World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
5893
World Ranking
9385
National Ranking
290

Jane Hunter publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Hunter sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 221 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jane Hunter D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jane Hunter sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Jane Hunter is affiliated with the University of Technology Sydney in Australia. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Medicine and Environmental Science. Within these areas, Hunter has contributed notably to Surgery, Water Science and Technology, Ecology, and Developmental Biology.

Hunter's work explores several key topics, which include:

  • Water Quality Monitoring Technologies
  • Marine animal studies overview
  • Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior
  • Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes
  • Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
  • Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty

Two recent papers authored or coauthored by Hunter demonstrate their research interests and publication activity. These are:

  • "Machine learning approaches for identifying prey handling activity in otariid pinnipeds," 2020, published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "USING UNSUPERVISED MACHINE LEARNING TO PREDICT QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER TOTAL KNEE ARTHROPLASTY," 2025, published in Orthopaedic Proceedings

Hunter collaborates with a group of frequent coauthors, which includes:

  • Rita Pucci
  • Alessio Micheli
  • Stefano Chessa
  • Fazlollah Soleymani
  • Herna L. Viktor

Their publications have appeared primarily in arXiv (Cornell University) and Orthopaedic Proceedings, indicating engagement with venues in both open-access and orthopaedic specialized contexts.

Best Publications

  • Adding Multimedia to the SemanticWeb: Building and Applying an MPEG‐7 Ontology

    Jane Hunter

  • Adding multimedia to the semantic web: building an MPEG-7 ontology

    Jane Hunter

  • The ABC Ontology and Model

    Carl Lagoze;Jane Hunter

  • Towards a Core Ontology for Information Integration

    Martin Doerr;Jane Hunter;Carl Lagoze

  • Enhancing the semantic interoperability of multimedia through a core ontology

    J. Hunter

  • Assessing the quality and trustworthiness of citizen science data

    Jane Hunter;Abdulmonem Alabri;Catharine van Ingen

  • Vannotea: A collaborative video indexing, annotation and discussion system for broadband networks

    Ronald Schroeter;Jane Hunter;Douglas Kosovic

  • Combining RDF and XML schemas to enhance interoperability between metadata application profiles

    Jane Hunter;Carl Lagoze

  • An overview of the MPEG-7 description definition language (DDL)

    J. Hunter

  • The role of information technologies in indigenous knowledge management

    Jane Hunter

  • MetaNet: a metadata term thesaurus to enable semantic interoperability between metadata domains

    Jane Hunter

  • Post-Publication Peer Review: Opening Up Scientific Conversation

    Jane Hunter

  • Enhancing the Quality and Trust of Citizen Science Data

    Abdulmonem Alabri;Jane Hunter

  • Dynamic Generation of Intelligent Multimedia Presentations through Semantic Inferencing

    Suzanne Little;Joost Geurts;Jane Hunter

  • PANIC: an integrated approach to the preservation of composite digital objects using Semantic Web services

    Jane Hunter;Sharmin Choudhury

  • Open Annotation Data Model

    Robert Sanderson;Paolo Ciccarese;Herbert Van de Sompel;Shannon Bradshaw

  • Combining the CIDOC CRM and MPEG-7 to Describe Multimedia in Museums.

    Jane Hunter

  • Evaluating the application of semantic inferencing rules to image annotation

    L. Hollink;S. Little;J. Hunter

  • Creating a behavioural classification module for acceleration data: Using a captive surrogate for difficult to observe species

    Hamish A. Campbell;Lianli Gao;Owen R. Bidder;Jane Hunter

  • Identifying scientific artefacts in biomedical literature

    Hamed Hassanzadeh;Tudor Groza;Jane Hunter

  • Realizing the hydrogen economy through Semantic Web technologies

    J. Hunter;J. Drennan;S. Little

  • A comparison of schemas for video metadata representation

    Jane Hunter;Liz Armstrong

Frequent Co-Authors

John Drennan
John Drennan University of Queensland
Lianli Gao
Lianli Gao University of Electronic Science and Technology of China
Carl Lagoze
Carl Lagoze University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Craig E. Franklin
Craig E. Franklin University of Queensland
Bostjan Kobe
Bostjan Kobe University of Queensland
Herbert Van de Sompel
Herbert Van de Sompel Ghent University
Jennifer L. Martin
Jennifer L. Martin University of Wollongong
Mark A. Ragan
Mark A. Ragan University of Queensland
Ashley M. Buckle
Ashley M. Buckle Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Computer Science opens doors to a variety of online education options. For those eager to advance quickly, exploring the quickest masters degree online can help you fast-track your skills and return to the workforce sooner. Many of these accelerated pathways are tailored for professionals seeking specialized roles.

If career versatility and demand are priorities, research programs listed among the most useful masters degrees. These degrees offer high ROI and are aligned with the evolving needs of today’s technology job market.

Not ready to commit to a full bachelor’s or master’s degree? An online associate's degree in computer science or IT can provide essential foundational knowledge and entry-level career opportunities. This is a cost-effective way to start your journey or pivot into tech.

Finally, affordability remains a concern for many prospective students. Discover the most affordable online colleges to ensure you find a program that fits your budget without compromising on quality.

Best Scientists Citing Jane Hunter

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles