World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tatyana B. Nesterova

Tatyana B. Nesterova

D-Index & Metrics

Molecular Biology

D-Index
41
Citations
10108
World Ranking
3047
National Ranking
236

Tatyana B. Nesterova publication distribution in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Molecular Biology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tatyana B. Nesterova sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–66 publications: 17 scientists 67–76 publications: 65 scientists 77–86 publications: 90 scientists 87–96 publications: 125 scientists 97–106 publications: 131 scientists 107–116 publications: 162 scientists 117–126 publications: 177 scientists 127–136 publications: 158 scientists 137–146 publications: 158 scientists 147–156 publications: 146 scientists 157–166 publications: 159 scientists 167–176 publications: 131 scientists 177–186 publications: 110 scientists 187–196 publications: 112 scientists 197–206 publications: 100 scientists 207–216 publications: 89 scientists 217–226 publications: 98 scientists 227–236 publications: 74 scientists 237–246 publications: 72 scientists 247–256 publications: 63 scientists 257–266 publications: 53 scientists 267–276 publications: 54 scientists 277–286 publications: 49 scientists 287–296 publications: 52 scientists 297–306 publications: 43 scientists 307–316 publications: 46 scientists 317–326 publications: 41 scientists 327–336 publications: 42 scientists 337–346 publications: 31 scientists 347–356 publications: 28 scientists 357–366 publications: 29 scientists 367–376 publications: 26 scientists 377–386 publications: 24 scientists 387–396 publications: 24 scientists 397–406 publications: 14 scientists 407–416 publications: 13 scientists 417–426 publications: 20 scientists 427–436 publications: 12 scientists 437–446 publications: 20 scientists 447–456 publications: 11 scientists 457–466 publications: 10 scientists 467–476 publications: 14 scientists 477–486 publications: 14 scientists 487–496 publications: 10 scientists 497–506 publications: 13 scientists 507–516 publications: 13 scientists 517–526 publications: 2 scientists 527–536 publications: 4 scientists 537–546 publications: 6 scientists 547–556 publications: 8 scientists 557–563 publications: 6 scientists 564+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 564+

This scientist: 114 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 564 publications or more.

Tatyana B. Nesterova D-index placement in Molecular Biology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Molecular Biology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tatyana B. Nesterova sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 36 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 101 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 115 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 121 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 130 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 106 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 116 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 113 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 129 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 120 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 105 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 131 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 97 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 106 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 83 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 89 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 77 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 70 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 73 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 60 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 48 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 45 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 50 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 31 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 51 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 43 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 39 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 41 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 29 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 33 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 35 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 20 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 38 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 19 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 28 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 13 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 23 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 15 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 11 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 21 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 14 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 9 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 16 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 7 scientists 144 D-Index: 7 scientists 145+ D-Index: 100 scientists
40 D-Index 145+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 145 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tatyana B. Nesterova is affiliated with the University of Oxford in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily focuses on the fields of Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a total of 35 publications. Within these, their work is especially concentrated in molecular biology, genetics, cancer research, ecology, and plant science.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • RNA modifications and cancer
  • RNA research and splicing
  • RNA and protein synthesis mechanisms
  • Genetic and clinical aspects of sex determination and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Genomics and chromatin dynamics
  • Cancer-related molecular mechanisms research
  • CRISPR and genetic engineering

Nesterova has contributed to multiple peer-reviewed papers, with notable publications including:

  • Time-resolved structured illumination microscopy reveals key principles of Xist RNA spreading, 2021, Science
  • The role of the Xist 5' m6A region and RBM15 in X chromosome inactivation, 2020, Wellcome Open Research
  • Xist-mediated silencing requires additive functions of SPEN and Polycomb together with differentiation-dependent recruitment of SmcHD1, 2022, Cell Reports
  • Time-resolved structured illumination microscopy reveals key principles of Xist RNA spreading, 2020, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Xist Repeats B and C, but not Repeat A, mediate de novo recruitment of the Polycomb system in X chromosome inactivation, 2021, Developmental Cell

The frequent co-authors collaborating with Nesterova include:

  • Neil Brockdorff
  • Guifeng Wei
  • Heather Coker
  • Joseph S. Bowness
  • Lisa Rodermund

Nesterova's research has been published in venues such as:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Science
  • Wellcome Open Research
  • Cell Reports
  • EMBO Reports

Best Publications

  • Polycomb Group Proteins Ring1A/B Link Ubiquitylation of Histone H2A to Heritable Gene Silencing and X Inactivation

    Mariana de Napoles;Jacqueline E. Mermoud;Rika Wakao;Y.Amy Tang

  • Cohesins Functionally Associate with CTCF on Mammalian Chromosome Arms

    Vania Parelho;Suzana Hadjur;Mikhail Spivakov;Marion Leleu

  • Establishment of Histone H3 Methylation on the Inactive X Chromosome Requires Transient Recruitment of Eed-Enx1 Polycomb Group Complexes

    Jose Silva;Winifred Mak;Ilona Zvetkova;Ruth Appanah

  • T cell lineage choice and differentiation in the absence of the RNase III enzyme Dicer.

    Bradley S Cobb;Tatyana Nesterova;Elizabeth A. Thompson;Arnulf Hertweck

  • Reactivation of the Paternal X Chromosome in Early Mouse Embryos

    Winifred Mak;Tatyana B. Nesterova;Mariana de Napoles;Ruth Appanah

  • Stabilization of Xist RNA Mediates Initiation of X Chromosome Inactivation

    Steven A Sheardown;Sarah M Duthie;Colette M Johnston;Alistair E.T Newall

  • hnRNPK Recruits PCGF3/5-PRC1 to the Xist RNA B-Repeat to Establish Polycomb-Mediated Chromosomal Silencing.

    Greta Pintacuda;Guifeng Wei;Chloë Roustan;Burcu Anil Kirmizitas

  • A Pooled shRNA Screen Identifies Rbm15, Spen, and Wtap as Factors Required for Xist RNA-Mediated Silencing

    Benoit Moindrot;Andrea Cerase;Heather Coker;Osamu Masui

  • PCGF3/5–PRC1 initiates Polycomb recruitment in X chromosome inactivation

    Mafalda Almeida;Greta Pintacuda;Osamu Masui;Yoko Koseki

  • Characterization of the Genomic Xist Locus in Rodents Reveals Conservation of Overall Gene Structure and Tandem Repeats but Rapid Evolution of Unique Sequence

    Tatyana B. Nesterova;Sergey Ya. Slobodyanyuk;Eugene A. Elisaphenko;Alexander I. Shevchenko

  • Jarid2 binds mono-ubiquitylated H2A lysine 119 to mediate crosstalk between Polycomb complexes PRC1 and PRC2.

    Sarah Cooper;Anne Grijzenhout;Elizabeth Underwood;Katia Ancelin

  • Impairment of DNA Methylation Maintenance Is the Main Cause of Global Demethylation in Naive Embryonic Stem Cells

    Ferdinand von Meyenn;Mario Iurlaro;Ehsan Habibi;Ning Qing Liu

  • Xist RNA exhibits a banded localization on the inactive X chromosome and is excluded from autosomal material in cis.

    Sarah M. Duthie;Tatyana B. Nesterova;Tatyana B. Nesterova;Emma J. Formstone;Ann M. Keohane

  • A Dual Origin of the Xist Gene from a Protein-Coding Gene and a Set of Transposable Elements

    Eugeny A. Elisaphenko;Nikolay N. Kolesnikov;Alexander I. Shevchenko;Igor B. Rogozin;Igor B. Rogozin

  • Tenth International Workshop on Human Gene Mapping

    J.D. Tucker;M.L. Christensen;Av. Carrano;H.P. Wang

  • The nuclear matrix protein CIZ1 facilitates localization of Xist RNA to the inactive X-chromosome territory.

    Rebeca Ridings-Figueroa;Emma R. Stewart;Tatyana B. Nesterova;Heather Coker

  • Epigenetic functions of smchd1 repress gene clusters on the inactive x chromosome and on autosomes

    Anne Valerie Gendrel;Anne Valerie Gendrel;Y. Amy Tang;Y. Amy Tang;Masako Suzuki;Jonathan Godwin

  • Early loss of Xist RNA expression and inactive X chromosome associated chromatin modification in developing primordial germ cells.

    Mariana de Napoles;Tatyana Nesterova;Neil Brockdorff

  • Systematic allelic analysis defines the interplay of key pathways in X chromosome inactivation.

    Tatyana B. Nesterova;Guifeng Wei;Heather Coker;Greta Pintacuda;Greta Pintacuda

  • Spatial separation of Xist RNA and polycomb proteins revealed by superresolution microscopy

    Andrea Cerase;Daniel Smeets;Y. Amy Tang;Michal Gdula

Frequent Co-Authors

Neil Brockdorff
Neil Brockdorff University of Oxford
Igor B. Rogozin
Igor B. Rogozin National Institutes of Health
Matthias Merkenschlager
Matthias Merkenschlager Imperial College London
Lothar Schermelleh
Lothar Schermelleh University of Oxford
Amanda G. Fisher
Amanda G. Fisher University of Oxford
Edith Heard
Edith Heard Collège de France
Wolf Reik
Wolf Reik Babraham Institute
Arie P. Otte
Arie P. Otte University of Amsterdam
Matthew J.A. Wood
Matthew J.A. Wood University of Oxford
John L. VandeBerg
John L. VandeBerg The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students passionate about Molecular Biology, a range of related online degrees and career advances are available in the USA. Choosing a program that fits your needs and budget is crucial. Those who already hold a nursing qualification may consider the cheapest bsn to msn online programs to expand their biomedical knowledge and clinical skills while controlling costs.

When selecting a university, many students prefer the stability and mission-driven environment offered by non profit online universities. These institutions often provide strong academic support and well-recognized degrees. If you are a member of the armed forces or a veteran, there are also best online colleges for military that deliver flexible, accessible programs and dedicated support resources.

Students interested in the intersection of science and working with people might explore specialized healthcare pathways, such as social work. Accredited lcsw online programs can lead to careers addressing public health, counseling, and patient advocacy—all sectors that benefit from a strong background in biological sciences.

Best Scientists Citing Tatyana B. Nesterova

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles