Journal of Experimental Medicine
  • Brain-targeting, acid-responsive antioxidant nanoparticles for stroke treatment and drug delivery, 2022, Bioactive Materials

Hyder frequently publishes in a selection of scientific venues, including:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition
  • Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism
  • NMR in Biomedicine
  • Stroke

Their collaborative work involves recurring partnerships with multiple researchers, including:

  • Daniel Coman
  • Basavaraju G. Sanganahalli
  • Péter Hermán
  • Sandeep K. Mishra
  • Jelena Mihailović

Best Publications

  • Engineering of human brain organoids with a functional vascular-like system

    Bilal Cakir;Yangfei Xiang;Yoshiaki Tanaka;Mehmet Hamdi Kural

  • Reduced Cortical γ-Aminobutyric Acid Levels in Depressed Patients Determined by Proton Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy

    Gerard Sanacora;Graeme F. Mason;Douglas L. Rothman;Kevin L. Behar

  • Energetic basis of brain activity: implications for neuroimaging

    Robert G Shulman;Douglas L Rothman;Kevin L Behar;Fahmeed Hyder

  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human prefrontal cortex activation during a spatial working memory task

    Gregory McCarthy;Andrew M. Blamire;Aina Puce;Anna C. Nobre

  • Increased cortical GABA concentrations in depressed patients receiving ECT.

    Gerard Sanacora;Graeme F. Mason;Douglas L. Rothman;Fahmeed Hyder

  • Dynamic mapping of the human visual cortex by high-speed magnetic resonance imaging

    A M Blamire;S Ogawa;K Ugurbil;D Rothman

  • Neuronal–Glial Glucose Oxidation and Glutamatergic–GABAergic Function

    Fahmeed Hyder;Anant B Patel;Albert Gjedde;Douglas L Rothman

  • Cerebral energetics and the glycogen shunt: neurochemical basis of functional imaging.

    Robert G. Shulman;Fahmeed Hyder;Douglas L. Rothman

  • In vivo NMR Studies of the Glutamate Neurotransmitter Flux and Neuroenergetics: Implications for Brain Function

    Douglas L Rothman;Kevin L Behar;Fahmeed Hyder;Robert G Shulman

  • Cerebral energetics and spiking frequency: The neurophysiological basis of fMRI

    Arien J. Smith;Hal Blumenfeld;Kevin L. Behar;Douglas L. Rothman

  • FMRI of the prefrontal cortex during overt verbal fluency

    Elizabeth A. Phelps;Fahmeed Hyder;Andrew M. Blamire;Robert G. Shulman

  • Quantitative functional imaging of the brain: towards mapping neuronal activity by BOLD fMRI.

    Fahmeed Hyder;Ikuhiro Kida;Kevin L. Behar;Richard P. Kennan

  • Cortical energy demands of signaling and nonsignaling components in brain are conserved across mammalian species and activity levels

    Fahmeed Hyder;Douglas L. Rothman;Maxwell R. Bennett

  • Negative BOLD with Large Increases in Neuronal Activity

    Ulrich Schridde;Manjula Khubchandani;Joshua E. Motelow;Basavaraju G. Sanganahalli

  • In vivo nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy studies of the relationship between the glutamate-glutamine neurotransmitter cycle and functional neuroenergetics.

    Douglas L. Rothman;Nicola R. Sibson;Fahmeed Hyder;Jun Shen

  • Intranasal epidermal growth factor treatment rescues neonatal brain injury

    Joseph Scafidi;Timothy R. Hammond;Susanna Scafidi;Jonathan Ritter

  • Total neuroenergetics support localized brain activity: Implications for the interpretation of fMRI

    Fahmeed Hyder;Douglas L. Rothman;Robert G. Shulman

  • Simultaneous activation of mouse main and accessory olfactory bulbs by odors or pheromones

    Fuqiang Xu;Michele Schaefer;Ikuhiro Kida;James Schafer

  • A model for the regulation of cerebral oxygen delivery

    Fahmeed Hyder;Robert G. Shulman;Douglas L. Rothman

  • Odor maps of aldehydes and esters revealed by functional MRI in the glomerular layer of the mouse olfactory bulb.

    Fuqiang Xu;Nian Liu;Ikuhiro Kida;Douglas L. Rothman

  • Erythrocyte efferocytosis modulates macrophages towards recovery after intracerebral hemorrhage

    Che-Feng Chang;Brittany A. Goods;Michael H. Askenase;Matthew D. Hammond

Frequent Co-Authors

Douglas L. Rothman
Douglas L. Rothman Yale University
Robert G. Shulman
Robert G. Shulman Yale University
Hal Blumenfeld
Hal Blumenfeld Yale University
Kevin L. Behar
Kevin L. Behar Yale University
Ognen A. C. Petroff
Ognen A. C. Petroff Yale University
Richard H. Mattson
Richard H. Mattson Yale University
Graeme F. Mason
Graeme F. Mason Yale University
Gordon M. Shepherd
Gordon M. Shepherd Yale School of Medicine
Albert Gjedde
Albert Gjedde University of Copenhagen
Andrew M. Blamire
Andrew M. Blamire Newcastle University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Fahmeed Hyder

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles