World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Ecology and Evolution 63 1905 1823 155 151 190 56077

Rod Peakall publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rod Peakall between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rod Peakall published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 5.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2017. 5 of the 198 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2017. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 0 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 2 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 4 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 3 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 2 publications 2005: 9 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 4 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 3 publications
1987 2025

198 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rod Peakall: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 0
1989 4
1990 2
1991 1
1992 0
1993 4
1994 0
1995 2
1996 1
1997 1
1998 3
1999 3
2000 6
2001 0
2002 4
2003 7
2004 2
2005 9
2006 7
2007 5
2008 5
2009 11
2010 7
2011 2
2012 12
2013 12
2014 13
2015 8
2016 6
2017 15
2018 9
2019 5
2020 9
2021 5
2022 8
2023 4
2024 2
2025 3
Total 198
Download as CSV

Rod Peakall publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rod Peakall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 37–41 to 531+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 333. Most scientists, 333, have 97–101 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 187–191 publications, is where this scientist sits. 37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37–41 publications 531+

This scientist: 190 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
37–41 2
42–46 9
47–51 10
52–56 31
57–61 56
62–66 91
67–71 92
72–76 127
77–81 173
82–86 236
87–91 227
92–96 240
97–101 333
102–106 280
107–111 300
112–116 285
117–121 305
122–126 287
127–131 278
132–136 289
137–141 273
142–146 262
147–151 246
152–156 235
157–161 205
162–166 199
167–171 174
172–176 164
177–181 173
182–186 189
187–191 170 190
192–196 139
197–201 128
202–206 117
207–211 115
212–216 107
217–221 124
222–226 81
227–231 82
232–236 85
237–241 75
242–246 66
247–251 81
252–256 69
257–261 70
262–266 55
267–271 64
272–276 49
277–281 48
282–286 44
287–291 45
292–296 36
297–301 39
302–306 38
307–311 30
312–316 34
317–321 25
322–326 22
327–331 28
332–336 30
337–341 22
342–346 30
347–351 26
352–356 22
357–361 29
362–366 21
367–371 12
372–376 18
377–381 17
382–386 13
387–391 21
392–396 13
397–401 10
402–406 15
407–411 8
412–416 9
417–421 8
422–426 4
427–431 10
432–436 10
437–441 5
442–446 4
447–451 10
452–456 2
457–461 4
462–466 7
467–471 7
472–476 6
477–481 6
482–486 3
487–491 3
492–496 4
497–501 4
502–506 8
507–511 5
512–516 4
517–521 5
522–526 4
527–530 5
531+ 100
Download as CSV

Rod Peakall D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rod Peakall sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 92 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 121+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 280. Most scientists, 280, have 40 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 63 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 63 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Ecology and Evolution scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 8,381 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 95
31 123
32 191
33 245
34 252
35 244
36 249
37 244
38 254
39 254
40 280
41 274
42 266
43 233
44 248
45 208
46 201
47 213
48 207
49 172
50 209
51 199
52 153
53 169
54 163
55 148
56 120
57 146
58 137
59 140
60 104
61 119
62 118
63 99 63
64 77
65 100
66 86
67 83
68 75
69 94
70 57
71 68
72 59
73 63
74 66
75 60
76 42
77 49
78 39
79 37
80 43
81 41
82 45
83 34
84 40
85 35
86 55
87 24
88 24
89 30
90 23
91 25
92 27
93 27
94 13
95 23
96 12
97 14
98 19
99 16
100 14
101 5
102 21
103 16
104 10
105 7
106 7
107 7
108 6
109 9
110 11
111 12
112 9
113 7
114 3
115 8
116 5
117 11
118 4
119 2
120 5
121+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Rod Peakall is affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology. Within these broad areas, their subfields of study include Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics, Molecular Biology, Nature and Landscape Conservation, Plant Science, and Genetics.

Peakall's work covers a range of main topics in plant and animal studies, including Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies, Plant biochemistry and biosynthesis, Plant Parasitism and Resistance, Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions, Plant Gene Expression Analysis, and Insect and Arachnid Ecology and Behavior.

They have contributed articles to several frequent publication venues. The most common are Current Biology, where they have published five papers; Frontiers in Plant Science with three publications; Annals of Botany and Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society, each with two; and Trends in Plant Science with one publication.

Peakall has collaborated often with several researchers. Frequent coauthors include Ryan D. Phillips, Darren C. J. Wong, Björn Bohman, James Perkins, and Noushka Reiter.

Their recent scientific papers include the following:

  • Niche Perspectives on Plant-Pollinator Interactions, 2020, Trends in Plant Science
  • Orchid conservation: from theory to practice, 2020, Annals of Botany
  • Unburnt habitat patches are critical for survival and in situ population recovery in a small mammal after fire, 2021, Journal of Applied Ecology
  • The volatile chemistry of orchid pollination, 2023, Natural Product Reports
  • An unusual tricosatriene is crucial for male fungus gnat attraction and exploitation by sexually deceptive Pterostylis orchids, 2021, Current Biology

Best Publications

  • genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research

    Rodney Peakall;Peter E Smouse

  • GenAlEx 6.5

    Rod Peakall;Peter E. Smouse

  • Spatial autocorrelation analysis of individual multiallele and multilocus genetic structure.

    Peter E. Smouse;Rod Peakall

  • RAPD variation within and among natural populations of outcrossing buffalograss [Buchloë dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm.]

    David Robert Huff;R. Peakall;R. Peakall;P. E. Smouse

  • SPATIAL AUTOCORRELATION ANALYSIS OFFERS NEW INSIGHTS INTO GENE FLOW IN THE AUSTRALIAN BUSH RAT, RATTUS FUSCIPES

    Rodney Peakall;Monica Ruibal;David B Lindenmayer

  • The Chemistry of Sexual Deception in an Orchid-Wasp Pollination System

    Florian P. Schiestl;Rod Peakall;Jim G. Mant;Fernando Ibarra

  • Pollinator-driven ecological speciation in plants: new evidence and future perspectives

    Timotheus Van der Niet;Timotheus Van der Niet;Timotheus Van der Niet;Rodney Peakall;Steven D. Johnson

  • Chloroplast simple sequence repeats (cpSSRs): technical resources and recommendations for expanding cpSSR discovery and applications to a wide array of plant species

    Unknown

  • How does ecological disturbance influence genetic diversity

    Sam C. Banks;Geoffrey J. Cary;Annabel L. Smith;Ian D. Davies

  • Evaluation of the contribution of genetic research to the management of the endangered plant Zieria prostrata

    Patricia M. Hogbin;Rod Peakall

  • DISPERSAL, PHILOPATRY, AND INFIDELITY: DISSECTING LOCAL GENETIC STRUCTURE IN SUPERB FAIRY-WRENS (MALURUS CYANEUS)

    Michael Double;Rodney Peakall;Nadeena Beck;Andrew Cockburn

  • ECOLOGICAL AND GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF POLLINATION BY SEXUAL DECEPTION IN THE ORCHID CALADENIA TENTACTULATA.

    Rod Peakall;Rod Peakall;Andrew J. Beattie

  • Comparative analysis of genetic diversity in the mangrove species Avicennia marina (Forsk.) Vierh. (Avicenniaceae) detected by AFLPs and SSRs

    Unknown

  • Pollinator specificity, floral odour chemistry and the phylogeny of Australian sexually deceptive Chiloglottis orchids: implications for pollinator-driven speciation

    Rod Peakall;Daniel Ebert;Jacqueline Poldy;Russell A. Barrow

  • A heterogeneity test for fine-scale genetic structure.

    Peter E Smouse;Rodney Peakall;Eva Gonzales

  • Responses of male Zaspilothynnus trilobatus turner wasps to females and the sexually deceptive orchid it pollinates.

    Rod Peakall

  • Genetic spatial autocorrelation can readily detect sex‐biased dispersal

    Samuel Banks;Rodney Peakall

  • DOES SELECTION ON FLORAL ODOR PROMOTE DIFFERENTIATION AMONG POPULATIONS AND SPECIES OF THE SEXUALLY DECEPTIVE ORCHID GENUS OPHRYS

    Jim Mant;Rodney Peakall;Florian Schiestl

  • Comparative genetic study confirms exceptionally low genetic variation in the ancient and endangered relictual conifer, Wollemia nobilis (Araucariaceae).

    Rod Peakall;Daniel Ebert;Leon J. Scott;Patricia F. Meagher

  • Extensive clonality in the endangered shrub Haloragodendron lucasii (Haloragaceae) revealed by allozymes and RAPDs

    Marita A. Sydes;Rod Peakall

  • Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) reveals introgression in weedy Onopordum thistles: hybridization and invasion

    P. C. O'Hanlon;Rod Peakall;D. T. Briese

  • Inference of higher-order conifer relationships from a multi-locus plastid data set

    Hardeep S. RaiH.S. Rai;Hardeep S. RaiH.S. Rai;Hardeep S. RaiH.S. Rai;Patrick A. ReevesP.A. Reeves;Patrick A. ReevesP.A. Reeves;Patrick A. ReevesP.A. Reeves;Rod PeakallR. Peakall;Rod PeakallR. Peakall;Rod PeakallR. Peakall;Richard G. OlmsteadR.G. Olmstead;Richard G. OlmsteadR.G. Olmstead;Richard G. OlmsteadR.G. Olmstead

  • THE GENETIC CONSEQUENCES OF WORKER ANT POLLINATION IN A SELF-COMPATIBLE, CLONAL ORCHID.

    Rod Peakall;Andrew J. Beattie

  • A new technique for monitoring pollen flow in orchids.

    Rod Peakall

  • A PHYLOGENETIC STUDY OF POLLINATOR CONSERVATISM AMONG SEXUALLY DECEPTIVE ORCHIDS

    Jim G. Mant;Florian P. Schiestl;Florian P. Schiestl;Rod Peakall;Peter H. Weston

Frequent Co-Authors

Ryan D. Phillips
Ryan D. Phillips La Trobe University
Gavin R. Flematti
Gavin R. Flematti University of Western Australia
Kingsley W. Dixon
Kingsley W. Dixon Curtin University
Sam C. Banks
Sam C. Banks Charles Darwin University
Celeste C. Linde
Celeste C. Linde Australian National University
Eran Pichersky
Eran Pichersky University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Florian P. Schiestl
Florian P. Schiestl University of Zurich
David B. Lindenmayer
David B. Lindenmayer Australian National University
Andrew J. Beattie
Andrew J. Beattie Macquarie University
Robert Heinsohn
Robert Heinsohn Australian National University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution opens doors to varied career pathways, and many professionals now enhance their skills through flexible online programs. Environmental science, policy, conservation, and research careers often benefit from advanced degrees that are increasingly available in digital formats.

When exploring online education options, it's important to find reputable and supportive institutions. For those interested in healthcare-related ecological fields, the top rated online nursing schools wgu comparison can guide learners seeking interdisciplinary skills. Affordability also matters—students can explore the cheapest bsn to msn online programs as they evaluate financial investment against career outcomes.

Academic quality and ethical considerations are crucial when selecting an online degree. Many students prefer institutions recognized as non profit colleges for their mission-driven values. Lastly, veterans and active service members interested in ecological careers can benefit from colleges acknowledged as military friendly online colleges that offer dedicated support and flexible scheduling.

Best Scientists Citing Rod Peakall

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles