World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 49 2951 2704 1431 1292 195 9689

Julia Adler-Milstein publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julia Adler-Milstein between 2005 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julia Adler-Milstein published across 21 years, from 2005 to 2025, averaging 13.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2020. 48 of the 284 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2020. 2005: 3 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 5 publications 2008: 3 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 9 publications 2014: 16 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 26 publications 2020: 28 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 26 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 27 publications 2025: 21 publications
2005 2025

284 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julia Adler-Milstein: publications per year, 2005 to 2025
Year Publications
2005 3
2006 1
2007 5
2008 3
2009 4
2010 2
2011 8
2012 3
2013 9
2014 16
2015 7
2016 18
2017 19
2018 19
2019 26
2020 28
2021 22
2022 26
2023 17
2024 27
2025 21
Total 284
Download as CSV

Julia Adler-Milstein publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia Adler-Milstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 194–203 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 195 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304 195
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Julia Adler-Milstein D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia Adler-Milstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186 49
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)

Overview

Julia Adler-Milstein is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research spans multiple topics within health professions and medicine, with particular focus in the subfields of general health professions, health information management, public health, environmental and occupational health, organizational behavior and human resource management, and economics and econometrics.

Their scholarly work covers a number of main topics:

  • Electronic Health Records Systems
  • Healthcare Systems and Technology
  • Primary Care and Health Outcomes
  • Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation

Frequently, their research has been published in the following venues:

  • Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • JAMA
  • JAMA Network Open
  • Applied Clinical Informatics
  • Journal of General Internal Medicine

A selection of recent papers illustrates their focus and research contributions:

  • Factors and reasons associated with low COVID-19 vaccine uptake among highly hesitant communities in the US, 2022, American Journal of Infection Control
  • Documentation and review of social determinants of health data in the EHR: measures and associated insights, 2021, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Studying Workflow and Workarounds in Electronic Health Record-Supported Work to Improve Health System Performance, 2020, Annals of Internal Medicine
  • Associations of physician burnout with organizational electronic health record support and after-hours charting, 2021, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
  • Patient characteristics associated with objective measures of digital health tool use in the United States: A literature review, 2020, Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Julia Adler-Milstein has collaborated frequently with several coauthors:

  • A Jay Holmgren (19 publications)
  • Jordan Everson (15 publications)
  • Nate C. Apathy (11 publications)
  • Robert Thombley (10 publications)
  • Matthew S. Pantell (9 publications)

In 2019, they were recognized as a Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM).

Best Publications

  • The value of health care information exchange and interoperability.

    Jan Walker;Eric Pan;Douglas Johnston;Julia Adler-Milstein

  • Electronic health record adoption in US hospitals: the emergence of a digital "advanced use" divide.

    Julia Adler-Milstein;A Jay Holmgren;Peter Kralovec;Chantal Worzala

  • HITECH Act Drove Large Gains In Hospital Electronic Health Record Adoption

    Julia Adler-Milstein;Ashish K. Jha

  • Despite Substantial Progress In EHR Adoption, Health Information Exchange And Patient Engagement Remain Low In Office Settings

    Michael F. Furukawa;Jennifer King;Vaishali Patel;Chun Ju Hsiao

  • Electronic Health Record Adoption in US Hospitals: Progress Continues, But Challenges Persist

    Julia Adler-Milstein;Catherine M. DesRoches;Peter Kralovec;Gregory Foster

  • Telehealth Among US Hospitals: Several Factors, Including State Reimbursement And Licensure Policies, Influence Adoption

    Julia Adler-Milstein;Joseph Kvedar;David W. Bates

  • More Than Half of US Hospitals Have At Least A Basic EHR, But Stage 2 Criteria Remain Challenging For Most

    Julia Adler-Milstein;Catherine M. DesRoches;Michael F. Furukawa;Chantal Worzala

  • Health Information Exchange Among US Hospitals

    Julia Adler-Milstein;Catherine M. DesRoches;Ashish K. Jha

  • U.S. Regional Health Information Organizations: Progress And Challenges

    Julia Adler-Milstein;David W. Bates;Ashish K. Jha

  • Factors and reasons associated with low COVID-19 vaccine uptake among highly hesitant communities in the US

    Unknown

  • A survey of health information exchange organizations in the united states: Implications for meaningful use

    Julia Adler-Milstein;David W. Bates;Ashish K. Jha

  • Health information exchange associated with improved emergency department care through faster accessing of patient information from outside organizations.

    Jordan Everson;Keith E Kocher;Julia Adler-Milstein

  • Operational Health Information Exchanges Show Substantial Growth, But Long-Term Funding Remains A Concern

    Julia Adler-Milstein;David W. Bates;Ashish K. Jha

  • EHR Adoption and Hospital Performance: Time-Related Effects.

    Julia Adler-Milstein;Jordan Everson;Shoou Yih D Lee

  • The Impact of Privacy Regulation and Technology Incentives: The Case of Health Information Exchanges

    Idris Adjerid;Alessandro Acquisti;Rahul Telang;Rema Padman

  • Paperless healthcare: Progress and challenges of an IT-enabled healthcare system

    Julia Rose Adler-Milstein;David Bates

  • Metrics for assessing physician activity using electronic health record log data

    Christine A Sinsky;Adam Rule;Genna Cohen;Brian G Arndt

  • The State Of Regional Health Information Organizations: Current Activities And Financing

    Julia Adler-Milstein;Andrew P. McAfee;David W. Bates;Ashish K. Jha

  • Benefits of Information Technology–Enabled Diabetes Management

    Davis Bu;Eric Pan;Janice Walker;Julia Adler-Milstein

  • Does health information exchange reduce redundant imaging? Evidence from emergency departments.

    Eric J. Lammers;Julia Adler-Milstein;Keith E. Kocher

  • MarketW atch The Value Of Health Care Information Exchange And Interoperability

    Jan Walker;Eric Pan;Douglas Johnston;Julia Adler-Milstein

  • U.S. Regional Health Information Organizations: Progress And Challenges Despite progress toward nationwide health information exchange, many RHIOs are pessimistic about their future.

    Julia Adler-Milstein;David W. Bates;Ashish K. Jha

Frequent Co-Authors

Ashish K. Jha
Ashish K. Jha Brown University
David W. Bates
David W. Bates Brigham and Women's Hospital
Catherine M. DesRoches
Catherine M. DesRoches Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Andrew M. Ryan
Andrew M. Ryan University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Blackford Middleton
Blackford Middleton Harvard University
Sara J. Singer
Sara J. Singer Stanford University
Michael W. Toffel
Michael W. Toffel Harvard University
Alessandro Acquisti
Alessandro Acquisti Carnegie Mellon University
Charles P. Friedman
Charles P. Friedman University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Rahul Telang
Rahul Telang Carnegie Mellon University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a variety of impactful careers. Today, there are more options than ever for advancing your education online, allowing greater flexibility and accessibility.

For those interested in clinical practice or counseling, consider earning your part time psyd degree online. This path is ideal for working professionals seeking licensure and clinical expertise. Alternatively, if you are aiming to specialize in couples and family counseling, there are accelerated marriage and family therapy programs that enable you to become qualified faster, without sacrificing quality.

Cost is often a key concern, but you can find an online masters in clinical psychology that is both affordable and respected by employers. For those hoping to advance into academic or leadership roles, a fastest edd program online may provide the quickest route to doctoral credentials and broader career opportunities.

Each of these programs offers flexible pathways, letting you continue working or managing other commitments while pursuing your educational and professional goals in the social sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Julia Adler-Milstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles