World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
30
Citations
13490
World Ranking
13807
National Ranking
5481

Jan O. Pedersen publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan O. Pedersen sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 60 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Jan O. Pedersen D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jan O. Pedersen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 30 D-Index — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2006 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Jan O. Pedersen is affiliated with Microsoft in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, including Medicine and Mathematics, with specific subfields involving Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Statistics and Probability, Neurology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, and Artificial Intelligence.

Their work encompasses a variety of main topics, such as:

  • Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Machine Learning and Algorithms
  • Advanced Bandit Algorithms Research

Jan O. Pedersen has published research in multiple venues, including:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics Biology and Medicine
  • Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Pedersen include:

  • "Improving brain B0 shimming using an easy and accessible multi-coil shim array at ultra-high field" (2022), published in Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics Biology and Medicine
  • "Learning Continuous Treatment Policy and Bipartite Embeddings for Matching with Heterogeneous Causal Effects" (2020), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Heterogeneous Causal Learning for Effectiveness Optimization in User Marketing" (2020), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • "Combining navigator-based prospective and data-driven retrospective motion correction for high resolution 7T multi-slice T2W MRI." (2023), published in Proceedings on CD-ROM - International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Scientific Meeting and Exhibition/Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, Scientific Meeting and Exhibition

The scientist frequently collaborates with other researchers, with co-authors including:

  • Vincent O. Boer
  • Esben Thade Petersen
  • Will Y. Zou
  • Nick Arango
  • Irene Kuang

Jan O. Pedersen was recognized as an ACM Distinguished Member in 2006.

Best Publications

  • Scatter/Gather: a cluster-based approach to browsing large document collections

    Douglass R. Cutting;David R. Karger;Jan O. Pedersen;John W. Tukey

  • A trainable document summarizer

    Julian Kupiec;Jan Pedersen;Francine Chen

  • Combating web spam with trustrank

    Zoltán Gyöngyi;Hector Garcia-Molina;Jan Pedersen

  • Reexamining the cluster hypothesis: scatter/gather on retrieval results

    Marti A. Hearst;Jan O. Pedersen

  • A Practical Part-of-Speech Tagger

    Doug Cutting;Julian Kupiec;Jan Pedersen;Penelope Sibun

  • A comparison of classifiers and document representations for the routing problem

    Hinrich Schütze;David A. Hull;Jan O. Pedersen

  • A cooccurrence-based thesaurus and two applications to information retrieval

    Hinrich Schütze;Jan O. Pedersen

  • Constant interaction-time scatter/gather browsing of very large document collections

    Douglass R. Cutting;David R. Karger;Jan O. Pedersen

  • Rich interaction in the digital library

    Ramana Rao;Jan O. Pedersen;Marti A. Hearst;Jock D. Mackinlay

  • Optimization for dynamic inverted index maintenance

    D. Cutting;J. Pedersen

  • A temporal comparison of AltaVista Web searching

    Bernard J. Jansen;Amanda Spink;Jan O. Pedersen

  • Finite-state transduction of related word forms for text indexing and retrieval

    Douglass R. Cutting;Per-Kristian G. Halvorsen;Ronald M. Kaplan;Lauri Karttunen

  • Multitasking during web search sessions

    Amanda Spink;Minsoo Park;Bernard J. Jansen;Jan Pedersen

  • Exploiting Hierarchy in Text Categorization

    Unknown

  • Link spam detection based on mass estimation

    Zoltan Gyongyi;Pavel Berkhin;Hector Garcia-Molina;Jan Pedersen

  • Automatic method of generating feature probabilities for automatic extracting summarization

    Julian M. Kupiec;Jan O. Pedersen;Francine R. Chen;Daniel C. Brotsky

  • Method combination for document filtering

    David A. Hull;Jan O. Pedersen;Hinrich Schütze

  • A temporal comparison of AltaVista Web searching: Research Articles

    Bernard J. Jansen;Amanda Spink;Jan Pedersen

  • Automatic method of extracting summarization using feature probabilities

    Julian M. Kupiec;Jan O. Pedersen;Francine R. Chen;Daniel C. Brotsky

  • Phrase recognition and expansion for short, precision-biased queries based on a query log

    Erika F. de Lima;Jan O. Pedersen

  • Scatter/Gather as a Tool for the Navigation of Retrieval Results

    Marti A. Hearst;David R. Karger;Jan O. Pedersen

Frequent Co-Authors

Marti A. Hearst
Marti A. Hearst University of California, Berkeley
Amanda Spink
Amanda Spink Queensland University of Technology
Bernard J. Jansen
Bernard J. Jansen Qatar Computing Research Institute
Hinrich Schütze
Hinrich Schütze Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Francine R. Chen
Francine R. Chen FX Palo Alto Laboratory
Brett Kessler
Brett Kessler Washington University in St. Louis
Gregory Grefenstette
Gregory Grefenstette Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition
John W. Tukey
John W. Tukey Princeton University
Lauri Karttunen
Lauri Karttunen Stanford University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring related online degrees can help you expand your skills and discover new career opportunities in tech and beyond. The rapid growth of online education provides flexible options for students who need to balance work, study, or family commitments.

Many students interested in computing also consider fields like engineering or environmental science. For example, if you’re passionate about technology and sustainability, you might ask, what can you do with an environmental science major? This degree opens doors to roles in research, policy, and consulting.

If you’re looking for more flexible schedules and faster completion times, there are numerous accelerated computer science degree programs available online. These programs let you enter the workforce sooner while maintaining academic rigor.

Engineering is another strong pathway for computer science enthusiasts. You might compare environmental engineering schools online and online mechanical engineering degrees to find the best fit for your career interests and budget.

By broadening your academic horizons, you can set yourself up for rewarding, in-demand careers that combine technology, innovation, and positive real-world impact.

Best Scientists Citing Jan O. Pedersen

Recently Published Articles