World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
46
Citations
8146
World Ranking
6873
National Ranking
111

Yael Edan publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yael Edan sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 236 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Yael Edan D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yael Edan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Yael Edan is affiliated with Ben-Gurion University of the Negev in Israel, focusing on interdisciplinary research spanning agricultural and biological sciences, psychology, and computer science. Their work encompasses several subfields including plant science, social psychology, artificial intelligence, ecology, and computer vision and pattern recognition.

Their research topics reflect a broad engagement with Smart Agriculture and AI, Social Robot Interaction and HRI (Human-Robot Interaction), AI in Service Interactions, Human-Automation Interaction and Safety, Remote Sensing in Agriculture, Spectroscopy and Chemometric Analyses, and Technology Use by Older Adults.

Yael Edan has co-authored publications with several researchers, most frequently collaborating with:

  • Samuel Olatunji
  • Tal Oron-Gilad
  • Galit Nimrod
  • Vardit Sarne-Fleischmann
  • Maya Krakovski

Their work has been published in a variety of venues, with multiple contributions in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
  • International Journal of Social Robotics
  • Applied Sciences
  • Precision Agriculture

Among their notable recent papers are:

  • "Development of a sweet pepper harvesting robot," 2020, Journal of Field Robotics
  • "Computer vision system for measuring individual cow feed intake using RGB-D camera and deep learning algorithms," 2020, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
  • "Biometric identification of sheep via a machine-vision system," 2022, Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
  • "Planning the sequence of tasks for harvesting robots," 2020, Robotics and Autonomous Systems
  • "In-Field Grape Cluster Size Assessment for Vine Yield Estimation Using a Mobile Robot and a Consumer Level RGB-D Camera," 2020, IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters

In addition to journal publications, Yael Edan has contributed to book publications, including a title published by Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing Limited titled "Advances in agri-food robotics" (2023).

Best Publications

  • Vision-based hand-gesture applications

    Juan Pablo Wachs;Mathias Kölsch;Helman Stern;Yael Edan

  • Harvesting Robots for High-value Crops: State-of-the-art Review and Challenges Ahead

    C. Wouter Bac;Eldert J. Henten;Jochen Hemming;Yael Edan

  • Development of a sweet pepper harvesting robot

    Boaz Arad;Jos Balendonck;Ruud Barth;Ohad Ben-Shahar

  • Computer vision for fruit harvesting robots state of the art and challenges ahead

    Keren Kapach;Ehud Barnea;Rotem Mairon;Yael Edan

  • A Gesture-based Tool for Sterile Browsing of Radiology Images

    Juan P. Wachs;Helman I. Stern;Yael Edan;Michael Gillam

  • Automation in Agriculture

    Yael Edan;Shufeng Han;Naoshi Kondo

  • Robotic melon harvesting

    Y. Edan;D. Rogozin;T. Flash;G.E. Miles

  • Grape clusters and foliage detection algorithms for autonomous selective vineyard sprayer

    Ron Berenstein;Ohad Ben Shahar;Amir Shapiro;Yael Edan

  • Development of automatic body condition scoring using a low-cost 3-dimensional Kinect camera

    Roii Spoliansky;Yael Edan;Yisrael Parmet;Ilan Halachmi;Ilan Halachmi

  • Computer vision system for measuring individual cow feed intake using RGB-D camera and deep learning algorithms

    Ran Bezen;Yael Edan;Ilan Halachmi

  • IMAGE–PROCESSING ALGORITHMS FOR TOMATO CLASSIFICATION

    S. Laykin;V. Alchanatis;E. Fallik;Y. Edan

  • Near-minimum-time task planning for fruit-picking robots

    Y. Edan;T. Flash;U.M. Peiper;I. Shmulevich

  • Human‐robot collaboration for improved target recognition of agricultural robots

    Avital Bechar;Yael Edan

  • Cluster labeling and parameter estimation for the automated setup of a hand-gesture recognition system

    J.P. Wachs;H. Stern;Y. Edan

  • Development of an automatic cow body condition scoring using body shape signature and Fourier descriptors

    A. Bercovich;Y. Edan;V. Alchanatis;U. Moallem

  • Design and development of a semi‐autonomous agricultural vineyard sprayer: Human–robot interaction aspects

    George Adamides;Christos Katsanos;Christos Katsanos;Ioannis Constantinou;Georgios Christou

  • Evaluation of automatic guided vehicle systems

    Sigal Berman;Edna Schechtman;Yael Edan

  • Biometric identification of sheep via a machine-vision system

    Unknown

  • Navigation of decentralized autonomous automatic guided vehicles in material handling

    S. Berman;Y. Edan;M. Jamshidi

  • DESIGNING HAND GESTURE VOCABULARIES FOR NATURAL INTERACTION BY COMBINING PSYCHO-PHYSIOLOGICAL AND RECOGNITION FACTORS

    Helman I. Stern;Juan P. Wachs;Yael Edan

  • Systems engineering of agricultural robot design

    Y. Edan;G.E. Miles

  • Decentralized autonomous AGV system for material handling

    S. Berman;Y. Edan

  • Automatic Adjustable Spraying Device for Site-Specific Agricultural Application

    Ron Berenstein;Yael Edan

  • HRI usability evaluation of interaction modes for a teleoperated agricultural robotic sprayer

    George Adamides;Christos Katsanos;Yisrael Parmet;Georgios Christou

Frequent Co-Authors

Ilan Halachmi
Ilan Halachmi Agricultural Research Organization
Ephraim Maltz
Ephraim Maltz Agricultural Research Organization
Shimon Y. Nof
Shimon Y. Nof Purdue University West Lafayette
U. Moallem
U. Moallem Agricultural Research Organization
Tamar Flash
Tamar Flash Weizmann Institute of Science
Wouter Saeys
Wouter Saeys KU Leuven
Galit Nimrod
Galit Nimrod Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
Mo Jamshidi
Mo Jamshidi The University of Texas at San Antonio
Bernard A. Engel
Bernard A. Engel Purdue University West Lafayette
Martin Riis Weisbjerg
Martin Riis Weisbjerg Aarhus University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science in the USA opens up opportunities to branch into other high-demand STEM fields. If you’re considering complementary or alternative online degrees, options like a cheapest mechanical engineering degree online provide a practical path for those interested in applying software solutions to real-world engineering problems.

For those passionate about understanding the physical universe and data analysis, an online physics bachelor's degree can strengthen your analytical skills and broaden your STEM knowledge. With the rise of big data, pursuing a data science learning path offers a direct route to careers in analytics, AI, and machine learning—all closely linked with computer science expertise.

Additionally, expanding your skill set through an online bachelor’s in electrical engineering can open doors in embedded systems, robotics, and telecommunications. These related online degrees enable you to tailor your learning to specific tech sectors and help launch rewarding, flexible career pathways in the evolving digital world.

Best Scientists Citing Yael Edan

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles