World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Engineering and Technology

D-Index
38
Citations
5347
World Ranking
8104
National Ranking
2237

Daniel P. Lathrop publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel P. Lathrop sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 804+

This scientist: 230 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

Daniel P. Lathrop D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel P. Lathrop sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 20th percentile

20% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2011 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Daniel P. Lathrop is affiliated with the University of Maryland, College Park in the United States. Their research spans multiple areas within physics and engineering, with a particular focus on phenomena involving quantum mechanics, magnetism, and fluid dynamics.

The primary fields of study for this researcher include Physics and Astronomy, as well as Engineering. More specifically, their work touches on several subfields:

  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics
  • Statistical and Nonlinear Physics
  • Molecular Biology
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence

Key topics covered by Daniel P. Lathrop include:

  • Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism Studies
  • Quantum chaos and dynamical systems
  • Quantum and electron transport phenomena
  • Ferroelectric and Negative Capacitance Devices
  • Quantum Mechanics and Non-Hermitian Physics
  • Nonlinear Waves and Solitons
  • Magnetic properties of thin films

The researcher has produced a range of papers published in notable venues, including arXiv (Cornell University), Physical Review Applied, Physical Review Research, and others. Some selected recent publications are:

  • "Fluid Dynamics Experiments for Planetary Interiors," 2022, Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
  • "Programmable electrical coupling between stochastic magnetic tunnel junctions," 2024, Physical Review Applied
  • "Topology and manipulation of scattering singularities in complex non-Hermitian systems: Two-channel case," 2025, Physical Review Research
  • "Experimental study of rough spherical Couette flows: Increasing helicity toward a dynamo state," 2021, Physical Review Fluids
  • "Measurement-driven Langevin modeling of superparamagnetic tunnel junctions," 2024, Physical Review Applied

Frequent collaborators in their research include Sidra Gibeault, Temitayo N. Adeyeye, Matthew W. Daniels, M. D. Stiles, and Jabez J. McClelland.

Daniel P. Lathrop has published multiple articles in recurring journals, with a strong presence in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Physical Review Applied
  • Geophysics
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
  • Physical Review Research

In 2011, they were recognized as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS).

Best Publications

  • Superfluid helium: visualization of quantized vortices.

    Gregory P. Bewley;Gregory P. Bewley;Daniel P. Lathrop;Katepalli R. Sreenivasan;Katepalli R. Sreenivasan

  • Transition to shear-driven turbulence in Couette-Taylor flow.

    Daniel P. Lathrop;Jay Fineberg;Harry L. Swinney

  • Singularity dynamics in curvature collapse and jet eruption on a fluid surface

    Benjamin W. Zeff;Benjamin Kleber;Jay Fineberg;Daniel P. Lathrop

  • Velocity Statistics Distinguish Quantum Turbulence from Classical Turbulence

    M. S. Paoletti;Michael E. Fisher;K. R. Sreenivasan;K. R. Sreenivasan;D. P. Lathrop

  • Characterization of reconnecting vortices in superfluid helium.

    Gregory P. Bewley;Matthew S. Paoletti;Katepalli R. Sreenivasan;Daniel P. Lathrop

  • Experimental Observation and Characterization of the Magnetorotational Instability

    Daniel R. Sisan;Nicolás Mujica;W. Andrew Tillotson;Yi Min Huang

  • Turbulent flow between concentric rotating cylinders at large Reynolds number.

    Daniel P. Lathrop;Jay Fineberg;Harry L. Swinney

  • Direct observation of Kelvin waves excited by quantized vortex reconnection

    Enrico Fonda;David P. Meichle;Nicholas T. Ouellette;Sahand Hormoz

  • Measuring intense rotation and dissipation in turbulent flows

    Benjamin W. Zeff;Daniel D. Lanterman;Ryan McAllister;Rajarshi Roy

  • Angular momentum transport in turbulent flow between independently rotating cylinders.

    M. S. Paoletti;D. P. Lathrop

  • Drag Reduction in Bubbly Taylor-Couette Turbulence

    Thomas H. van den Berg;Stefan Luther;Daniel P. Lathrop;Detlef Lohse

  • Visualization of two-fluid flows of superfluid helium-4.

    Wei Guo;Marco La Mantia;Daniel P. Lathrop;Steven W. Van Sciver

  • Viscous effects in droplet-ejecting capillary waves

    Christopher L. Goodridge;W. Tao Shi;H. G. E. Hentschel;Daniel P. Lathrop

  • Toward a self-generating magnetic dynamo: the role of turbulence

    Nicholas L. Peffley;A. B. Cawthorne;Daniel P. Lathrop

  • The Twente turbulent Taylor-Couette (T3C) facility: strongly turbulent (multiphase) flow between two independently rotating cylinders.

    Dennis Paulus Maria van Gils;Gert-Wim Bruggert;Daniel P. Lathrop;Chao Sun

  • Reconnection dynamics for quantized vortices

    M.S. Paoletti;Michael E. Fisher;D.P. Lathrop

  • Visualization of Superfluid Helium Flow

    Matthew S. Paoletti;Ralph B. Fiorito;Katepalli R. Sreenivasan;Katepalli R. Sreenivasan;Daniel P. Lathrop

  • Threshold dynamics of singular gravity-capillary waves.

    Christopher L. Goodridge;W. Tao Shi;Daniel P. Lathrop

  • Bubbly turbulent drag reduction is a boundary layer effect.

    Th.H. van den Berg;Dennis Paulus Maria van Gils;Daniel P. Lathrop;Detlef Lohse

  • Inertial waves driven by differential rotation in a planetary geometry

    Douglas H. Kelley;Santiago Andrés Triana;Daniel S. Zimmerman;Andreas Tilgner

  • Nonlinear Dynamics and Chaos: With Applications to Physics, Biology, Chemistry, and Engineering

    Daniel Lathrop

  • Experimental Observation and Characterization of the Magnetorotational Instability

    Daniel S. Zimmerman;Daniel R. Sisan;Nicolás Mujica;William Dorland

Frequent Co-Authors

Katepalli R. Sreenivasan
Katepalli R. Sreenivasan New York University
Detlef Lohse
Detlef Lohse University of Twente
Michael E. Fisher
Michael E. Fisher University of Maryland, College Park
Jay Fineberg
Jay Fineberg Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Chao Sun
Chao Sun Tsinghua University
Brian R. Hunt
Brian R. Hunt University of Maryland, College Park
Edward Ott
Edward Ott University of Maryland, College Park
Nicholas T. Ouellette
Nicholas T. Ouellette Stanford University
Thomas M. Antonsen
Thomas M. Antonsen University of Maryland, College Park
James Drake
James Drake University of Maryland, College Park

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Engineering and Technology opens up a variety of flexible options. Many students are looking for accelerated programs to fast-track their careers. For those eager to quickly advance, consider a master degree in 6 months. These intensive programs are designed for driven individuals seeking a rapid path to high-level positions.

If you’re interested in credentials that pay off quickly, there are 12 month certificate programs that pay well. These certificates can provide specialized skills for in-demand jobs, often without the time and expense of a full degree.

Online learning is also a great fit for busy parents. There are excellent degrees for stay at home moms who need the flexibility to balance family and education. Study at your own pace and open up new career options from home.

For those needing results even faster, look at 6 week certificate programs online. These short-term courses are perfect for skill upgrades or exploring new specialties in a matter of weeks.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel P. Lathrop

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles