World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 51 2493 2272 1215 1092 115 23803

Daniel J. Bauer publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Daniel J. Bauer between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Daniel J. Bauer published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 5 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2022. 19 of the 155 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2022. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 7 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 4 publications 2013: 4 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 2 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 7 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 12 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 9 publications 2025: 10 publications
1995 2025

155 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Daniel J. Bauer: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 2
2002 1
2003 4
2004 7
2005 7
2006 6
2007 7
2008 6
2009 7
2010 6
2011 7
2012 4
2013 4
2014 6
2015 2
2016 3
2017 6
2018 3
2019 8
2020 7
2021 10
2022 12
2023 10
2024 9
2025 10
Total 155
Download as CSV

Daniel J. Bauer publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Bauer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 114–123 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 115 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474 115
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Daniel J. Bauer D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel J. Bauer sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 68th percentile

68% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166 51
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Daniel J. Bauer is affiliated with the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines with a focus that intersects statistics, psychology, economics, and health professions.

Bauer has published extensively, contributing to a range of scientific venues. Among the frequent publication outlets are UNC Libraries, arXiv (Cornell University), Psychological Methods, Journal of Risk & Insurance, and SSRN Electronic Journal.

The main areas of study in Bauer's work include Statistics and Probability, Economics and Econometrics, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Artificial Intelligence, and General Health Professions. Their research topics cover a variety of important domains such as Mental Health Research Topics, Insurance and Financial Risk Management, Insurance, Mortality, Demography, Risk Management, Psychometric Methodologies and Testing, Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis, Global Health Care Issues, and Advanced Statistical Modeling Techniques.

Bauer has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Patrick J. Curran
  • Andrea M. Hussong
  • Nisha C. Gottfredson
  • Christopher J. Urban
  • Siyuan Marco Chen

Recent publications by Bauer include the following papers:

  • Improving the assessment of measurement invariance: Using regularization to select anchor items and identify differential item functioning, 2020, Psychological Methods
  • Psychometric models for scoring multiple reporter assessments: Applications to integrative data analysis in prevention science and beyond, 2020, International Journal of Behavioral Development
  • Chirality sensing of terpenes, steroids, amino acids, peptides and drugs with acyclic cucurbit[n]urils and molecular tweezers, 2020, Chemical Communications
  • A Deep Learning Algorithm for High-Dimensional Exploratory Item Factor Analysis, 2021, Psychometrika
  • Reducing Incidence of Nonpositive Definite Covariance Matrices in Mixed Effect Models, 2020, Multivariate Behavioral Research

Best Publications

  • Computational Tools for Probing Interactions in Multiple Linear Regression, Multilevel Modeling, and Latent Curve Analysis.

    Kristopher J. Preacher;Patrick J. Curran;Daniel J. Bauer

  • The disaggregation of within-person and between-person effects in longitudinal models of change.

    Patrick J. Curran;Daniel J. Bauer

  • Conceptualizing and testing random indirect effects and moderated mediation in multilevel models: new procedures and recommendations.

    Daniel J. Bauer;Kristopher J. Preacher;Karen M. Gil

  • Probing Interactions in Fixed and Multilevel Regression: Inferential and Graphical Techniques

    Daniel J. Bauer;Patrick J. Curran

  • Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes.

    Daniel J. Bauer;Patrick J. Curran

  • Local solutions in the estimation of growth mixture models.

    John R. Hipp;Daniel J. Bauer

  • The integration of continuous and discrete latent variable models: potential problems and promising opportunities.

    Daniel J. Bauer;Patrick J. Curran

  • Sexual and drug behavior patterns and HIV and STD racial disparities: the need for new directions.

    Denise Dion Hallfors;Bonita J. Iritani;William C. Miller;Daniel J. Bauer

  • Which Comes First in Adolescence—Sex and Drugs or Depression?

    Denise D. Hallfors;Martha W. Waller;Daniel J Bauer;Carol A. Ford

  • Observations on the Use of Growth Mixture Models in Psychological Research

    Daniel J. Bauer

  • Estimating Multilevel Linear Models as Structural Equation Models

    Daniel J. Bauer

  • A Note on the Relation Between Factor Analytic and Item Response Theory Models

    Akihito Kamata;Daniel J. Bauer

  • A More General Model for Testing Measurement Invariance and Differential Item Functioning.

    Daniel J. Bauer

  • Psychometric Approaches for Developing Commensurate Measures Across Independent Studies: Traditional and New Models

    Daniel J. Bauer;Andrea M. Hussong

  • Power and Precision in Confirmatory Factor Analytic Tests of Measurement Invariance

    Adam W. Meade;Daniel J. Bauer

  • Crimes of Opportunity or Crimes of Emotion? Testing Two Explanations of Seasonal Change in Crime

    John R. Hipp;Daniel John Bauer;Patrick Curran;Kenneth A. Bollen

  • Matching method with theory in person-oriented developmental psychopathology research.

    Sonya K. Sterba;Daniel J. Bauer

  • Overextraction of latent trajectory classes: Much ado about nothing? Reply to Rindskopf (2003), Muthén (2003), and Cudeck and Henly (2003)

    Daniel J. Bauer;Patrick J. Curran

  • Integrative Data Analysis in Clinical Psychology Research

    Andrea M. Hussong;Patrick J. Curran;Daniel J. Bauer

  • Simple Intercepts, Simple Slopes, and Regions of Significance in MLR 2-Way Interactions

    Kristopher J. Preacher;Patrick J. Curran;Daniel J. Bauer

  • "Psychometric approaches for developing commensurate measures across independent studies: Traditional and new models": Clarification to Bauer and Hussong (2009).

    Daniel J. Bauer;Andrea M. Hussong

Frequent Co-Authors

Patrick J. Curran
Patrick J. Curran University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Andrea M. Hussong
Andrea M. Hussong University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Denise Dion Hallfors
Denise Dion Hallfors Pacific Institute For Research and Evaluation
Vangie A. Foshee
Vangie A. Foshee University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Susan T. Ennett
Susan T. Ennett University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Laurie Chassin
Laurie Chassin Arizona State University
Robert A. Zucker
Robert A. Zucker University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Michael J. Shanahan
Michael J. Shanahan University of Zurich
John R. Hipp
John R. Hipp University of California, Irvine
Scott A. Baldwin
Scott A. Baldwin Brigham Young University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens the door to many meaningful career options. Popular pathways include careers in psychology, social work, marriage and family therapy, and clinical practice. Today, more students are choosing to earn their degrees online, allowing for flexible learning and wider access to accredited programs.

A psychology degree online is a versatile option, leading to roles in counseling, research, or community outreach. For those interested in helping others on a systemic level, a masters in social work prepares graduates for direct practice or policy roles across various organizations. If you want to specialize in mental health or clinical work, check out the best online psyd programs to become a licensed psychologist. Or, for a focus on relational and family systems, consider exploring lmft programs.

Whether you’re seeking an affordable, accessible path or advancing your credentials, online degrees in social sciences and humanities offer practical solutions for career growth and meaningful impact.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel J. Bauer

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles