World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Mathematics

D-Index
55
Citations
19413
World Ranking
771
National Ranking
377

David H. Bailey publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David H. Bailey sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 210 publications — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

David H. Bailey D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David H. Bailey sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 79th percentile

79% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Overview

David H. Bailey is affiliated with Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory in the United States. Their work spans multiple fields, primarily focusing on Economics, Econometrics and Finance, as well as Social Sciences.

The main subfields of study covered by their research include Finance, Economics and Econometrics, Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, and Computational Theory and Mathematics. Their research topics cover a range of areas such as Financial Markets and Investment Strategies, Financial Risk and Volatility Modeling, Social Media and Politics, Numerical Methods and Algorithms, Complex Systems and Time Series Analysis, History and Theory of Mathematics, and Social and Cultural Dynamics.

David H. Bailey has published papers in various scholarly venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • American Mathematical Monthly
  • Nature Human Behaviour
  • PNAS Nexus
  • The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Some notable papers authored or co-authored by Bailey include:

  • "Homophily and acrophily as drivers of political segregation," 2022, Nature Human Behaviour
  • "Attraction to politically extreme users on social media," 2024, PNAS Nexus
  • "Finance is Not Excused: Why Finance Should Not Flout Basic Principles of Statistics," 2021, SSRN Electronic Journal
  • "Discovery of Novel Trypanosoma brucei Phosphodiesterase B1 Inhibitors by Virtual Screening against the Unliganded TbrPDEB1 Crystal Structure," 2020, OPAL (Open@LaTrobe) (La Trobe University)
  • "Reproducibility and variable precision computing," 2020, The International Journal of High Performance Computing Applications

In addition to journal articles, Bailey has contributed to book publications. These include titles published by Oxford University Press and Springer International Publishing, such as "Competition Law" (2024) and "From Analysis to Visualization" (2020).

Their frequent collaborators feature several researchers with whom they have co-authored multiple works, including:

  • Marcos López de Prado
  • Richard Whish
  • Amit Goldenberg
  • Jonas Schöne
  • Robb Willer

Best Publications

  • The NAS parallel benchmarks—summary and preliminary results

    D. H. Bailey;E. Barszcz;J. T. Barton;D. S. Browning

  • The Nas Parallel Benchmarks

    D.H. Bailey;E. Barszcz;J.T. Barton;D.S. Browning

  • IEEE Standard for Floating-Point Arithmetic

    Dan Zuras;Mike Cowlishaw;Alex Aiken;Matthew Applegate

  • On the rapid computation of various polylogarithmic constants

    David Bailey;Peter Borwein;Simon Plouffe

  • NAS parallel benchmark results

    D.H. Bailey;E. Barszcz;L. Dagum;H.D. Simon

  • FFTs in external or hierarchical memory

    D. H. Bailey

  • The fractional Fourier transform and applications

    David H. Bailey;Paul N. Swarztrauber

  • Enhancing reproducibility for computational methods.

    Victoria Stodden;Marcia McNutt;David H. Bailey;Ewa Deelman

  • Experimentation in mathematics : computational paths to discovery

    Jonathan M. Borwein;David H. Bailey;Roland Girgensohn

  • Algorithms for quad-double precision floating point arithmetic

    Y. Hida;X.S. Li;D.H. Bailey

  • Precimonious: tuning assistant for floating-point precision

    Cindy Rubio-González;Cuong Nguyen;Hong Diep Nguyen;James Demmel

  • Analysis of PSLQ, an integer relation finding algorithm

    Helaman R. P. Ferguson;David H. Bailey;Steve Arno

  • Design, implementation and testing of extended and mixed precision BLAS

    Xiaoye S. Li;James W. Demmel;David H. Bailey;Greg Henry

  • Experimental Mathematics in Action

    David H. Bailey

  • A Fortran 90-based multiprecision system

    David H. Bailey

  • THE SHARPE RATIO EFFICIENT FRONTIER

    David H. Bailey;Marcos M. López de Prado

  • Algorithm 719: Multiprecision translation and execution of FORTRAN programs

    David H. Bailey

  • PSEUDO-MATHEMATICS AND FINANCIAL CHARLATANISM: THE EFFECTS OF BACKTEST OVERFITTING ON OUT-OF-SAMPLE PERFORMANCE

    David H. Bailey;Jonathan M. Borwein;Marcos López de Prado;Qiji Jim Zhu

  • Ramanujan, modular equations, and approximations to Pi or how to compute one billion digits of Pi

    J. M. Borwein;P. B. Borwein;D. H. Bailey

  • Parallel integer relation detection: techniques and applications

    David H. Bailey;David J. Broadhurst

  • Elliptic integral evaluations of Bessel moments

    David H. Bailey;Jonathan M. Borwein;David Broadhurst;M. L. Glasser

  • ARPREC: An arbitrary precision computation package

    David H. Bailey;Hida Yozo;Xiaoye S. Li;Brandon Thompson

  • Design, implementation and testing of extended and mixed precision BLAS

    X.S. Li;J.W. Demmel;D.H. Bailey;G. Henry

Frequent Co-Authors

Jonathan M. Borwein
Jonathan M. Borwein University of Newcastle Australia
Horst D. Simon
Horst D. Simon Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Xiaoye S. Li
Xiaoye S. Li Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Jack Dongarra
Jack Dongarra University of Tennessee at Knoxville
Samuel Williams
Samuel Williams Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Allan Snavely
Allan Snavely University of California, San Diego
Peter Borwein
Peter Borwein Simon Fraser University
James Demmel
James Demmel University of California, Berkeley
Leonid Oliker
Leonid Oliker Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
Katherine Yelick
Katherine Yelick University of California, Berkeley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to various advanced degree options and career pathways. Many students consider pursuing an online MBA to combine quantitative skills with business knowledge. When exploring options, it's important to understand the availability of transfer credits for online mba programs, which can reduce time and cost by recognizing prior coursework.

For those interested in data-driven careers, a masters in data analytics is a natural extension of a mathematics background. This degree focuses on extracting insights from complex datasets, a skill highly valued in today’s job market.

If flexibility and ease of admission are priorities, exploring the easiest mba and easiest online mba programs can offer accessible pathways to upgrade your credentials without compromising quality.

Combining mathematics with business or data-focused graduate programs can significantly broaden career prospects, making these related online degrees valuable options for current and aspiring mathematicians.

Best Scientists Citing David H. Bailey

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles