World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
31
Citations
3585
World Ranking
7564
National Ranking
541

Erica McWilliam publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erica McWilliam sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 132 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Erica McWilliam D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erica McWilliam sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Erica McWilliam is affiliated with the Queensland University of Technology in Australia, where their research focuses on areas within the social sciences. Their work primarily spans the subfields of library and information sciences as well as education.

Their main topics of study include diverse education studies and reforms, library science and administration, and library science and information literacy, reflecting a combination of interests in educational systems and the organization and dissemination of information.

Erica McWilliam has published in the IASL Annual Conference Proceedings, contributing at least one paper titled High standards or a high standard of standardness? This paper was published in 2021.

Publication venues associated with their research are as follows:

  • IASL Annual Conference Proceedings

Frequent topics covered by Erica McWilliam's work include:

  • Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
  • Library Science and Administration
  • Library Science and Information Literacy

Fields of study connected to their research activities include:

  • Social Sciences

Subfields of their research activity identify:

  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Education

Best Publications

  • Teaching for creativity: Towards sustainable and replicable pedagogical practice

    Erica McWilliam;Shane Dawson

  • Teaching for creativity: from sage to guide to meddler

    Erica McWilliam

  • Unlearning how to teach

    Erica McWilliam

  • Teaching smarter: how mining ICT data can inform and improve learning and teaching practice

    Shane P Dawson;Erica McWilliam;Jen Pei-Ling Tan

  • Against Professional Development

    Erica L. McWilliam

  • Research Training in Doctoral Programs - What can be learned from Professional Doctorates?

    Erica McWilliam;Peter Taylor;Pat Thomson;Bill Green

  • Educating the creative workforce: new directions for twenty‐first century schooling

    Erica McWilliam;Sandra Haukka

  • Changing the academic subject

    Erica Mcwilliam

  • Touchy Subjects: a risky inquiry into pedagogical pleasure

    Erica McWilliam

  • Transdisciplinarity for creative futures: what barriers and opportunities?

    Erica McWilliam;Greg Hearn;Brad Haseman

  • Measuring creative potential: Using social network analysis to monitor a learners' creative capacity

    Shane Dawson;Jennifer Pei Ling Tan;Erica McWilliam

  • Re-designing science pedagogy: reversing the flight from science

    Erica McWilliam;Philip Poronnik;Peter G. Taylor

  • Getting tense about genealogy

    Daphne Meadmore;Caroline Hatcher;Erica Mcwilliam

  • The Creative Workforce: How to Launch Young People into High-Flying Futures

    Erica McWilliam

  • What game are we in? Living with academic development

    Alison Lee;Erica McWilliam

  • From Literacy to Multiliteracies: Diverse Learners and Pedagogical Practice

    Jennifer Pei-Ling Tan;Erica McWilliam

  • An unprotected species? On teachers as risky subjects

    Erica L. McWilliam;Alison Jones

  • W(h)ither Practitioner Research

    Erica L. McWilliam

  • Against professional development

    Unknown

  • Doctoral Education, Danger and Risk Management

    Erica McWilliam;Parlo Singh;Peter G. Taylor

  • One-to-one pedagogy: developing a protocol for illuminating the nature of teaching in the conservatoire

    Gemma Carey;Catherine Fiona Grant;Erica McWilliam;Peter Gordon Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Shane Dawson
Shane Dawson University of South Australia
Gemma Carey
Gemma Carey University of New South Wales
Alexander Seeshing Yeung
Alexander Seeshing Yeung Australian Catholic University
Pat Thomson
Pat Thomson University of Nottingham
Susan Danby
Susan Danby Queensland University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to diverse online degree options and career pathways in the USA. Many students pursue accelerated programs for flexibility and quicker entry into the workforce. One popular choice is an msw accelerated programs, which prepares graduates for advanced social work roles in various settings.

For those interested in understanding human behavior, an accelerated online bachelor's degree in psychology offers foundational knowledge and prepares you for graduate studies or roles in counseling, education, or human services.

If you are considering a career in professional counseling, choosing a program with cacrep accreditation ensures quality standards and can be essential for licensure and employment opportunities.

Those interested in supporting relationships and families may opt for an mft degree, which leads to roles in marriage and family therapy with a focus on holistic wellness.

By considering these related degrees and accreditation pathways, you can align your studies with your career aspirations in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Erica McWilliam

Trending Scientists