World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
5035
World Ranking
10848
National Ranking
622

William Lovegrove publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Lovegrove sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 79 publications — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

William Lovegrove D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William Lovegrove sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

William Lovegrove was affiliated with the University of Wollongong in Australia. Their research primarily focused on fields within psychology, with particular engagement in clinical psychology and experimental and cognitive psychology.

The scientist's work addressed topics including mindfulness and compassion interventions, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, treatment, cognitive processes, as well as COVID-19 and mental health.

Among their recent publications is a paper titled The Effect of Mindfulness and Compassion Meditation on State Empathy and Emotion, published in 2021 in the journal Mindfulness.

  • The Effect of Mindfulness and Compassion Meditation on State Empathy and Emotion (2021, Mindfulness)

Collaborators frequently worked with William Lovegrove included:

  • Jesse Martin-Allan
  • Peter Leeson

Their publication record, though concise, predominantly appeared in the journal Mindfulness.

  • Mindfulness

The scope of their research reflected a combination of clinical psychology perspectives and experimental approaches to cognition, with particular attention to mental health issues amidst pandemic conditions and therapeutic interventions involving mindfulness and compassion.

Best Publications

  • A theoretical and experimental case for a visual deficit in specific reading disability

    William Lovegrove;Frances Martin;Walter Slaghuis

  • Reading disability: Spatial frequency specific deficits in visual information store.

    W.J. Lovegrove;M. Heddle;W. Slaghuis

  • Measuring Visual Discomfort

    Elizabeth G. Conlon;William J. Lovegrove;Eugene Chekaluk;Philippa E. Pattison

  • Flicker Contrast Sensitivity in Normal and Specifically Disabled Readers

    Frances Martin;William Lovegrove

  • The Effects of Contrast, Stimulus Duration, and Spatial Frequency on Visible Persistence in Normal and Specifically Disabled Readers.

    David Badcock;William Lovegrove

  • Low-frequency filtering and the processing of local-global stimuli.

    Johanna C Badcock;Felicity A Whitworth;David R Badcock;William J Lovegrove

  • The effects of field size and luminance on contrast sensitivity differences between specifically reading disabled and normal children

    Frances Martin;William Lovegrove

  • Contrast sensitivity functions and specific reading disability.

    William Lovegrove;Frances Martin;Alison C Bowling;Mary Blackwood

  • Measures of phonological short-term memory and their relationship to vocabulary development

    S. E. Avons;Christopher A. Wragg;Wragg L. Cupples;William J. Lovegrove

  • Weakness in the Transient Visual System: A Causal Factor in Dyslexia?

    William Lovegrove

  • Spatial-frequency-dependent visible persistence and specific reading disability.

    Walter L. Slaghuis;William J. Lovegrove

  • Uniform-Field Flicker Masking in Control and Specifically-Disabled Readers

    Frances Martin;William J Lovegrove

  • Visual and language processing deficits are concurrent in dyslexia.

    W.L. Slaghuis;W.J. Lovegrove;J.A. Davidson

  • Two components to visible persistence: effects of orientation and contrast.

    Alison Bowling;William Lovegrove

  • Flicker masking of spatial-frequency-dependent visible persistence and specific reading disability.

    Walter L Slaghuis;William Lovegrove

  • DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATION PROCESSING IN NORMAL AND DISABLED READERS

    William Lovegrove;Christina Brown

  • The Effects of Visual Discomfort and Pattern Structure on Visual Search

    Elizabeth Conlon;William Lovegrove;Trevor Hine;Eugene Chekaluk

  • Metacontrast with masks varying in spatial frequency and wavelength.

    Mary C. Williams;Bruno G. Breitmeyer;William J. Lovegrove;Carolina Gutierrez

  • Transient deficit hypothesis and dyslexia: examination of whole-parts relationship, retinal sensitivity, and spatial and temporal frequencies.

    Alan G Keen;William J Lovegrove

  • Iconic memory: fallacies persist (?)

    Alison C Bowling;William Lovegrove

  • Visual temporal processing deficits in specific reading disability.

    William J. Lovegrove;Mary C. Williams

Frequent Co-Authors

Philippa Pattison
Philippa Pattison University of Sydney
Susan J. Paxton
Susan J. Paxton La Trobe University
Bruno G. Breitmeyer
Bruno G. Breitmeyer University of Houston
Johanna C. Badcock
Johanna C. Badcock University of Western Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees in the USA opens up flexible learning opportunities and diverse career pathways. Prospective students can compare programs based on factors like accreditation, faculty expertise, specialization opportunities, and support services. Each state and institution may have unique offerings and requirements, making it important to research your options thoroughly.

For example, online psychology programs in Alabama are recognized for their accessibility and strong student support, while online psychology bachelor's programs in Cincinnati stand out for their hands-on learning opportunities and industry links.

Students researching the best online psychology bachelor's program rankings in Illinois may discover high-ranked courses with a broad range of specializations, helping to prepare graduates for roles in counseling, human resources, or research. Likewise, those interested in online psychology bachelor's degrees in New York will find programs with a focus on urban issues and diverse communities.

An online psychology degree can be the first step toward careers in mental health, education, business, or social services—giving graduates flexible pathways to make a meaningful impact.

Best Scientists Citing William Lovegrove

Recently Published Articles