World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
William M. Perlstein

William M. Perlstein

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 38 8725 8148 4643 4227 77 9820
Neuroscience 38 8443 7801 3601 3260 84 9822

William M. Perlstein publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by William M. Perlstein between 1986 and 2023, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. William M. Perlstein published across 38 years, from 1986 to 2023, averaging 2.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2007. 3 of the 85 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1986 to 2023. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2007. 1986: 1 publication 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 6 publications 2007: 7 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 5 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 5 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 3 publications 2017: 1 publication 2018: 2 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 3 publications 2021: 1 publication 2022: 1 publication 2023: 2 publications
1986 2023

85 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
William M. Perlstein: publications per year, 1986 to 2023
Year Publications
1986 1
1987 2
1988 0
1989 1
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 0
1996 2
1997 2
1998 6
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 2
2003 3
2004 1
2005 1
2006 6
2007 7
2008 5
2009 7
2010 2
2011 5
2012 1
2013 5
2014 3
2015 3
2016 3
2017 1
2018 2
2019 1
2020 3
2021 1
2022 1
2023 2
Total 85
Download as CSV

William M. Perlstein publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William M. Perlstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 78–87 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 84 publications — 9th percentile

9% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406 84
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

William M. Perlstein D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where William M. Perlstein sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38–39 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459 38
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

William M. Perlstein is affiliated with the University of Florida in the United States. Their research primarily centers on the field of Medicine, with a particular emphasis on Epidemiology, Pharmacology, Orthopedics and Sports Medicine, Surgery, and Neurology.

The scientist's work spans several main topics, including:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Sports injuries and prevention
  • Shoulder Injury and Treatment
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Trauma and Emergency Care Studies

William M. Perlstein has contributed to a variety of research articles. Notable recent publications include:

  • Negative health consequences of pain catastrophizing among retired National Football League athletes, 2020, Health Psychology
  • Executive function improvement in response to meta-cognitive training in chronic mTBI / PTSD, 2023, Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
  • 4216 A TL1 team approach to investigate attention and learning at the intracranial network level and assess the effect different cognitive rehabilitation strategies have on measures of attention and learning, 2020, Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
  • Enhancing Goal Management Training with Attention Drill Training, 2022, Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • 70925 A TL1 team approach to investigate attention and learning at the intracranial network level and assess the effect different cognitive rehabilitation strategies have on measures of attention and learning, 2021, Journal of Clinical and Translational Science

Frequent collaborators include:

  • Catherine Tocci
  • J. Kay Waid-Ebbs
  • Pey-Shan Wen
  • Giridhar P. Kalamangalam
  • Ayse Gunduz

The venues where William M. Perlstein has published most often are:

  • Journal of Clinical and Translational Science
  • Health Psychology
  • Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences
  • Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
  • Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society

Best Publications

  • Temporal dynamics of brain activation during a working memory task

    Jonathan D. Cohen;Jonathan D. Cohen;William M. Perlstein;Todd S. Braver;Leigh E. Nystrom

  • Relation of prefrontal cortex dysfunction to working memory and symptoms in schizophrenia.

    William M. Perlstein;Cameron S. Carter;Douglas C. Noll;Jonathan D. Cohen

  • Individualized Piano Instruction enhances executive functioning and working memory in older adults

    J. A. Bugos;W. M. Perlstein;C. S. McCrae;T. S. Brophy

  • Functional hypofrontality and working memory dysfunction in schizophrenia

    Cameron S. Carter;William Perlstein;Rohan Ganguli;Jaspreet Brar

  • Prefrontal cortex dysfunction mediates deficits in working memory and prepotent responding in schizophrenia.

    William M Perlstein;Neha K Dixit;Cameron S Carter;Douglas C Noll

  • Dissociation in human prefrontal cortex of affective influences on working memory-related activity

    William M. Perlstein;Thomas Elbert;V. Andrew Stenger

  • Placebo analgesia is accompanied by large reductions in pain-related brain activity in irritable bowel syndrome patients.

    Donald D. Price;Jason Craggs;G. Nicholas Verne;William M. Perlstein

  • Brain activity related to temporal summation of C-fiber evoked pain.

    Roland Staud;Jason G. Craggs;Michael E. Robinson;William M. Perlstein

  • Neural time course of conflict adaptation effects on the Stroop task.

    Michael J. Larson;David A.S. Kaufman;William M. Perlstein

  • Age-related changes in word retrieval: role of bilateral frontal and subcortical networks.

    Christina E. Wierenga;Christina E. Wierenga;Christina E. Wierenga;Michelle Benjamin;Michelle Benjamin;Kaundinya Gopinath;Kaundinya Gopinath;William M. Perlstein;William M. Perlstein

  • The Stroop Task and Attention Deficits in Schizophrenia: A Critical Evaluation of Card and Single-Trial Stroop Methodologies

    William M. Perlstein;Cameron S. Carter;M Deanna;James W. Baird

  • Parametric manipulation of working memory load in traumatic brain injury: behavioral and neural correlates.

    William M. Perlstein;Michael A. Cole;Jason A. Demery;Paul J. Seignourel

  • Brain Activity Associated with Slow Temporal Summation of C-fiber Evoked Pain in Fibromyalgia Patients and Healthy Controls

    Roland Staud;Jason G. Craggs;William M. Perlstein;Michael E. Robinson

  • Gray matter volumes of pain-related brain areas are decreased in fibromyalgia syndrome.

    Michael E. Robinson;Jason G. Craggs;Donald D. Price;William M. Perlstein

  • Functional brain interactions that serve cognitive-affective processing during pain and placebo analgesia.

    Jason G. Craggs;Donald D. Price;G. Nicholas Verne;William M. Perlstein

  • The Stroop task and attention deficits in schizophrenia: A critical evaluation of card and single-trial Stroop methodologies.

    Unknown

  • Widespread hyperalgesia in irritable bowel syndrome is dynamically maintained by tonic visceral impulse input and placebo/nocebo factors: evidence from human psychophysics, animal models, and neuroimaging.

    Donald D. Price;Jason G. Craggs;QiQi Zhou;G. Nicholas Verne

  • Temporal dissociation of components of cognitive control dysfunction in severe TBI: ERPs and the cued-Stroop task.

    William M. Perlstein;Michael J. Larson;Vonetta M. Dotson;Kiesa G. Kelly

  • Immediate changes after manual therapy in resting-state functional connectivity as measured by functional magnetic resonance imaging in participants with induced low back pain.

    Michael E. Robinson;Steven Z. George;William M. Perlstein;William M. Perlstein

  • Steady-state visual evoked potentials reveal frontally-mediated working memory activity in humans

    William M. Perlstein;Michael A. Cole;Michael Larson;Kiesa Kelly

  • Increased Stroop facilitation effects in schizophrenia are not due to increased automatic spreading activation

    M Deanna;Cameron S. Carter;William Perlstein;James Baird

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael E. Robinson
Michael E. Robinson University of Florida
Michael J. Larson
Michael J. Larson Brigham Young University
Donald D. Price
Donald D. Price University of Florida
Jonathan D. Cohen
Jonathan D. Cohen Princeton University
Roland Staud
Roland Staud University of Florida
Cameron S. Carter
Cameron S. Carter University of California, Irvine
Christina S. McCrae
Christina S. McCrae University of Missouri
Bruce Crosson
Bruce Crosson Emory University
Douglas C. Noll
Douglas C. Noll University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Christina E. Wierenga
Christina E. Wierenga University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in Neuroscience can open doors to a variety of related careers in mental health, counseling, and social services. Many students choose to complement their studies with specialized degrees that offer flexibility and accelerated paths. For those interested in entering the social work field quickly, a fast track social work degree online can provide advanced training in a shorter time frame.

Psychology is another popular pathway for neuroscience students. Programs like accelerated psychology programs online are designed to help students gain essential knowledge and skills more rapidly, making them ideal for those eager to launch their careers.

Counseling is a natural fit for neuroscience graduates, especially with the growing demand for qualified professionals. If affordability is a priority, consider the cheapest cacrep-accredited programs online or the cheapest online lpc programs. These options allow students to pursue licensure and establish themselves in the field without taking on excessive debt.

With flexible online degrees and various accelerated options, there are numerous pathways to leverage your neuroscience background for a rewarding career.

Best Scientists Citing William M. Perlstein

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles