World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 46 6482 6036 3508 3186 111 7154

Julia D. Grant publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julia D. Grant between 1997 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julia D. Grant published across 27 years, from 1997 to 2023, averaging 4.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 14 publications in 2015. 1 of the 114 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 14. Peak 14 publications in 2015. 1997: 1 publication 1998: 0 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 8 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 6 publications 2014: 4 publications 2015: 14 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 2 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 1 publication 2021: 0 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication
1997 2023

114 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julia D. Grant: publications per year, 1997 to 2023
Year Publications
1997 1
1998 0
1999 4
2000 2
2001 2
2002 1
2003 3
2004 2
2005 5
2006 7
2007 2
2008 5
2009 8
2010 9
2011 9
2012 9
2013 6
2014 4
2015 14
2016 10
2017 6
2018 2
2019 1
2020 1
2021 0
2022 0
2023 1
Total 114
Download as CSV

Julia D. Grant publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia D. Grant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 111–120 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 111 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686 111
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Julia D. Grant D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julia D. Grant sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 46–47 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495 46
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Julia D. Grant is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research spans several fields within the social sciences, focusing particularly on clinical psychology and education, with additional work in cognitive neuroscience, pediatrics, perinatology, child health, and political science and international relations.

The primary topics covered in their research include autism spectrum disorder, family and disability support, child development and digital technology, prenatal substance exposure effects, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, early childhood education, and international law and human rights.

Grant has contributed to multiple publications, including:

  • "Genetic architecture of reciprocal social behavior in toddlers: Implications for heterogeneity in the early origins of autism spectrum disorder" (2020) published in Development and Psychopathology
  • "The Association of Low Parental Monitoring With Early Substance Use in European American and African American Adolescent Girls" (2020) published by UNC Libraries
  • "A Clash of Constitutional Covenants: Reconciling State Sovereign Immunity and Just Compensation" (2023) published in SSRN Electronic Journal

Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Andrew C. Heath
  • Natasha Marrus
  • Brooke Harris-Olenak
  • Jordan Albright
  • Drew Bolster

Grant's work has appeared in venues such as Development and Psychopathology, UNC Libraries, and SSRN Electronic Journal.

Best Publications

  • Gender Identity, Sexual Orientation, and Eating-Related Pathology in a National Sample of College Students

    Elizabeth W. Diemer;Julia D. Grant;Melissa A. Munn-Chernoff;David A. Patterson

  • Adolescent alcohol use is a risk factor for adult alcohol and drug dependence: evidence from a twin design.

    Julia D. Grant;Jeffrey F. Scherrer;Michael T. Lynskey;Michael J. Lyons

  • Heritability of Delay Discounting in Adolescence: A Longitudinal Twin Study

    Andrey P. Anokhin;Simon Golosheykin;Julia D. Grant;Andrew C. Heath

  • Contributions of parental alcoholism, prenatal substance exposure, and genetic transmission to child ADHD risk: a female twin study

    Valerie S. Knopik;Elizabeth P. Sparrow;Pamela A. F. Madden;Kathleen K. Bucholz

  • Common genetic and environmental contributions to post-traumatic stress disorder and alcohol dependence in young women.

    C. E. Sartor;V. V. McCutcheon;N. E. Pommer;E. C. Nelson

  • Social phobia in a population-based female adolescent twin sample: co-morbidity and associated suicide-related symptoms.

    E. C. Nelson;J. D. Grant;K. K. Bucholz;A. Glowinski

  • Common heritable contributions to low-risk trauma, high-risk trauma, posttraumatic stress disorder, and major depression

    Carolyn E. Sartor;Julia D. Grant;Michael T. Lynskey;Vivia V. McCutcheon

  • A quantitative-trait genome-wide association study of alcoholism risk in the community: findings and implications.

    Andrew C. Heath;John B. Whitfield;Nicholas G. Martin;Michele L. Pergadia

  • The effects of maternal smoking during pregnancy on offspring outcomes

    Arpana Agrawal;Jeffrey F Scherrer;Jeffrey F Scherrer;Julia D Grant;Carolyn E Sartor

  • Resiliency Factors Protecting against Teenage Alcohol Use and Smoking: Influences of Religion, Religious Involvement and Values, and Ethnicity in the Missouri Adolescent Female Twin Study

    Andrew C. Heath;Pamela A. F. Madden;Julia D. Grant;T. L. McLaughlin

  • The Genetics of Impulsivity: Evidence for the Heritability of Delay Discounting

    Andrey P. Anokhin;Julia D. Grant;Richard C. Mulligan;Andrew C. Heath

  • Risk for initiation of substance use as a function of age of onset of cigarette, alcohol and cannabis use: findings in a Midwestern female twin cohort.

    Arpana Agrawal;Julia D. Grant;Mary Waldron;Alexis E. Duncan

  • Assortative mating for Cigarette Smoking and for Alcohol Consumption in Female Australian Twins and their Spouses

    Arpana Agrawal;Andrew C. Heath;Julia D. Grant;Michele L. Pergadia

  • Spousal concordance for alcohol dependence: evidence for assortative mating or spousal interaction effects?

    Julia D. Grant;Andrew C. Heath;Kathleen K. Bucholz;Pamela A.F. Madden

  • The association between cannabis abuse and dependence and childhood physical and sexual abuse: Evidence from an offspring of twins design

    Alexis E. Duncan;Carolyn E. Sartor;Carolyn E. Sartor;Jeffrey F. Scherrer;Jeffrey F. Scherrer;Julia D. Grant

  • Age and Ethnic Differences in the Onset, Persistence and Recurrence of Alcohol Use Disorder

    Julia D. Grant;Alvaro Vergés;Alvaro Vergés;Kristina M. Jackson;Timothy J. Trull;Timothy J. Trull

  • Associations of Alcohol, Nicotine, Cannabis, and Drug Use/Dependence with Educational Attainment: Evidence from Cotwin‐Control Analyses

    Julia D. Grant;Jeffrey F. Scherrer;Jeffrey F. Scherrer;Michael T. Lynskey;Arpana Agrawal

  • Deconstructing the Age-Prevalence Curve of Alcohol Dependence: Why “Maturing Out” is only a Small Piece of the Puzzle

    Alvaro Vergés;Kristina M. Jackson;Kathleen K. Bucholz;Julia D. Grant

  • A comparison of the latent class structure of cannabis problems among adult men and women who have used cannabis repeatedly

    Julia D. Grant;Jeffrey F. Scherrer;Rosalind J. Neuman;Alexandre A. Todorov

  • Evidence for an Interaction Between Age at First Drink and Genetic Influences on DSM‐IV Alcohol Dependence Symptoms

    Arpana Agrawal;Carolyn E. Sartor;Michael T. Lynskey;Julia D. Grant

Frequent Co-Authors

Kathleen K. Bucholz
Kathleen K. Bucholz Washington University in St. Louis
Pamela A. F. Madden
Pamela A. F. Madden Washington University in St. Louis
Andrew C. Heath
Andrew C. Heath Washington University in St. Louis
Carolyn E. Sartor
Carolyn E. Sartor Yale University
Arpana Agrawal
Arpana Agrawal Washington University in St. Louis
Michael T. Lynskey
Michael T. Lynskey King's College London
Nicholas G. Martin
Nicholas G. Martin QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute
Theodore Jacob
Theodore Jacob Veterans Health Administration
Hong Xian
Hong Xian Saint Louis University
Dixie J. Statham
Dixie J. Statham Federation University Australia

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens doors to various online programs and specialized career paths. Many students aim to become Licensed Professional Counselors (LPCs), but licensure requirements differ significantly by state. For instance, the lpc licensure requirements in Vermont have specific steps regarding education, supervised experience, and examinations.

If you plan to work in Virginia, familiarize yourself with the lpc license requirements in Virginia, which outline required coursework and state-specific licensing exams. Aspiring counselors in Washington need to know how to get an lpc license in Washington, including the required credit hours and supervised practice under a qualified professional.

For those interested in practicing in West Virginia, the lpc license requirements in West Virginia highlight the importance of regionally-accredited programs and ongoing professional development.

Each state’s licensure process has unique standards, so researching your target state early is essential. Choosing the right online degree program aligned with state regulations will help you advance confidently toward your professional counseling career.

Best Scientists Citing Julia D. Grant

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles