World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
97
Citations
34172
World Ranking
9293
National Ranking
51

Heinz Redl publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heinz Redl sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 846 publications — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Heinz Redl D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Heinz Redl sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 97 D-Index — 55th percentile

55% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Heinz Redl is affiliated with the University of Vienna in Austria. Their research primarily spans the field of Medicine, with a focus on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering, Biomaterials, Molecular Biology, and Genetics as significant subfields of study.

Their recent scholarly output includes several published papers across various scientific venues. These include:

  • "Guidelines for minimal information on cellular senescence experimentation in vivo" (2024) published in Cell
  • "Stiffness Matters: Fine-Tuned Hydrogel Elasticity Alters Chondrogenic Redifferentiation" (2020) published in Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
  • "Crosslinking strategies for silk fibroin hydrogels: promising biomedical materials" (2020) published in Biomedical Materials
  • "Generation and maturation of human iPSC-derived 3D organotypic cardiac microtissues in long-term culture" (2022) published in Scientific Reports
  • "Establishment of a human three-dimensional chip-based chondro-synovial coculture joint model for reciprocal cross talk studies in arthritis research" (2021) published in Lab on a Chip

Frequently, Heinz Redl coauthors with researchers including Johannes Grillari, Patrick Heimel, Barbara Schädl, Andreas Teuschl, and Rainer Mittermayr, reflecting collaborations across their research projects.

Key topics addressed in Heinz Redl's work include:

  • Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
  • 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Mesenchymal stem cell research
  • Periodontal Regeneration and Treatments
  • Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

Their publications are often found in specialized venues such as Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), International Journal of Molecular Sciences, European Cells and Materials, and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Best Publications

  • Stromal cells from the adipose tissue-derived stromal vascular fraction and culture expanded adipose tissue-derived stromal/stem cells: A joint statement of the International Federation for Adipose Therapeutics and Science (IFATS) and the International Society for Cellular Therapy (ISCT)

    Philippe Bourin;Bruce A. Bunnell;Louis Casteilla;Massimo Dominici

  • Systemic inflammatory response syndrome after cardiac operations

    Joachim Cremer;Marius Martin;Heinz Redl;Soheyl Bahrami

  • The challenge of establishing preclinical models for segmental bone defect research.

    Johannes C. Reichert;Siamak Saifzadeh;Siamak Saifzadeh;Martin E. Wullschleger;Devakara R. Epari

  • Dose-dependent immunomodulatory effect of human stem cells from amniotic membrane: a comparison with human mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue.

    Susanne Wolbank;Anja Peterbauer;Marc Fahrner;Simone Hennerbichler

  • Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Urine

    Ting Zhou;Christina Benda;Sarah Duzinger;Yinghua Huang

  • Interleukin-8 Released into the Cerebrospinal Fluid after Brain Injury is Associated with Blood–Brain Barrier Dysfunction and Nerve Growth Factor Production:

    Thomas Kossmann;Philip F Stahel;Philipp M Lenzlinger;Heinz Redl

  • Inflammatory mediators in relation to the development of multiple organ failure in patients after severe blunt trauma

    R.M.H. Roumen;H. Redl;G. Schlag;G. Zilow

  • Copeptin, a stable peptide of the arginine vasopressin precursor, is elevated in hemorrhagic and septic shock.

    Nils G Morgenthaler;Beat Müller;Joachim Struck;Andreas Bergmann

  • Extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) for wound healing: technology, mechanisms, and clinical efficacy.

    Rainer Mittermayr;Vlado Antonic;Joachim Hartinger;Hanna Kaufmann

  • Pathophysiology of shock, sepsis, and organ failure

    Günther Schlag;Heinz Redl

  • Minimum Quality Threshold in Pre-Clinical Sepsis Studies (MQTiPSS) : an international expert consensus initiative for improvement of animal modeling in sepsis

    Marcin F. Osuchowski;Alfred Ayala;Soheyl Bahrami;Michael Bauer

  • Generation of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Umbilical Cord Matrix and Amniotic Membrane Mesenchymal Cells

    Jinglei Cai;Wen Li;Huanxing Su;Dajiang Qin

  • Light therapy by blue LED improves wound healing in an excision model in rats

    Natalia Adamskaya;Peter Dungel;Rainer Mittermayr;Joachim Hartinger

  • The influence of scaffold architecture on chondrocyte distribution and behavior in matrix-associated chondrocyte transplantation grafts

    Sylvia Nuernberger;Norbert Cyran;Christian Albrecht;Heinz Redl

  • Thermoresponsive self-assembled elastin-based nanoparticles for delivery of BMPs.

    Paulo C. Bessa;Raul Machado;Sylvia Nürnberger;Daniela Dopler

  • Intramedullary pressure changes and fat intravasation during intramedullary nailing: an experimental study in sheep.

    Gerald Eliot Wozasek;Paul Simon;Heinz Redl;Günther Schlag

  • Mitochondrial ROS production under cellular stress: comparison of different detection methods

    Andrey V. Kuznetsov;Ingeborg Kehrer;Andrey V. Kozlov;Martina Haller

  • Secreted microvesicular miR-31 inhibits osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells.

    Sylvia Weilner;Elisabeth Schraml;Matthias Wieser;Paul Messner

  • Circulating microRNA Signatures in Patients With Idiopathic and Postmenopausal Osteoporosis and Fragility Fractures.

    Roland Kocijan;Christian Muschitz;Elisabeth Geiger;Susanna Skalicky

  • Human mesenchymal stem cells from adipose tissue and amnion influence T-cells depending on stimulation method and presence of other immune cells.

    Barbara Kronsteiner;Susanne Wolbank;Anja Peterbauer;Christa Hackl

Frequent Co-Authors

Martijn van Griensven
Martijn van Griensven Maastricht University
Christian Gabriel
Christian Gabriel Charité - University Medicine Berlin
Johannes Grillari
Johannes Grillari BOKU University
Daniel L. Traber
Daniel L. Traber The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Hans Nohl
Hans Nohl University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna
Wolfgang G. Junger
Wolfgang G. Junger Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
David N. Herndon
David N. Herndon The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Rui L. Reis
Rui L. Reis University of Minho
Paul Messner
Paul Messner BOKU University
Peter Ertl
Peter Ertl TU Wien

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in Medicine but looking for flexible study options, there are several related online degrees worth exploring. Today, many students pursue a nursing degree online, which can provide a strong foundation for advanced healthcare roles. These online programs are ideal for those balancing work or family commitments.

Advancing your career as a registered nurse is more accessible with affordable rn to bsn programs available at many institutions. If you're aiming for leadership or specialized clinical positions, consider enrolling in the cheapest dnp online program, which prepares nurses for top roles in practice, policy, and education.

For those who hold a non-nursing bachelor's degree but want to change their career path, direct msn programs online offer a fast-track route to becoming a nurse. Exploring these online academic pathways can accelerate your entry into the medical workforce and support long-term career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Heinz Redl

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles