World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 38 10277 9989 643 635 199 5790

Ian Ruthven publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ian Ruthven between 1973 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ian Ruthven published across 53 years, from 1973 to 2025, averaging 4.7 papers a year. Output peaked at 23 publications in 2022. 26 of the 247 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1973 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 23. Peak 23 publications in 2022. 1973: 1 publication 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 5 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 7 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 13 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 13 publications 2006: 9 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 14 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 5 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 10 publications 2020: 2 publications 2021: 8 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 15 publications 2025: 11 publications
1973 2025

247 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ian Ruthven: publications per year, 1973 to 2025
Year Publications
1973 1
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 5
1996 5
1997 1
1998 1
1999 7
2000 2
2001 3
2002 13
2003 15
2004 2
2005 13
2006 9
2007 9
2008 13
2009 4
2010 18
2011 14
2012 9
2013 4
2014 5
2015 5
2016 7
2017 3
2018 9
2019 10
2020 2
2021 8
2022 23
2023 1
2024 15
2025 11
Total 247
Download as CSV

Ian Ruthven publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian Ruthven sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 192–201 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 199 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519 199
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Ian Ruthven D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ian Ruthven sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968 38
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ian Ruthven is affiliated with the University of Strathclyde in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily falls within the social sciences, with a focus on sociology and political science, communication, philosophy, information systems, and health as key subfields.

Their recent publications demonstrate engagement with topics related to information behavior and information science. These include:

  • An information behavior theory of transitions (2021), published in the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
  • Resonance and the experience of relevance (2020), published in the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology

Ian Ruthven frequently publishes in journals such as the Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, Journal of Documentation, and Information Research an international electronic journal, among others.

Their research covers a range of topics, including:

  • Media, Religion, Digital Communication
  • Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
  • Misinformation and Its Impacts
  • Library Science and Administration
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Technology Use by Older Adults
  • Information Retrieval and Search Behavior

Co-authorship is an important aspect of their work. Frequent collaborators include Alison Hicks, Pamela J. McKenzie, Jenny Bronstein, Jette Seiden Hyldegård, and Gunilla Widén, each having co-authored multiple papers.

Ian Ruthven's work has appeared in publication venues such as:

  • Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology
  • Journal of Documentation
  • Information Research an international electronic journal
  • Proceedings of the Association for Information Science and Technology
  • Journal of Librarianship and Information Science

Among their notable research outputs are studies examining information behavior transitions and the experience of relevance within information science contexts. Their contributions align with their broader interests in how individuals and groups interact with information systems and media.

Best Publications

  • A survey on the use of relevance feedback for information access systems

    Ian Ruthven;Mounia Lalmas

  • Re-examining the potential effectiveness of interactive query expansion

    Ian Ruthven

  • How users assess web pages for information seeking

    Anastasios Tombros;Ian Ruthven;Joemon M. Jose

  • A classification scheme for content analyses of YouTube video comments

    Amy Madden;Ian Ruthven;David McMenemy

  • A task-oriented study on the influencing effects of query-biased summarisation in web searching

    Ryen W. White;Joemon M. Jose;Ian Ruthven

  • Towards task-based personal information management evaluations

    David Elsweiler;Ian Ruthven

  • Evaluating implicit feedback models using searcher simulations

    Ryen W. White;Ian Ruthven;Joemon M. Jose;C. J. Van Rijsbergen

  • Finding relevant documents using top ranking sentences: an evaluation of two alternative schemes

    Ryen W. White;Ian Ruthven;Joemon M. Jose

  • The Use of Implicit Evidence for Relevance Feedback in Web Retrieval

    Ryen White;Ian Ruthven;Joemon M. Jose

  • Searcher’s Assessments of Task Complexity for Web Searching

    David J. Bell;Ian Ruthven

  • A study of factors affecting the utility of implicit relevance feedback

    Ryen W. White;Ian Ruthven;Joemon M. Jose

  • Interactive information retrieval

    Ian Ruthven

  • The everyday life information seeking behaviours of first-time mothers

    Katherine Loudon;Steven Buchanan;Ian Ruthven

  • An implicit feedback approach for interactive information retrieval

    Ryen W. White;Joemon M. Jose;Ian Ruthven

  • Incorporating user search behavior into relevance feedback

    Ian Ruthven;Mounia Lalmas;Keith Van Rijsbergen

  • Towards memory supporting personal information management tools

    David Elsweiler;Ian Ruthven;Christopher Jones

  • Exploring memory in email refinding

    David Elsweiler;Mark Baillie;Ian Ruthven

  • An eye-tracking approach to the analysis of relevance judgments on the Web: The case of Google search engine

    Panos Balatsoukas;Ian Ruthven

  • Comparing explicit and implicit feedback techniques for Web retrieval: TREC-10 interactive track report

    Ryen W. White;Joemon M. Jose;I. Ruthven

  • Proceedings of the 39th International ACM SIGIR conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval

    Raffaele Perego;Fabrizio Sebastiani;Javed Aslam;Ian Ruthven

  • Representing and retrieving structured documents using the Dempster‐Shafer theory of evidence: modelling and evaluation

    Mounia Lalmas;Ian Ruthven

  • A Simulated Study of Implicit Feedback Models

    Ryen W. White;Joemon M. Jose;C. J. van Rijsbergen;Ian Ruthven

  • The Loupe: tangible augmented reality for learning to look at Ancient Greek art

    Areti Damala;Eva Hornecker;Merel van der Vaart;Dick van Dijk

Frequent Co-Authors

Ryen W. White
Ryen W. White Microsoft (United States)
Joemon M. Jose
Joemon M. Jose University of Glasgow
Fabio Crestani
Fabio Crestani Universita della Svizzera Italiana
C. J. van Rijsbergen
C. J. van Rijsbergen University of Glasgow
Leif Azzopardi
Leif Azzopardi University of Strathclyde
Eva Hornecker
Eva Hornecker Bauhaus University, Weimar
Dawei Song
Dawei Song The Open University
Iadh Ounis
Iadh Ounis University of Glasgow
Craig Macdonald
Craig Macdonald University of Glasgow

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens the door to a variety of related fields, many of which now offer accessible online education pathways. Students can diversify their skill sets by considering relevant programs that blend technology, analytics, and engineering.

For those interested in environmental impact and sustainability, an environmental engineer degree online provides the opportunity to apply computational methods to real-world ecological challenges. Similarly, pursuing online mechanical engineering degrees can help students develop expertise in designing and analyzing mechanical systems—skills that often overlap with computer programming and simulation.

If you are drawn to scientific research, an online physics bachelor's degree equips you with critical problem-solving and mathematical modeling skills that are highly valued in tech-driven careers. Meanwhile, the rapid growth of big data makes data science programs especially attractive for those who want to work with large datasets, machine learning, or analytics.

Exploring these related degrees can broaden your career options and set you up for unique interdisciplinary roles in the digital economy.

Best Scientists Citing Ian Ruthven

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles