World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 78 1561 1395 933 813 213 27586

Scott W. Henggeler publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott W. Henggeler between 1978 and 2019, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott W. Henggeler published across 42 years, from 1978 to 2019, averaging 5.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 18 publications in 2012. 3 of the 224 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1978 to 2019. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 18. Peak 18 publications in 2012. 1978: 1 publication 1979: 2 publications 1980: 5 publications 1981: 2 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 3 publications 1984: 4 publications 1985: 4 publications 1986: 6 publications 1987: 8 publications 1988: 3 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 10 publications 1991: 3 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 6 publications 1994: 5 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 7 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 10 publications 2000: 9 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 12 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 18 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 1 publication 2019: 2 publications
1978 2019

224 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott W. Henggeler: publications per year, 1978 to 2019
Year Publications
1978 1
1979 2
1980 5
1981 2
1982 0
1983 3
1984 4
1985 4
1986 6
1987 8
1988 3
1989 4
1990 10
1991 3
1992 6
1993 6
1994 5
1995 6
1996 8
1997 7
1998 4
1999 10
2000 9
2001 6
2002 8
2003 7
2004 7
2005 7
2006 5
2007 3
2008 12
2009 6
2010 6
2011 6
2012 18
2013 4
2014 3
2015 3
2016 3
2017 1
2018 1
2019 2
Total 224
Download as CSV

Scott W. Henggeler publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott W. Henggeler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 211–220 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 213 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313 213
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Scott W. Henggeler D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott W. Henggeler sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 78–79 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 78 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137 78
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Scott W. Henggeler is affiliated with the Medical University of South Carolina in the United States. The academic profile indicates engagement in scientific research, although specific publications, research topics, or fields of study have not been listed in the available data.

No recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues have been documented. Additionally, there are no records of book publications or awards associated with their name in the provided information.

Due to the absence of detailed data on research areas or thematic focuses, it is not possible to outline specific fields or subfields of study connected to Scott W. Henggeler. Similarly, no main topics of work can be identified or enumerated from the current records.

The information confirms that Scott W. Henggeler is currently living, and no information suggests otherwise. The academic background appears to be linked to medical or health sciences given their institutional affiliation, but detailed specifics are not available.

Overall, the profile reflects a lack of publicly documented research outputs or collaborations in the source data rather than any particular specialization or scholarly contributions.

Best Publications

  • Multisystemic therapy for antisocial behavior in children and adolescents

    Scott W. Henggeler

  • Family preservation using multisystemic therapy: an effective alternative to incarcerating serious juvenile offenders.

    Scott W. Henggeler;Gary B. Melton;Linda A. Smith

  • Multisystemic Treatment of Antisocial Behavior in Children and Adolescents

    Scott W. Henggeler;Sonja K. Schoenwald;Charles M. Borduin;Melisa D. Rowland

  • Multisystemic therapy with violent and chronic juvenile offenders and their families: The role of treatment fidelity in successful dissemination.

    Scott W. Henggeler;Gary B. Melton;Michael J. Brondino;David G. Scherer

  • Multisystemic treatment of serious juvenile offenders: Long-term prevention of criminality and violence

    Charles M. Borduin;Barton J. Mann;Lynn T. Cone;Scott W. Henggeler

  • Family therapy and beyond : a multisystemic approach to treating the behavior problems of children and adolescents

    Scott W. Henggeler;Charles M. Borduin

  • Mechanisms of change in multisystemic therapy: Reducing delinquent behavior through therapist adherence and improved family and peer functioning.

    Stanley J. Huey;Scott W. Henggeler;Michael J. Brondino;Susan G. Pickrel

  • Multisystemic Treatment of Adolescent Sexual Offenders

    Charles M. Borduin;Scott W. Henggeler;David M. Blaske;Risa J. Stein

  • Four-year follow-up of multisystemic therapy with substance-abusing and substance-dependent juvenile offenders.

    Scott W. Henggeler;W. Glenn Clingempeel;Michael J. Brondino;Susan G. Pickrel

  • Multisystemic treatment of serious juvenile offenders: long-term prevention of criminality and violence.

    Unknown

  • Multisystemic treatment of substance-abusing and dependent delinquents: outcomes, treatment fidelity, and transportability.

    Scott W. Henggeler;Susan G. Pickrel;Michael J. Brondino

  • Comparison of multisystemic therapy and parent training in the brief treatment of child abuse and neglect.

    Molly A. Brunk;Scott W. Henggeler;James P. Whelan

  • Multisystemic Treatment of Juvenile Offenders: Effects on Adolescent Behavior and Family Interaction.

    Scott W. Henggeler;J. Douglas Rodick;Charles M. Borduin;Cindy L. Hanson

  • Family preservation using multisystemic treatment: Long-term follow-up to a clinical trial with serious juvenile offenders

    Scott W. Henggeler;Gary B. Melton;Linda A. Smith;Sonja K. Schoenwald

  • Multisystemic therapy effects on attempted suicide by youths presenting psychiatric emergencies

    Stanley J. Huey;Scott W. Henggeler;Melisa D. Rowland;Colleen A. Halliday-Boykins

  • Individual, family, and peer characteristics of adolescent sex offenders and assaultive offenders.

    David M. Blaske;Charles M. Borduin;Scott W. Henggeler;Barton J. Mann

  • Juvenile drug court: Enhancing outcomes by integrating evidence-based treatments.

    Scott W. Henggeler;Colleen A. Halliday-Boykins;Phillippe B. Cunningham;Jeff Randall

  • Home-based multisystemic therapy as an alternative to the hospitalization of youths in psychiatric crisis: clinical outcomes.

    Scott W. Henggeler;Melisa D. Rowland;Jeff Randall;David M. Ward

  • Multisystemic Therapy for Juvenile Sexual Offenders: 1-Year Results from a Randomized Effectiveness Trial

    Elizabeth J. Letourneau;Scott W. Henggeler;Charles M. Borduin;Paul A. Schewe

  • Effects of multisystemic therapy on drug use and abuse in serious juvenile offenders: A progress report from two outcome studies.

    Scott W. Henggeler;Charles M. Borduin;Gary B. Melton;Barton J. Mann

  • Multisystemic Treatment of Antisocial Behavior in Children and Adolescents. Treatment Manuals for Practitioners.

    Scott W. Henggeler;Sonja K. Schoenwald;Charles M. Borduin;Melisa D. Rowland

Frequent Co-Authors

Charles M. Borduin
Charles M. Borduin University of Missouri
Sonja K. Schoenwald
Sonja K. Schoenwald Medical University of South Carolina
Gary B. Melton
Gary B. Melton University of Colorado Denver
David M. Ward
David M. Ward Montana State University
Elizabeth J. Letourneau
Elizabeth J. Letourneau Johns Hopkins University
James Whelan
James Whelan La Trobe University
Julian D. Ford
Julian D. Ford University of Connecticut
Robert C. Klesges
Robert C. Klesges University of Virginia
John R. Weisz
John R. Weisz Harvard University
James F. Sallis
James F. Sallis University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring different online psychology degree options opens the door to specialized career pathways, such as becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst (BCBA). As demand for BCBAs rises, understanding state-specific education and certification requirements becomes crucial. bcba certification requirements in Phoenix provide insight into the coursework, practical experience, and supervised hours needed for licensure.

Requirements vary based on location. For example, Pittsburgh bcba requirements emphasize local regulations and state board guidelines, while Plano bcba education requirements detail educational prerequisites and fieldwork unique to Texas. Similarly, Port St. Lucie bcba education requirements outline Florida-specific steps for aspiring BCBAs.

Whether you hope to work in schools, clinics, or community agencies, online psychology programs can be tailored to meet the evolving standards across the country. Researching regional requirements ensures you are on the right path toward licensure and a rewarding career in behavioral analysis.

Best Scientists Citing Scott W. Henggeler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles