World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
34
Citations
5544
World Ranking
10158
National Ranking
5351

William J. Hoyer publications per year

1969: 1 publications 1970: 2 publications 1971: 1 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 3 publications 1974: 5 publications 1975: 5 publications 1976: 1 publications 1977: 4 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 4 publications 1980: 12 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 2 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 1 publications 1986: 7 publications 1987: 1 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 8 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 3 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 1 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 2 publications 2010: 1 publications 2011: 1 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 1 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 1 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 1 publications
1969 2019

131 publications in total across all disciplines

William J. Hoyer publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Hoyer sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 115 publications — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

William J. Hoyer D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William J. Hoyer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1986 - Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA)

Overview

William J. Hoyer is affiliated with Syracuse University in the United States. Their academic career is marked by contributions within the broader field of psychology, as indicated by recognition from a prominent professional organization.

In 1986, William J. Hoyer was awarded the title of Fellow of the American Psychological Association (APA). This distinction formalizes their involvement in the discipline and aligns with a level of professional acknowledgment within the psychological research community.

Details regarding their specific research topics, subfields of study, frequent co-authors, recent papers, publication venues, and books are not provided. Therefore, no further information about the focus or scope of their scientific work can be outlined.

Best Publications

  • Age, Sex, and Social Factors in Fear of Crime

    Margaret M. Braungart;Richard G. Braungart;William J. Hoyer

  • Adult cognition and aging : developmental changes in processing, knowing and thinking

    John M. Rybash;William J. Hoyer;Paul Roodin

  • Adult information processing : limits on loss

    John Cerella;John M. Rybash;William J. Hoyer;Michael L. Commons

  • Adult development and aging

    William J. Hoyer;Paul A. Roodin

  • Age and the selectivity of visual information processing.

    Dana J. Plude;William J. Hoyer

  • Adult age differences in implicit and explicit memory: time course and encoding effects.

    Christine Chiarello;William J. Hoyer

  • Adult age and digit symbol substitution performance: a meta-analysis.

    William J. Hoyer;Robert S. Stawski;Christina Wasylyshyn;Paul Verhaeghen

  • Aging and shifts of visual spatial attention.

    Charles L. Folk;William J. Hoyer

  • Aging selectively impairs recollection in recognition memory for pictures: evidence from modeling and receiver operating characteristic curves.

    Marc W. Howard;Brandy Bessette-Symons;Yaofei Zhang;William J. Hoyer

  • Accuracy and Qualities of Real and Suggested Memories Nonspecific Age Differences

    Mara E. Karpel;William J. Hoyer;Michael P. Toglia

  • Adult Age Differences in Visual Search as a Function of Stimulus Mapping and Processing Load

    Dana J. Plude;William J. Hoyer

  • Modification of response speed deficits and intellectual performance in the elderly

    W. J. Hoyer;Gisela V. Labouvie;Paul B. Baltes

  • Effects of Varying Irrelevant Information on Adult Age Differences in Problem Solving

    William J. Hoyer;George W. Rebok;Susan Marx Sved

  • Application of Operant Techniques to the Modification of Elderly Behavior

    William J. Hoyer

  • Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial representations: a reappraisal.

    John M. Rybash;William J. Hoyer

  • Age and Skill in Visual Search.

    Stephanie M. Clancy;William J. Hoyer

  • Adult cognition and aging

    John M. Rybash;William J. Hoyer;Paul A. Roodin

  • Processing Consequences of Perceptual Grouping in Selective Attention

    Mitchell S. Farkas;William J. Hoyer

  • Ten – Memory Aging

    William J. Hoyer;Paul Verhaeghen

  • Adult age differences in implicit and explicit memory: Time course and encoding effects.

    Unknown

  • Intellectual Functioning in Adults

    William J. Hoyer;Nancy L. Mergler;Mitchell Farkas;Norman Schultz

  • Psychology of Adult Development and Aging

    Marcia Q. Garwood;William J. Hoyer

  • Learning in Adulthood

    William J. Hoyer;Dayna R. Touron

Frequent Co-Authors

Paul Verhaeghen
Paul Verhaeghen Georgia Institute of Technology
Paul B. Baltes
Paul B. Baltes Max Planck Institute for Human Development
Marc W. Howard
Marc W. Howard Boston University
Christine Chiarello
Christine Chiarello University of California, Riverside
Charles L. Folk
Charles L. Folk Villanova University
Margret M. Baltes
Margret M. Baltes Freie Universität Berlin
Richard M. Lerner
Richard M. Lerner Tufts University
Robert S. Stawski
Robert S. Stawski Utah State University
Gisela Labouvie-Vief
Gisela Labouvie-Vief University of Geneva
Susan Krauss Whitbourne
Susan Krauss Whitbourne University of Massachusetts Amherst

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're considering a career in psychology, there are many online degree programs to help you start or advance your journey. Online psychology degrees offer flexibility and access to accredited coursework, making them ideal for students balancing school, work, and other responsibilities.

Many psychology graduates choose to become licensed professional counselors (LPCs). However, licensure requirements can differ significantly depending on your state. For example, the lpc licensure requirements in South Dakota include a master's degree, supervised experience, and passing a state exam. Similarly, Tennessee lpc licensure requirements set out specific education and examination criteria.

If you plan to practice in Texas, it's vital to review the Texas licensed professional counselor requirements. Utah also has distinct lpc license requirements in Utah that aspiring professionals should understand before enrolling in an online program.

Carefully researching your state's licensing requirements will help you choose the right online psychology degree and set you on a rewarding path in mental health counseling and related roles.

Best Scientists Citing William J. Hoyer

Recently Published Articles