World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
36
Citations
11406
World Ranking
9324
National Ranking
4931

Neuroscience

D-Index
36
Citations
11406
World Ranking
8892
National Ranking
3763

Wilma Koutstaal publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wilma Koutstaal sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 96 publications — 15th percentile

15% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Wilma Koutstaal D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Wilma Koutstaal sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 7th percentile

7% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Wilma Koutstaal is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States, focusing primarily on psychology with extensive work in experimental and cognitive psychology. Their research spans cognitive neuroscience, clinical psychology, mechanical engineering, and social psychology, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to understanding human behavior and brain function.

The scientist's research concentrates on creativity, education, and neuroscience, particularly the intersection of psychological and educational research studies. Their work also covers mind wandering and attention, design education and practice, aesthetic perception and analysis, as well as art therapy and mental health. Child therapy and development form another area within their broader scope of study.

Coauthors frequently collaborating with Wilma Koutstaal include Kathryn R. Cullen, Michaelle E. DiMaggio-Potter, Bonnie Klimes-Dougan, Bryon A. Mueller, and Yuko Taniguchi.

Wilma Koutstaal has published several papers, among which the following are notable:

  • "Charting the contributions of cognitive flexibility to creativity: Self-guided transitions as a process-based index of creativity-related adaptivity" (2020, PLoS ONE)
  • "Evaluating the predictive validity of four divergent thinking tasks for the originality of design product ideation" (2022, PLoS ONE)
  • "Capturing, clarifying, and consolidating the curiosity-creativity connection" (2022, Scientific Reports)
  • "The Multifaceted Role of Self-Generated Question Asking in Curiosity-Driven Learning" (2023, Cognitive Science)
  • "Fostering creative minds: what predicts and boosts design competence in the classroom?" (2020, International Journal of Technology and Design Education)

Wilma Koutstaal's work has appeared in journals and publication venues such as Harvard Dataverse, PLoS ONE, Creativity Research Journal, Cognitive Science, and Scientific Reports.

In recognition of their contributions to science, Wilma Koutstaal was named a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 2014.

Best Publications

  • Building Memories: Remembering and Forgetting of Verbal Experiences as Predicted by Brain Activity

    Anthony D. Wagner;Daniel L. Schacter;Michael Rotte;Wilma Koutstaal

  • THE COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE OF CONSTRUCTIVE MEMORY

    Daniel L. Schacter;Kenneth Andrew Norman;Wilma Koutstaal

  • Functional-anatomic correlates of object priming in humans revealed by rapid presentation event-related fMRI

    Randy L. Buckner;Julie Goodman;Marc Burock;Michael Rotte;Michael Rotte

  • Gist-Based False Recognition of Pictures in Older and Younger Adults

    Wilma Koutstaal;Daniel L. Schacter

  • Late Onset of Anterior Prefrontal Activity during True and False Recognition: An Event-Related fMRI Study

    Daniel L. Schacter;Randy L. Buckner;Wilma Koutstaal;Anders M. Dale

  • Functional neuroimaging studies of encoding, priming, and explicit memory retrieval

    Randy L. Buckner;Wilma Koutstaal

  • Functional–Anatomic Study of Episodic Retrieval Using fMRI: I. Retrieval Effort versus Retrieval Success

    Randy L. Buckner;Wilma Koutstaal;Daniel L. Schacter;Anthony D. Wagner

  • Perceptual specificity in visual object priming: functional magnetic resonance imaging evidence for a laterality difference in fusiform cortex.

    W Koutstaal;A.D Wagner;A.D Wagner;M Rotte;A Maril

  • Functional MRI evidence for a role of frontal and inferior temporal cortex in amodal components of priming.

    Randy L. Buckner;Wilma Koutstaal;Daniel L. Schacter;Bruce R. Rosen

  • Functional-anatomic study of episodic retrieval. II. Selective averaging of event-related fMRI trials to test the retrieval success hypothesis.

    Randy L. Buckner;Randy L. Buckner;Wilma Koutstaal;Daniel L. Schacter;Anders M. Dale

  • When encoding yields remembering: insights from event-related neuroimaging.

    Anthony D. Wagner;Wilma Koutstaal;Daniel L. Schacter

  • Task-specific Repetition Priming in Left Inferior Prefrontal Cortex

    Anthony D. Wagner;Wilma Koutstaal;Anat Maril;Daniel L. Schacter

  • Neural mechanisms of visual object priming: evidence for perceptual and semantic distinctions in fusiform cortex

    Jon S. Simons;Wilma Koutstaal;Wilma Koutstaal;Steven E. Prince;Anthony D. Wagner

  • False memories and aging.

    Daniel L. Schacter;Wilma Koutstaal;Kenneth Andrew Norman

  • False recollection induced by photographs: a comparison of older and younger adults.

    Daniel L. Schacter;Wilma Koutstaal;Marcia K. Johnson;Mara S. Gross

  • Reducing gist-based false recognition in older adults: encoding and retrieval manipulations.

    Wilma Koutstaal;Daniel L. Schacter;Lissa Galluccio;Kathryn A. Stofer

  • Older Adults Encode—But Do Not Always Use—Perceptual Details Intentional Versus Unintentional Effects of Detail on Memory Judgments

    Wilma Koutstaal

  • Facilitation and impairment of event memory produced by photograph review.

    Wilma Koutstaal;Daniel L. Schacter;Marcia K. Johnson;Lissa Galluccio

  • Age and flexible thinking: an experimental demonstration of the beneficial effects of increased cognitively stimulating activity on fluid intelligence in healthy older adults

    Lesley J. Tranter;Wilma Koutstaal

  • False recognition of abstract versus common objects in older and younger adults: testing the semantic categorization account.

    Wilma Koutstaal;Chandan Reddy;Eric M. Jackson;Steve Prince

Frequent Co-Authors

Daniel L. Schacter
Daniel L. Schacter Harvard University
Randy L. Buckner
Randy L. Buckner Harvard University
Anthony D. Wagner
Anthony D. Wagner Stanford University
Michael Rotte
Michael Rotte Otto-von-Guericke University Magdeburg
Bruce R. Rosen
Bruce R. Rosen Harvard University
Yuhong V. Jiang
Yuhong V. Jiang University of Minnesota
Mieke Verfaellie
Mieke Verfaellie Boston University
Anders M. Dale
Anders M. Dale J. Craig Venter Institute
Kenneth A. Norman
Kenneth A. Norman Princeton University
Anthony J. Cleare
Anthony J. Cleare King's College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience often opens doors to a variety of related fields in psychology, social work, mental health, and therapy. As demand for mental health professionals grows, flexible education pathways are increasingly popular.

An online degree in psychology can provide foundational knowledge about human behavior and the brain, complementing many areas of neuroscience. For those interested in counseling or social services, pursuing an msw degree online (Master of Social Work) is an accessible route to clinical or community-focused roles.

If your goal is to become a practicing psychologist, accredited psyd programs usa offer advanced clinical training. Alternatively, those drawn to relationship counseling may consider online marriage and family therapy programs designed for quicker entry into the field.

Each of these online pathways provides unique career opportunities, flexibility, and the ability to tailor your education to specific interests within neuroscience and mental health.

Best Scientists Citing Wilma Koutstaal

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles