World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 75 19159 9551 881 19417

Daniel L. Traber publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel L. Traber between 1963 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel L. Traber published across 63 years, from 1963 to 2025, averaging 14.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 50 publications in 2006. 5 of the 899 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40 50
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1963 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 50. Peak 50 publications in 2006. 1963: 1 publication 1964: 0 publications 1965: 1 publication 1966: 1 publication 1967: 5 publications 1968: 4 publications 1969: 6 publications 1970: 8 publications 1971: 9 publications 1972: 4 publications 1973: 5 publications 1974: 3 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 1 publication 1977: 2 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 6 publications 1980: 2 publications 1981: 3 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 5 publications 1984: 5 publications 1985: 10 publications 1986: 13 publications 1987: 11 publications 1988: 31 publications 1989: 22 publications 1990: 33 publications 1991: 21 publications 1992: 20 publications 1993: 25 publications 1994: 31 publications 1995: 46 publications 1996: 29 publications 1997: 36 publications 1998: 25 publications 1999: 37 publications 2000: 28 publications 2001: 18 publications 2002: 34 publications 2003: 26 publications 2004: 27 publications 2005: 28 publications 2006: 50 publications 2007: 43 publications 2008: 30 publications 2009: 37 publications 2010: 34 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 20 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 1 publication 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 0 publications 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1963 2025

899 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel L. Traber: publications per year, 1963 to 2025
Year Publications
1963 1
1964 0
1965 1
1966 1
1967 5
1968 4
1969 6
1970 8
1971 9
1972 4
1973 5
1974 3
1975 0
1976 1
1977 2
1978 0
1979 6
1980 2
1981 3
1982 3
1983 5
1984 5
1985 10
1986 13
1987 11
1988 31
1989 22
1990 33
1991 21
1992 20
1993 25
1994 31
1995 46
1996 29
1997 36
1998 25
1999 37
2000 28
2001 18
2002 34
2003 26
2004 27
2005 28
2006 50
2007 43
2008 30
2009 37
2010 34
2011 26
2012 20
2013 10
2014 4
2015 3
2016 1
2017 0
2018 0
2019 1
2020 0
2021 0
2022 0
2023 10
2024 2
2025 3
Total 899
Download as CSV

Daniel L. Traber publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel L. Traber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 881–900 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 881 publications — 91st percentile

91% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139 881
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel L. Traber D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel L. Traber sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 74–75 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 75 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574 75
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel L. Traber was affiliated with The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston in the United States. Their research spanned multiple domains within Earth and Environmental Sciences, focusing extensively on geochemistry, groundwater studies, and environmental engineering.

Their main fields of study included:

  • Earth and Planetary Sciences
  • Environmental Science
  • Engineering

Subfields explored in their work were:

  • Environmental Engineering
  • Geochemistry and Petrology
  • Civil and Structural Engineering
  • Mechanics of Materials
  • Inorganic Chemistry

Traber's research addressed diverse scientific topics such as:

  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies
  • Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry
  • Soil and Unsaturated Flow
  • Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
  • Radioactive element chemistry and processing
  • CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Geological and Geochemical Analysis

Their publication record consisted predominantly of articles in the following venues:

  • Applied Geochemistry
  • Applied Clay Science

Some of their recent scientific papers included:

  • Swiss deep drilling campaign 2019-2022: Geological overview and rock properties with focus on porosity and pore-space architecture (2023, Applied Geochemistry)
  • Porewater composition in clay rocks explored by advective displacement and squeezing experiments (2023, Applied Geochemistry)
  • Porewater profiles of Cl and Br in boreholes penetrating the Mesozoic sequence in northern Switzerland (2023, Applied Geochemistry)
  • Experimental study of water-extractable sulphate in Opalinus Clay and implications for deriving porewater concentrations (2023, Applied Geochemistry)
  • Geochemistry and palaeo-hydrogeology of the weathered zone in the Opalinus Clay (2022, Applied Clay Science)

Their collaborative efforts involved frequent co-authors, including:

  • Martin Mazurek
  • Paul Wersin
  • Thomas Gimmi
  • Carmen Zwahlen
  • Lukas Aschwanden

Best Publications

  • American Burn Association consensus conference to define sepsis and infection in burns

    David G. Greenhalgh;Jeffrey R. Saffle;James H. Holmes;Richard L. Gamelli

  • Effect on mortality of inhalation injury.

    Paul B. Thompson;David N. Herndon;Daniel L. Traber;Sally Abston

  • Heparin nebulization attenuates acute lung injury in sepsis following smoke inhalation in sheep

    Kazunori Murakami;Roy McGuire;Robert A. Cox;Jeffrey M. Jodoin

  • Pathophysiology of acute lung injury in combined burn and smoke inhalation injury.

    Perenlei Enkhbaatar;Daniel L. Traber

  • Beneficial versus detrimental effects of nitric oxide synthase inhibitors in circulatory shock: lessons learned from experimental and clinical studies.

    Robert G. Kilbourn;Csaba Szabo;Daniel L. Traber

  • Reversal of hyperdynamic response to continuous endotoxin administration by inhibition of NO synthesis

    J. Meyer;L. D. Traber;S. Nelson;C. W. Lentz

  • Airway obstruction in sheep with burn and smoke inhalation injuries.

    Robert A. Cox;Ann S. Burke;Kazutaka Soejima;Kazunori Murakami

  • Gut failure and translocation following burn and sepsis

    Pedro Baron;Lillian D. Traber;Daniel L. Traber;Thuan Nguyen

  • Clinical detection of LPS and animal models of endotoxemia.

    Heinz Redl;Soheyl Bahrami;Günther Schlag;Dan L. Traber

  • The Inducible Nitric Oxide Synthase Inhibitor BBS-2 Prevents Acute Lung Injury in Sheep after Burn and Smoke Inhalation Injury

    Perenlei Enkhbaatar;Kazunori Murakami;Katsumi Shimoda;Akio Mizutani

  • Pathophysiology, management and treatment of smoke inhalation injury

    Sebastian Rehberg;Marc O Maybauer;Perenlei Enkhbaatar;Dirk M Maybauer

  • Human mesenchymal stem cells reduce the severity of acute lung injury in a sheep model of bacterial pneumonia

    Sven Asmussen;Hiroshi Ito;Daniel L Traber;Jae W Lee

  • A porcine model of full-thickness burn, excision and skin autografting

    Ludwik K. Branski;Rainer Mittermayr;David N. Herndon;William B. Norbury

  • Postburn gastrointestinal vasoconstriction increases bacterial and endotoxin translocation

    R. Tokyay;S. T. Zeigler;D. L. Traber;Joseph Clarke Stothert

  • Pulmonary deposition and clearance of aerosolized alpha-1-proteinase inhibitor administered to dogs and to sheep.

    R M Smith;L D Traber;D L Traber;R G Spragg

  • Protective effect of hydrogen sulfide in a murine model of acute lung injury induced by combined burn and smoke inhalation

    Aimalohi Esechie;Levente Kiss;Gabor Olah;Eszter M. Horváth

  • The pathophysiology of smoke inhalation injury in a sheep model

    Herndon Dn;Traber Dl;Niehaus Gd;Linares Ha

  • Pathophysiological analysis of combined burn and smoke inhalation injuries in sheep.

    Kazutaka Soejima;Frank C. Schmalstieg;Hiroyuki Sakurai;Lillian D. Traber

  • Role of nitric oxide in vascular permeability after combined burns and smoke inhalation injury.

    Kazutaka Soejima;Lillian D. Traber;Frank C. Schmalstieg;Hal Hawkins

  • Inhalation injury in burned patients: effects and treatment.

    David Herndon;R. E. Barrow;H. A. Linares;R. L. Rutan

Frequent Co-Authors

David N. Herndon
David N. Herndon The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston
Csaba Szabó
Csaba Szabó University of Fribourg
Heinz Redl
Heinz Redl Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Experimental and Clinical Traumatology
Hugo Van Aken
Hugo Van Aken University of Münster
Maret G. Traber
Maret G. Traber Oregon State University
Robert R. Wolfe
Robert R. Wolfe University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences
Edward R. Sherwood
Edward R. Sherwood Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Andrew L. Salzman
Andrew L. Salzman Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a future in Medicine or healthcare, there are a variety of online degree pathways that can help launch your career—many of which offer flexibility and accessible entry points. Prospective nurses without a traditional background may want to explore direct entry online MSN programs. These programs are designed for non-nurses and can help accelerate the transition into advanced nursing roles.

For those looking for accessible nursing education options, several schools offer entry with fewer competitive barriers. You can learn more about admission requirements by checking out the easiest BSN program to get into.

Not all healthcare careers require hands-on clinical work; some students may find a good fit in health administration fields. In particular, accredited online certificates in medical billing and coding can offer financial support. Browse your options at accredited medical billing and coding schools online with financial aid.

Finally, admission tests can be a roadblock for some. If you are concerned about entrance exams like TEAS or HESI, review schools listed in do all nursing schools require the teas to discover more accessible options.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel L. Traber

Recently Published Articles