World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
44
Citations
12933
World Ranking
4959
National Ranking
1701

John Alcock publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Alcock sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 200 publications — 74th percentile

74% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

John Alcock D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John Alcock sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

John Alcock is affiliated with Arizona State University in the United States. Their academic profile reflects a research career connected to this institution.

There is no information available on recent papers published by John Alcock, including titles, publication venues, or citation counts. Similarly, specific co-authors frequently collaborating with Alcock have not been listed.

No data is available regarding frequent publication venues for Alcock's work. Details about any book publications or publishers associated with their work are also absent.

The main fields and subfields of study, as well as the central topics covered by Alcock's research, have not been provided.

There is no record of any awards or honors received by John Alcock.

The scientist is currently living, and no information indicates otherwise.

Best Publications

  • The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems

    Randy Thornhill;John Alcock

  • Animal Behavior: An Evolutionary Approach

    John Alcock

  • Inclusive fitness theory and eusociality

    Patrick Abbot;Jun Abe;John Alcock;Samuel Alizon

  • Postinsemination Associations Between Males and Females in Insects: The Mate-Guarding Hypothesis

    John Alcock

  • The Triumph of Sociobiology

    John Alcock

  • The ecology and evolution of male reproductive behaviour in the bees and wasps

    John Alcock;Edward M. Barrows;Gordon Gordh;L. Jan Hubbard

  • Animal behavior: An evolutionary approach, 4th ed.

    John Alcock

  • Male Mating Strategies in the Bee Centris pallida Fox (Anthophoridae: Hymenoptera)

    John Alcock;C. Eugene Jones;Stephen L. Buchmann

  • THE EVOLUTION OF THE USE OF TOOLS BY FEEDING ANIMALS.

    John Alcock

  • Leks and hilltopping in insects

    John Alcock

  • The reproductive behavior of Anthidium maculosum (Hymenoptera: Megachilidae) and the evolutionary significance of multiple copulations by females

    John Alcock;George C. Eickwort;Kathleen R. Eickwort

  • THE EVOLUTION OF INTRASPECIFIC DIVERSITY IN MALE REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGIES IN SOME BEES AND WASPS

    John Alcock

  • Natural Selection and the Mating Systems of Solitary Bees

    John Alcock

  • Female mimicry and resource defense polygyny by males of a tropical rove beetle, Leistotrophus versicolor (Coleoptera : Staphylinidae)

    Adrian Forsyth;John Alcock

  • Location before emergence of the female bee, Centris pallida, by its male (Hymenoptera: Anthophoridae)

    John Alcock;C. Eugene Jones;Stephen L. Buchmann

  • The role of cuticular hydrocarbons in male attraction and repulsion by female Dawson's burrowing bee, Amegilla dawsoni

    Leigh W. Simmons;John Alcock;Anthony Reeder

  • Success in territorial defence by male tarantula hawk wasps Hemipepsis ustulata: the role of residency

    John Alcock;Winston Bailey

  • Lek territoriality in the tarantula hawk wasp Hemipepsis ustulata (Hymenoptera: Pompilidae)

    John Alcock

  • The relation between male body size, fighting, and mating success in Dawson's burrowing bee, Amegilla dawsoni (Apidae, Apinae, Anthophorini)

    John Alcock

  • The Utility of the Proximate-Ultimate Dichotomy in Ethology

    John Alcock;Paul Sherman

  • Punishment levels and the response of black-capped chickadees (Parus atricapillus) to three kinds of artificial seeds

    John Alcock

  • Male size and survival: the effects of male combat and bird predation in Dawson's burrowing bees, Amegilla dawsoni

    John Alcock

  • Competition from large males and the alternative mating tactics of small males of dawson’s burrowing bee (Amegilla dawsoni) (apidae, apinae, anthophorini)

    John Alcock

  • Territorial behaviour by males of Philanthus multimaculatus (Hymenoptera: Sphecidae) with a review of territoriality in male sphecids

    John Alcock

  • Book Review: The Evolution of Insect Mating Systems

    Randy Thornhill;John Alcock

Frequent Co-Authors

Randy Thornhill
Randy Thornhill University of New Mexico
Leigh W. Simmons
Leigh W. Simmons University of Western Australia
Darrell J. Kemp
Darrell J. Kemp Macquarie University
Stephen L. Buchmann
Stephen L. Buchmann University of Arizona
Ronald L. Rutowski
Ronald L. Rutowski Arizona State University
Paul W. Sherman
Paul W. Sherman Cornell University
Darryl T. Gwynne
Darryl T. Gwynne University of Toronto
Joseph L. Tomkins
Joseph L. Tomkins University of Western Australia
Lincoln P. Brower
Lincoln P. Brower Sweet Briar College
Jerry A. Coyne
Jerry A. Coyne University of Chicago

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens up diverse career opportunities, especially when complemented by an understanding of healthcare pathways. Many students are interested in programs that bridge science, healthcare, and research, offering flexible learning through online degrees.

For those aiming for accelerated education in healthcare, the 6-month rn to bsn program offers a fast-track route for registered nurses to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing. This can be beneficial for students who want to blend ecological research with community health initiatives.

Students from an RN background interested in advanced roles should consider rn to np programs, which pave the way to becoming nurse practitioners. These programs can be particularly useful for those seeking to integrate evolutionary theory with practical healthcare delivery.

For non-nurses with a passion for interdisciplinary science, online direct entry msn programs for non-nurses provide a unique opportunity to enter the field of nursing and healthcare leadership.

When comparing top online learning institutions, understanding the differences between programs such as the chamberlain vs capella rn to bsn program helps students select the best fit for their career goals in ecology, evolution, and health sciences.

Best Scientists Citing John Alcock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles