World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 86 14100 13276 7153 6620 384 28077

Lyn M. Steffen publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lyn M. Steffen between 1992 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lyn M. Steffen published across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026, averaging 12.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 37 publications in 2013. 17 of the 423 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1992 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 37. Peak 37 publications in 2013. 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 8 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 15 publications 2009: 21 publications 2010: 11 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 27 publications 2013: 37 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 21 publications 2016: 22 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 20 publications 2019: 32 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 23 publications 2024: 18 publications 2025: 16 publications 2026: 1 publication
1992 2026

423 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lyn M. Steffen: publications per year, 1992 to 2026
Year Publications
1992 1
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 1
2003 8
2004 4
2005 4
2006 14
2007 11
2008 15
2009 21
2010 11
2011 13
2012 27
2013 37
2014 25
2015 21
2016 22
2017 28
2018 20
2019 32
2020 23
2021 16
2022 11
2023 23
2024 18
2025 16
2026 1
Total 423
Download as CSV

Lyn M. Steffen publications per year - data summary

  • Lyn M. Steffen, a Medicine scholar from University of Minnesota, has 423 publications recorded across 35 years, from 1992 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1992 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2013, with 37 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1992, 2002 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • 9 of the 35 years in the span carry no publications at all (1993, 1994, 1995, 1996 and others).
  • The rate of publication averages 12.1 papers per year over the whole span, or 16.3 per year counting only the 26 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 69 publications, 16% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1992-2003: 10 publications (0.8 per year); 2004-2015: 203 publications (16.9 per year); 2016-2026: 210 publications (19.1 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Lyn M. Steffen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lyn M. Steffen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 381–400 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 384 publications — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861 384
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Lyn M. Steffen publication distribution in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 86 ranges running from 101–120 to 1,796+ publications.
  • Lyn M. Steffen, a Medicine scholar from University of Minnesota, records 384 publications - the 35th percentile of the discipline.
  • 35% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Lyn M. Steffen, and about 65% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 441–460 publications range, and Lyn M. Steffen ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 341–360 publications, holding 922 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 64% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 521–540 publications), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Lyn M. Steffen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lyn M. Steffen sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 86–87 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 86 D-Index — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960 86
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Lyn M. Steffen D-index placement in Medicine in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 20,134 Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 75 ranges running from 70–71 to 217+ D-Index.
  • Lyn M. Steffen, a Medicine scholar from University of Minnesota, records 86 D-Index - the 31st percentile of the discipline.
  • 31% of ranked Medicine scientists score the same or lower than Lyn M. Steffen, and about 69% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 94–95 D-Index range, and Lyn M. Steffen ranks below the median.
  • The most crowded range is 82–83 D-Index, holding 1,027 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 70% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 106–107 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more, 98 scientists in all (<1% of the field).

Overview

Lyn M. Steffen is affiliated with the University of Minnesota in the United States and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, with a primary focus on public health, environmental and occupational health, physiology, nutrition and dietetics, molecular biology, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their research interests span several interconnected topics, including nutritional studies and diet, diet and metabolism studies, fatty acid research and health, metabolomics and mass spectrometry studies, obesity, physical activity and diet, agriculture sustainability and environmental impact, and consumer attitudes and food labeling.

Steffen's recent publications highlight a detailed focus on fatty acids, metabolism, and health outcomes. Notable papers include:

  • Blood n-3 fatty acid levels and total and cause-specific mortality from 17 prospective studies, 2021, Nature Communications
  • n-3 Fatty Acid Biomarkers and Incident Type 2 Diabetes: An Individual Participant-Level Pooling Project of 20 Prospective Cohort Studies, 2021, Diabetes Care
  • Light Cigarette Smoking Increases Risk of All-Cause and Cause-Specific Mortality: Findings from the NHIS Cohort Study, 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Association of omega 3 polyunsaturated fatty acids with incident chronic kidney disease: pooled analysis of 19 cohorts, 2023, BMJ
  • Dietary metabolic signatures and cardiometabolic risk, 2022, European Heart Journal

The scientist has collaborated frequently with experts such as David R. Jacobs, Casey M. Rebholz, James M. Shikany, So-Yun Yi, and Xia Zhou.

Steffen's work is often published in venues that reflect the intersection of nutrition, medicine, and cardiovascular health. Predominant publication venues include UNC Libraries, Current Developments in Nutrition, Circulation, Journal of Nutrition, and Nutrition Metabolism and Cardiovascular Diseases.

Best Publications

  • Dietary Sugars Intake and Cardiovascular Health A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Rachel K. Johnson;Lawrence J. Appel;Michael Brands;Barbara V. Howard

  • Dietary Intake and the Development of the Metabolic Syndrome The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study

    Pamela L. Lutsey;Lyn M. Steffen;June Stevens

  • Nutrients, foods, and dietary patterns as exposures in research: a framework for food synergy

    David R Jacobs;Lyn M Steffen

  • The Effects of Nonpharmacologic Interventions on Blood Pressure of Persons With High Normal Levels: Results of the Trials of Hypertension Prevention, Phase I

    Paul K. Whelton;Lawrence Appel;Jeanne Charleston;Arlene Taylor Dalcin

  • Associations of whole-grain, refined-grain, and fruit and vegetable consumption with risks of all-cause mortality and incident coronary artery disease and ischemic stroke: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study

    Lyn M. Steffen;David R Jacobs;David R Jacobs;June Stevens;Eyal Shahar

  • Dietary carbohydrate intake and mortality: a prospective cohort study and meta-analysis.

    Sara B Seidelmann;Brian Claggett;Susan Cheng;Mir Henglin

  • Dietary Linoleic Acid and Risk of Coronary Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Cohort Studies

    Maryam Farvid;Ming Ding;An Pan;Qi Sun

  • Fruit and Vegetable Consumption and Its Relation to Markers of Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Adolescents

    Erica M. Holt;Lyn M. Steffen;Antoinette Moran;Samar Basu

  • Dietary patterns are associated with biochemical markers of inflammation and endothelial activation in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

    Jennifer A Nettleton;Lyn M Steffen;Elizabeth J Mayer-Davis;Nancy S Jenny

  • Associations of plant food, dairy product, and meat intakes with 15-y incidence of elevated blood pressure in young black and white adults: the Coronary Artery Risk Development in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study

    Lyn M Steffen;Candyce H Kroenke;Xinhua Yu;Mark A Pereira

  • Genetic loci associated with plasma phospholipid n-3 fatty acids: a meta-analysis of genome-wide association studies from the CHARGE Consortium.

    Rozenn N. Lemaitre;Toshiko Tanaka;Weihong Tang;Ani Manichaikul

  • ω-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acid Biomarkers and Coronary Heart Disease: Pooling Project of 19 Cohort Studies

    Liana C. Del Gobbo;Fumiaki Imamura;Stella Aslibekyan;Matti Marklund

  • Nonnutritive Sweeteners: Current Use and Health Perspectives A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association

    Christopher Gardner;Judith Wylie-Rosett;Samuel S. Gidding;Lyn M. Steffen

  • Plant‐Based Diets Are Associated With a Lower Risk of Incident Cardiovascular Disease, Cardiovascular Disease Mortality, and All‐Cause Mortality in a General Population of Middle‐Aged Adults

    Hyunju Kim;Laura E. Caulfield;Vanessa Garcia-Larsen;Lyn M. Steffen

  • Changes in Insulin Resistance and Cardiovascular Risk During Adolescence: Establishment of Differential Risk in Males and Females

    Antoinette Moran;David R. Jacobs;Julia Steinberger;Lyn M. Steffen

  • Food omega-3 fatty acid intake of individuals (total, linolenic acid, long-chain) and their blood pressure: INTERMAP study

    Hirotsugu Ueshima;Jeremiah Stamler;Paul Elliott;Queenie Chan

  • Whole Grain Intake Is Associated with Lower Body Mass and Greater Insulin Sensitivity among Adolescents

    Lyn M Steffen;David R Jacobs;Maureen A. Murtaugh;Antoinette Moran

  • Whole grain intake and its cross-sectional association with obesity, insulin resistance, inflammation, diabetes and subclinical CVD: The MESA Study.

    Pamela L. Lutsey;David R. Jacobs;Sujata Kori;Elizabeth Jane Mayer-Davis

  • Dietary Patterns and Risk of Incident Type 2 Diabetes in the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA)

    Jennifer A. Nettleton;Lyn M. Steffen;Hanyu Ni;Kiang Liu

  • Associations of plant food, dairy product, and meat intakes with 15-y incidence of elevated blood pressure in young black and white adults

    Lyn M Steffen;Candyce H. Kroenke;Xinhua Yu;Mark A Pereira

Frequent Co-Authors

David R. Jacobs
David R. Jacobs University of Minnesota
Michael Y. Tsai
Michael Y. Tsai University of Minnesota
Rozenn N. Lemaitre
Rozenn N. Lemaitre University of Washington
Linda Van Horn
Linda Van Horn Northwestern University
Russell V. Luepker
Russell V. Luepker University of Minnesota
Bruce M. Psaty
Bruce M. Psaty University of Washington
Julia Steinberger
Julia Steinberger University of Minnesota
Aaron R. Folsom
Aaron R. Folsom University of Minnesota
Josef Coresh
Josef Coresh New York University
Dariush Mozaffarian
Dariush Mozaffarian Tufts University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The journey to a medical career in the USA is increasingly flexible, thanks to diverse online degree options. For those aiming for advanced nursing practice, online dnp programs without dissertation make it possible to achieve a terminal degree with a more streamlined path, eliminating the need for extensive research projects.

Entry-level healthcare roles also benefit from online education. Fast, accredited lpn programs offer a direct route into nursing, enabling students to begin working in the field while pursuing further education.

Specializations like mental health care are in high demand. psych nurse practitioner programs allow registered nurses to quickly upskill and serve in crucial mental health settings—all through flexible online study.

Not all students pursue clinical roles; allied fields like healthcare management are equally vital. The bachelors in health administration online is a cost-effective option for those who want to lead hospitals, clinics, and other health organizations without direct patient care.

Best Scientists Citing Lyn M. Steffen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles