World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
32
Citations
5249
World Ranking
13046
National Ranking
501

Liwen Vaughan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liwen Vaughan sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 94 publications — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Liwen Vaughan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Liwen Vaughan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Liwen Vaughan is affiliated with the University of Western Ontario in Canada. Their research primarily explores areas within Social Sciences and Computer Science, with specific focus on Library and Information Sciences and Information Systems.

The main topics they cover include:

  • Library Science and Administration
  • Library Science and Information Literacy
  • Educational Methods and Media Use

Liwen Vaughan's publication record includes contributions to venues such as the Journal of Library Administration.

One notable paper authored by Vaughan is titled Towards a Definition of Multilingual Information Literacy (MLIL): An Essential Skill for the 21st Century, published in 2021 in the Journal of Library Administration.

In their collaborative work, Vaughan has worked with the following frequent co-authors:

  • Peggy Nzomo
  • Pamela J. McKenzie
  • Isola Ajiferuke

Best Publications

  • Why are Websites co-linked? The case of Canadian universities

    Liwen Vaughan;Margaret E. I. Kipp;Yijun Gao

  • Co-occurrence matrices and their applications in information science: Extending ACA to the Web environment

    Loet Leydesdorff;Liwen Vaughan

  • Search engine coverage bias: evidence and possible causes

    Liwen Vaughan;Mike Thelwall

  • New measurements for search engine evaluation proposed and tested

    Liwen Vaughan

  • Bibliographic and Web citations: what is the difference?

    Liwen Vaughan;Debora Shaw

  • Scholarly use of the web: what are the key inducers of links to journal web sites?

    Liwen Vaughan;Mike Thelwall

  • Web citation data for impact assessment: A comparison of four science disciplines

    Liwen Vaughan;Debora Shaw

  • Statistical methods for the information professional : a practical, painless approach to understanding, using, and interpreting statistics

    Liwen Vaughan

  • Data mining from web search queries: A comparison of google trends and baidu index

    Liwen Vaughan;Liwen Vaughan;Yue Chen

  • Links to commercial websites as a source of business information

    Liwen Vaughan;Guozhu Wu

  • Relationship between links to journal Web sites and impact factors

    Liwen Vaughan;Kathy Hysen

  • A modeling approach to uncover hyperlink patterns: the case of Canadian universities

    Liwen Vaughan;Mike Thelwall

  • Can electronic journal usage data replace citation data as a measure of journal use? An empirical examination

    Joanna Duy;Liwen Vaughan

  • A fair history of the Web? Examining country balance in the Internet Archive

    Mike Thelwall;Liwen Qiu Vaughan

  • A new look at evidence of scholarly citation in citation indexes and from web sources

    Liwen Vaughan;Debora Shaw

  • Exploring website features for business information

    Liwen Vaughan

  • Equal Representation by Search Engines? A Comparison of Websites across Countries and Domains

    Liwen Vaughan;Yanjun Zhang

  • Usage Data for Electronic Resources: A Comparison between Locally Collected and Vendor-Provided Statistics.

    Joanna Duy;Liwen Vaughan

  • Which academic subjects have most online impact? A pilot study and a new classification process

    Mike Thelwall;Liwen Vaughan;Viv Cothey;Xuemei Li

  • Why are hyperlinks to business Websites created? A content analysis

    Liwen Vaughan;Yijun Gao;Margaret E. I. Kipp

  • Webometrics : Information retrieval

    Mike Thelwall;Liwen Vaughan;Lenpart Biörneborn

  • Co-occurrence Matrices and Their Applications in Information Science : Extending ACA

    Loet Leydesdorff;Liwen Vaughan

Frequent Co-Authors

Mike Thelwall
Mike Thelwall University of Sheffield
Loet Leydesdorff
Loet Leydesdorff University of Amsterdam
Lázaro Rodríguez Ariza
Lázaro Rodríguez Ariza University of Granada
Fang Wang
Fang Wang New York University
Cassidy R. Sugimoto
Cassidy R. Sugimoto Indiana University
Judit Bar-Ilan
Judit Bar-Ilan Bar-Ilan University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA can open doors to a wide range of related online degrees and career paths. For students seeking flexibility and budget-friendly options, affordable online colleges offer programs that provide both quality education and cost savings. These online degrees are ideal for balancing study with work or family commitments.

If you’re interested in a more technical career path, pursuing an engineering degree online can be a strategic move. Engineering fields often intersect with computer science, opening opportunities in development, design, and research roles.

For professionals looking to advance into leadership or management, emba programs offer valuable skills for higher-level positions in tech, business, and entrepreneurship. Additionally, those interested in the information field might consider most affordable online mlis programs, where technology and information management skills are highly valued.

Exploring these related online programs can provide a well-rounded education and greater career flexibility in the ever-evolving landscape of technology and information sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Liwen Vaughan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles