World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tatyana B. Nesterova

Tatyana B. Nesterova

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Molecular Biology 41 3047 2771 236 216 114 10108

Tatyana B. Nesterova publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Tatyana B. Nesterova between 1987 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Tatyana B. Nesterova published across 40 years, from 1987 to 2026, averaging 3.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 9 publications in 1993. 6 of the 129 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6 8
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 9. Peak 9 publications in 1993. 1987: 3 publications 1988: 6 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 8 publications 1992: 2 publications 1993: 9 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 5 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 5 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 2 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 1 publication 2019: 5 publications 2020: 3 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 1 publication 2024: 4 publications 2025: 5 publications 2026: 1 publication
1987 2026

129 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Tatyana B. Nesterova: publications per year, 1987 to 2026
Year Publications
1987 3
1988 6
1989 1
1990 1
1991 8
1992 2
1993 9
1994 7
1995 2
1996 1
1997 5
1998 6
1999 1
2000 0
2001 6
2002 5
2003 2
2004 5
2005 1
2006 1
2007 3
2008 5
2009 1
2010 2
2011 4
2012 0
2013 1
2014 2
2015 4
2016 6
2017 3
2018 1
2019 5
2020 3
2021 6
2022 0
2023 1
2024 4
2025 5
2026 1
Total 129
Download as CSV

Tatyana B. Nesterova publications per year - data summary

  • Tatyana B. Nesterova, a Molecular Biology scholar from University of Oxford, has 129 publications recorded across 40 years, from 1987 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1987 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 1993, with 9 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1989, 1990, 1996, 1999 and others, with 1 publication each.
  • 3 of the 40 years in the span carry no publications at all (2000, 2012 and 2022).
  • The rate of publication averages 3.2 papers per year over the whole span, or 3.5 per year counting only the 37 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 11 publications, 9% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1987-2000: 52 publications (3.7 per year); 2001-2014: 38 publications (2.7 per year); 2015-2026: 39 publications (3.3 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Tatyana B. Nesterova publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tatyana B. Nesterova sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 53 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 47–56 to 564+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 177. Most scientists, 177, have 117–126 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 107–116 publications, is where this scientist sits. 47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47–56 publications 564+

This scientist: 114 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
47–56 7
57–66 17
67–76 65
77–86 90
87–96 125
97–106 131
107–116 162 114
117–126 177
127–136 158
137–146 158
147–156 146
157–166 159
167–176 131
177–186 110
187–196 112
197–206 100
207–216 89
217–226 98
227–236 74
237–246 72
247–256 63
257–266 53
267–276 54
277–286 49
287–296 52
297–306 43
307–316 46
317–326 41
327–336 42
337–346 31
347–356 28
357–366 29
367–376 26
377–386 24
387–396 24
397–406 14
407–416 13
417–426 20
427–436 12
437–446 20
447–456 11
457–466 10
467–476 14
477–486 14
487–496 10
497–506 13
507–516 13
517–526 2
527–536 4
537–546 6
547–556 8
557–563 6
564+ 100
Download as CSV

Tatyana B. Nesterova publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,076 Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 53 ranges running from 47–56 to 564+ publications.
  • Tatyana B. Nesterova, a Molecular Biology scholar from University of Oxford, records 114 publications - the 18th percentile of the discipline.
  • 18% of ranked Molecular Biology scientists score the same or lower than Tatyana B. Nesterova, and about 82% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 177–186 publications range, and Tatyana B. Nesterova ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 117–126 publications, holding 177 scientists (6% of the field).
  • 53% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 177–186 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 564 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Tatyana B. Nesterova D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tatyana B. Nesterova sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100 125
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 145+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 131. Most scientists, 131, have 64–65 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40–41 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Molecular Biology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,076 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 36 41
42–43 101
44–45 115
46–47 121
48–49 118
50–51 130
52–53 106
54–55 116
56–57 113
58–59 129
60–61 120
62–63 105
64–65 131
66–67 95
68–69 97
70–71 106
72–73 83
74–75 89
76–77 77
78–79 70
80–81 73
82–83 60
84–85 48
86–87 45
88–89 50
90–91 31
92–93 51
94–95 43
96–97 38
98–99 39
100–101 41
102–103 29
104–105 33
106–107 35
108–109 20
110–111 38
112–113 19
114–115 28
116–117 13
118–119 23
120–121 16
122–123 15
124–125 11
126–127 21
128–129 7
130–131 13
132–133 14
134–135 17
136–137 9
138–139 8
140–141 16
142–143 7
144 7
145+ 100
Download as CSV

Tatyana B. Nesterova D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,076 Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 54 ranges running from 40–41 to 145+ D-Index.
  • Tatyana B. Nesterova, a Molecular Biology scholar from University of Oxford, records 41 D-Index - the 1st percentile of the discipline.
  • 1% of ranked Molecular Biology scientists score the same or lower than Tatyana B. Nesterova, and about 99% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 68–69 D-Index range, and Tatyana B. Nesterova ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 64–65 D-Index, holding 131 scientists (4% of the field).
  • 50% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 66–67 D-Index), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Overview

Tatyana B. Nesterova is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a total of 35 publications. Within these, their work is especially concentrated in molecular biology, genetics, cancer research, ecology, and plant science.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • RNA research and splicing
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Genetic and clinical aspects of sex determination and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Genomics and chromatin dynamics
  • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • CRISPR and genetic engineering

Nesterova has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed papers, with notable publications including:

  • Time-resolved structured illumination microscopy reveals key principles of Xist RNA spreading, 2021, Science
  • The role of the Xist 5' m6A region and RBM15 in X chromosome inactivation, 2020, Wellcome Open Research
  • Xist-mediated silencing requires additive functions of SPEN and Polycomb together with differentiation-dependent recruitment of SmcHD1, 2022, Cell Reports
  • Time-resolved structured illumination microscopy reveals key principles of Xist RNA spreading, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Xist Repeats B and C, but not Repeat A, mediate de novo recruitment of the Polycomb system in X chromosome inactivation, 2021, Developmental Cell

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Nesterova include:

  • Neil Brockdorff
  • Guifeng Wei
  • Heather Coker
  • Joseph S. Bowness
  • Lisa Rodermund

Nesterova's research has been published in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Science
  • Wellcome Open Research
  • Cell Reports
  • EMBO Reports

Best Publications

  • Polycomb Group Proteins Ring1A/B Link Ubiquitylation of Histone H2A to Heritable Gene Silencing and X Inactivation

    Mariana de Napoles;Jacqueline E. Mermoud;Rika Wakao;Y.Amy Tang

  • Cohesins Functionally Associate with CTCF on Mammalian Chromosome Arms

    Vania Parelho;Suzana Hadjur;Mikhail Spivakov;Marion Leleu

  • Establishment of Histone H3 Methylation on the Inactive X Chromosome Requires Transient Recruitment of Eed-Enx1 Polycomb Group Complexes

    Jose Silva;Winifred Mak;Ilona Zvetkova;Ruth Appanah

  • T cell lineage choice and differentiation in the absence of the RNase III enzyme Dicer.

    Bradley S Cobb;Tatyana Nesterova;Elizabeth A. Thompson;Arnulf Hertweck

  • Reactivation of the Paternal X Chromosome in Early Mouse Embryos

    Winifred Mak;Tatyana B. Nesterova;Mariana de Napoles;Ruth Appanah

  • Stabilization of Xist RNA Mediates Initiation of X Chromosome Inactivation

    Steven A Sheardown;Sarah M Duthie;Colette M Johnston;Alistair E.T Newall

  • hnRNPK Recruits PCGF3/5-PRC1 to the Xist RNA B-Repeat to Establish Polycomb-Mediated Chromosomal Silencing.

    Greta Pintacuda;Guifeng Wei;Chloë Roustan;Burcu Anil Kirmizitas

  • A Pooled shRNA Screen Identifies Rbm15, Spen, and Wtap as Factors Required for Xist RNA-Mediated Silencing

    Benoit Moindrot;Andrea Cerase;Heather Coker;Osamu Masui

  • PCGF3/5–PRC1 initiates Polycomb recruitment in X chromosome inactivation

    Mafalda Almeida;Greta Pintacuda;Osamu Masui;Yoko Koseki

  • Characterization of the Genomic Xist Locus in Rodents Reveals Conservation of Overall Gene Structure and Tandem Repeats but Rapid Evolution of Unique Sequence

    Tatyana B. Nesterova;Sergey Ya. Slobodyanyuk;Eugene A. Elisaphenko;Alexander I. Shevchenko

  • Jarid2 binds mono-ubiquitylated H2A lysine 119 to mediate crosstalk between Polycomb complexes PRC1 and PRC2.

    Sarah Cooper;Anne Grijzenhout;Elizabeth Underwood;Katia Ancelin

  • Impairment of DNA Methylation Maintenance Is the Main Cause of Global Demethylation in Naive Embryonic Stem Cells

    Ferdinand von Meyenn;Mario Iurlaro;Ehsan Habibi;Ning Qing Liu

  • Xist RNA exhibits a banded localization on the inactive X chromosome and is excluded from autosomal material in cis.

    Sarah M. Duthie;Tatyana B. Nesterova;Tatyana B. Nesterova;Emma J. Formstone;Ann M. Keohane

  • A Dual Origin of the Xist Gene from a Protein-Coding Gene and a Set of Transposable Elements

    Eugeny A. Elisaphenko;Nikolay N. Kolesnikov;Alexander I. Shevchenko;Igor B. Rogozin;Igor B. Rogozin

  • Tenth International Workshop on Human Gene Mapping

    J.D. Tucker;M.L. Christensen;Av. Carrano;H.P. Wang

  • The nuclear matrix protein CIZ1 facilitates localization of Xist RNA to the inactive X-chromosome territory.

    Rebeca Ridings-Figueroa;Emma R. Stewart;Tatyana B. Nesterova;Heather Coker

  • Epigenetic functions of smchd1 repress gene clusters on the inactive x chromosome and on autosomes

    Anne Valerie Gendrel;Anne Valerie Gendrel;Y. Amy Tang;Y. Amy Tang;Masako Suzuki;Jonathan Godwin

  • Early loss of Xist RNA expression and inactive X chromosome associated chromatin modification in developing primordial germ cells.

    Mariana de Napoles;Tatyana Nesterova;Neil Brockdorff

  • Systematic allelic analysis defines the interplay of key pathways in X chromosome inactivation.

    Tatyana B. Nesterova;Guifeng Wei;Heather Coker;Greta Pintacuda;Greta Pintacuda

  • Spatial separation of Xist RNA and polycomb proteins revealed by superresolution microscopy

    Andrea Cerase;Daniel Smeets;Y. Amy Tang;Michal Gdula

Frequent Co-Authors

Neil Brockdorff
Neil Brockdorff University of Oxford
Igor B. Rogozin
Igor B. Rogozin National Institutes of Health
Matthias Merkenschlager
Matthias Merkenschlager Imperial College London
Lothar Schermelleh
Lothar Schermelleh University of Oxford
Amanda G. Fisher
Amanda G. Fisher University of Oxford
Edith Heard
Edith Heard Collège de France
Wolf Reik
Wolf Reik Babraham Institute
Arie P. Otte
Arie P. Otte University of Amsterdam
Matthew J.A. Wood
Matthew J.A. Wood University of Oxford
John L. VandeBerg
John L. VandeBerg The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about Molecular Biology, a range of related online degrees and career advances are available in the USA. Choosing a program that fits your needs and budget is crucial. Those who already hold a nursing qualification may consider the cheapest bsn to msn online programs to expand their biomedical knowledge and clinical skills while controlling costs.

When selecting a university, many students prefer the stability and mission-driven environment offered by non profit online universities. These institutions often provide strong academic support and well-recognized degrees. If you are a member of the armed forces or a veteran, there are also best online colleges for military that deliver flexible, accessible programs and dedicated support resources.

Students interested in the intersection of science and working with people might explore specialized healthcare pathways, such as social work. Accredited lcsw online programs can lead to careers addressing public health, counseling, and patient advocacy—all sectors that benefit from a strong background in biological sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Tatyana B. Nesterova

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles