World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
40
Citations
6575
World Ranking
9322
National Ranking
3959

Tarek El-Ghazawi publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tarek El-Ghazawi sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 357 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Tarek El-Ghazawi D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tarek El-Ghazawi sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tarek El-Ghazawi is affiliated with George Washington University in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields with a primary focus on Engineering and Computer Science. Within these fields, their work concentrates on subfields such as Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Computer Networks and Communications, Mechanical Engineering, and Information Systems.

The scientist's research covers topics including Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing, Optical Network Technologies, Photonic and Optical Devices, Advanced Memory and Neural Computing, Cloud Computing and Resource Management, Modular Robots and Swarm Intelligence, and Advanced Materials and Mechanics.

Among their recent publications are:

  • Primer on silicon neuromorphic photonic processors: architecture and compiler (2020), published in Nanophotonics
  • Virtualizing a Post-Moore's Law Analog Mesh Processor: The Case of a Photonic PDE Accelerator (2022), published in ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems
  • Reconfigurable application-specific photonic integrated circuit for solving partial differential equations (2024), published in Nanophotonics
  • Reconfigurable Application-Specific Photonic Integrated Circuit for solving Partial Differential Equations (2022), published in arXiv (Cornell University)
  • ROC (2020), published in ACM Transactions on Parallel Computing

Tarek El-Ghazawi has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Volker J. Sorger, Mario Miscuglio, Jeff Anderson, Engin Kayraklioglu, and Hamid Reza Imani.

Their research has been published in venues such as arXiv (Cornell University), Nanophotonics, ACM Transactions on Embedded Computing Systems, ACM Computing Surveys, and IEEE Journal on Emerging and Selected Topics in Circuits and Systems.

Best Publications

  • UPC: Distributed Shared-Memory Programming

    Tarek El-Ghazawi;William Carlson;Thomas Sterling;Katherine Yelick

  • UPC Language Specifications V1.1.1

    Tarek A. El-Ghazawi;George Washington;William W. Carlson;Jesse M. Draper

  • Automatic reduction of hyperspectral imagery using wavelet spectral analysis

    S. Kaewpijit;J. Le Moigne;T. El-Ghazawi

  • The Promise of High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing

    T. El-Ghazawi;E. El-Araby;Miaoqing Huang;K. Gaj

  • An evaluation of global address space languages: co-array fortran and unified parallel C

    Cristian Coarfa;Yuri Dotsenko;John Mellor-Crummey;François Cantonnet

  • Efficient Hierarchical-PCA Dimension Reduction for Hyperspectral Imagery

    A. Agarwal;T. El-Ghazawi;H. El-Askary;J. Le-Moigne

  • UPC Performance and Potential: A NPB Experimental Study

    Tarek El-Ghazawi;Francois Cantonnet

  • Towards Accurate Prediction for High-Dimensional and Highly-Variable Cloud Workloads with Deep Learning

    Zheyi Chen;Jia Hu;Geyong Min;Albert Y. Zomaya

  • UPC: unified parallel C

    Tarek El-Ghazawi;Lauren Smith

  • ITO-based Electro-absorption Modulator for Photonic Neural Activation Function

    R. Amin;J. K. George;S. Sun;T. Ferreira de Lima

  • Enhancing Relocatability of Partial Bitstreams for Run-Time Reconfiguration

    T. Becker;W. Luk;P.Y.K. Cheung

  • New Hardware Architectures for Montgomery Modular Multiplication Algorithm

    Miaoqing Huang;K Gaj;T El-Ghazawi

  • Adaptive and Efficient Resource Allocation in Cloud Datacenters Using Actor-Critic Deep Reinforcement Learning

    Unknown

  • Neuromorphic photonics with electro-absorption modulators.

    Jonathan K George;Armin Mehrabian;Rubab Amin;Jiawei Meng

  • Productivity analysis of the UPC language

    F. Cantonnet;Y. Yao;M. Zahran;T. El-Ghazawi

  • Guest Editors' Introduction: High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing

    Duncan Buell;Tarek El-Ghazawi;Kris Gaj;Volodymyr Kindratenko

  • PCNNA: A Photonic Convolutional Neural Network Accelerator

    Armin Mehrabian;Yousra Al-Kabani;Volker J Sorger;Tarek El-Ghazawi

  • Reconfigurable Computing: Architectures, Tools and Applications

    Andreas Koch;Ram Krishnamurthy;John McAllister;Roger Woods

  • A self-stabilizing distributed algorithm for spanning tree construction in wireless ad hoc networks

    H. Baala;O. Flauzac;J. Gaber;M. Bui

  • 2-phase GA-based image registration on parallel clusters

    Prachya Chalermwat;Tarek El-Ghazawi;Jacqueline LeMoigne

  • Exploiting Partial Runtime Reconfiguration for High-Performance Reconfigurable Computing

    Esam El-Araby;Ivan Gonzalez;Tarek El-Ghazawi

  • ITO-based Electro-absorption Modulator for Photonic Neural Activation Function

    Rubab Amin;Jonathan George;Shuai Sun;Thomas Ferreira de Lima

Frequent Co-Authors

Volker J. Sorger
Volker J. Sorger George Washington University
Kris Gaj
Kris Gaj George Mason University
Katherine Yelick
Katherine Yelick University of California, Berkeley
Paul R. Prucnal
Paul R. Prucnal Princeton University
Menas Kafatos
Menas Kafatos Chapman University
Bhavin J. Shastri
Bhavin J. Shastri Queen's University
Ophir Frieder
Ophir Frieder Georgetown University
Hamed Dalir
Hamed Dalir University of Florida
Alexander N. Tait
Alexander N. Tait Princeton University
Jacob B. Khurgin
Jacob B. Khurgin Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens doors to a variety of online degree options and career paths. Many students are interested in flexible learning, and an accelerated associates degree online can help you gain foundational knowledge in as little as six months. This is ideal if you want to enter the workforce quickly or seek a fast track to a bachelor’s program.

For those seeking a broader education with high job prospects, pursuing the best online business degree is a smart choice. Business skills are highly valued in technology management and entrepreneurial ventures. Affordability is also a key concern, and it's worth exploring the most affordable bachelor's degree online options available for both computer science and related fields.

If you aspire to a technical or engineering career, consider programs from the cheapest online engineering degree providers. These programs combine flexibility with practical skills, offering a strong foundation for future innovation in technology. No matter your path, online degrees provide accessible, flexible, and often budget-friendly ways to start or advance your career in computer science and related areas.

Best Scientists Citing Tarek El-Ghazawi

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles