World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 31 7564 7029 541 521 132 3585

Erica McWilliam publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Erica McWilliam between 1987 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Erica McWilliam published across 35 years, from 1987 to 2021, averaging 3.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 22 publications in 2008. 1 of the 133 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 22. Peak 22 publications in 2008. 1987: 1 publication 1988: 1 publication 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 3 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 6 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 4 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 9 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 22 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 0 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 1 publication 2016: 2 publications 2017: 4 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 1 publication
1987 2021

133 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Erica McWilliam: publications per year, 1987 to 2021
Year Publications
1987 1
1988 1
1989 1
1990 0
1991 1
1992 1
1993 3
1994 0
1995 5
1996 6
1997 2
1998 4
1999 3
2000 7
2001 6
2002 9
2003 4
2004 8
2005 8
2006 6
2007 6
2008 22
2009 5
2010 4
2011 2
2012 0
2013 7
2014 3
2015 1
2016 2
2017 4
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 1
Total 133
Download as CSV

Erica McWilliam publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erica McWilliam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 124–133 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 132 publications — 32nd percentile

32% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453 132
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Erica McWilliam D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Erica McWilliam sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 31 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210 31
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Erica McWilliam is affiliated with the Queensland University of Technology in Australia, where their research focuses on areas within the social sciences. Their work primarily spans the subfields of library and information sciences as well as education.

Their main topics of study include diverse education studies and reforms, library science and administration, and library science and information literacy, reflecting a combination of interests in educational systems and the organization and dissemination of information.

Erica McWilliam has published in the IASL Annual Conference Proceedings, contributing at least one paper titled High standards or a high standard of standardness? This paper was published in 2021.

Publication venues associated with their research are as follows:

  • IASL Annual Conference Proceedings

Frequent topics covered by Erica McWilliam's work include:

  • Diverse Education Studies and Reforms
  • Library Science and Administration
  • Library Science and Information Literacy

Fields of study connected to their research activities include:

  • Social Sciences

Subfields of their research activity identify:

  • Library and Information Sciences
  • Education

Best Publications

  • Teaching for creativity: Towards sustainable and replicable pedagogical practice

    Erica McWilliam;Shane Dawson

  • Teaching for creativity: from sage to guide to meddler

    Erica McWilliam

  • Unlearning how to teach

    Erica McWilliam

  • Teaching smarter: how mining ICT data can inform and improve learning and teaching practice

    Shane P Dawson;Erica McWilliam;Jen Pei-Ling Tan

  • Against Professional Development

    Erica L. McWilliam

  • Research Training in Doctoral Programs - What can be learned from Professional Doctorates?

    Erica McWilliam;Peter Taylor;Pat Thomson;Bill Green

  • Educating the creative workforce: new directions for twenty‐first century schooling

    Erica McWilliam;Sandra Haukka

  • Changing the academic subject

    Erica Mcwilliam

  • Touchy Subjects: a risky inquiry into pedagogical pleasure

    Erica McWilliam

  • Transdisciplinarity for creative futures: what barriers and opportunities?

    Erica McWilliam;Greg Hearn;Brad Haseman

  • Measuring creative potential: Using social network analysis to monitor a learners' creative capacity

    Shane Dawson;Jennifer Pei Ling Tan;Erica McWilliam

  • Re-designing science pedagogy: reversing the flight from science

    Erica McWilliam;Philip Poronnik;Peter G. Taylor

  • Getting tense about genealogy

    Daphne Meadmore;Caroline Hatcher;Erica Mcwilliam

  • The Creative Workforce: How to Launch Young People into High-Flying Futures

    Erica McWilliam

  • What game are we in? Living with academic development

    Alison Lee;Erica McWilliam

  • From Literacy to Multiliteracies: Diverse Learners and Pedagogical Practice

    Jennifer Pei-Ling Tan;Erica McWilliam

  • An unprotected species? On teachers as risky subjects

    Erica L. McWilliam;Alison Jones

  • W(h)ither Practitioner Research

    Erica L. McWilliam

  • Against professional development

    Unknown

  • Doctoral Education, Danger and Risk Management

    Erica McWilliam;Parlo Singh;Peter G. Taylor

  • One-to-one pedagogy: developing a protocol for illuminating the nature of teaching in the conservatoire

    Gemma Carey;Catherine Fiona Grant;Erica McWilliam;Peter Gordon Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Shane Dawson
Shane Dawson University of South Australia
Gemma Carey
Gemma Carey University of New South Wales
Alexander Seeshing Yeung
Alexander Seeshing Yeung Australian Catholic University
Pat Thomson
Pat Thomson University of Nottingham
Susan Danby
Susan Danby Queensland University of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities opens doors to diverse online degree options and career pathways in the USA. Many students pursue accelerated programs for flexibility and quicker entry into the workforce. One popular choice is an msw accelerated programs, which prepares graduates for advanced social work roles in various settings.

For those interested in understanding human behavior, an accelerated online bachelor's degree in psychology offers foundational knowledge and prepares you for graduate studies or roles in counseling, education, or human services.

If you are considering a career in professional counseling, choosing a program with cacrep accreditation ensures quality standards and can be essential for licensure and employment opportunities.

Those interested in supporting relationships and families may opt for an mft degree, which leads to roles in marriage and family therapy with a focus on holistic wellness.

By considering these related degrees and accreditation pathways, you can align your studies with your career aspirations in the social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Erica McWilliam

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles