World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
6738
World Ranking
8516
National Ranking
3627

Patrick J. Drew publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick J. Drew sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 66 publications — 3rd percentile

3% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Patrick J. Drew D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick J. Drew sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Patrick J. Drew is affiliated with Pennsylvania State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Neuroscience and Medicine, with specific focus on subfields such as Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Neurology, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, and Biomedical Engineering.

The researcher's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Cerebrospinal fluid and hydrocephalus
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Neuroscience of respiration and sleep

Patrick J. Drew has contributed frequently to a range of scientific journals and repositories. Their most common publication venues include:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • eLife
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Trends in Neurosciences
  • Nature Communications

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Patrick J. Drew are:

  • Ultra-slow Oscillations in fMRI and Resting-State Connectivity: Neuronal and Vascular Contributions and Technical Confounds, 2020, Neuron
  • Neurovascular coupling: motive unknown, 2022, Trends in Neurosciences
  • Arterial pulsations drive oscillatory flow of CSF but not directional pumping, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Neurovascular coupling and bilateral connectivity during NREM and REM sleep, 2020, eLife
  • nNOS-expressing interneurons control basal and behaviorally evoked arterial dilation in somatosensory cortex of mice, 2020, eLife

Collaboration is a notable aspect of Drew's scientific output. The most frequent co-authors include:

  • Kevin L. Turner
  • Qingguang Zhang
  • Kyle W. Gheres
  • Md Shakhawat Hossain
  • Ravi Teja Kedarasetti

Best Publications

  • Correlations of neuronal and microvascular densities in murine cortex revealed by direct counting and colocalization of nuclei and vessels.

    Philbert S. Tsai;John P. Kaufhold;Pablo Blinder;Beth Friedman

  • Cascade models of synaptically stored memories.

    Stefano Fusi;Patrick J. Drew;L.F. Abbott

  • Two-Photon Microscopy as a Tool to Study Blood Flow and Neurovascular Coupling in the Rodent Brain

    Andy Y Shih;Jonathan D Driscoll;Patrick J Drew;Nozomi Nishimura

  • Chronic optical access through a polished and reinforced thinned skull

    Patrick James Drew;Andy Y. Shih;Jonathan D. Driscoll;Per Magne Knutsen

  • Fluctuating and sensory-induced vasodynamics in rodent cortex extend arteriole capacity

    Patrick J. Drew;Andy Y. Shih;David Kleinfeld

  • Texture Coding in the Rat Whisker System: Slip-Stick Versus Differential Resonance

    Jason Wolfe;Dan N Hill;Sohrab Pahlavan;Patrick J Drew

  • Time to wake up: Studying neurovascular coupling and brain-wide circuit function in the un-anesthetized animal.

    Yu Rong Gao;Yuncong Ma;Qingguang Zhang;Aaron T. Winder

  • Weak correlations between hemodynamic signals and ongoing neural activity during the resting state.

    Aaron T. Winder;Christina Echagarruga;Qingguang Zhang;Patrick J. Drew

  • Models and Properties of Power-Law Adaptation in Neural Systems

    Patrick James Drew;L. F. Abbott

  • Rapid determination of particle velocity from space-time images using the Radon transform

    Patrick J. Drew;Pablo Blinder;Gert Cauwenberghs;Andy Y. Shih

  • Ultra-slow Oscillations in fMRI and Resting-State Connectivity: Neuronal and Vascular Contributions and Technical Confounds

    Patrick J. Drew;Celine Mateo;Kevin L. Turner;Xin Yu

  • A polished and reinforced thinned-skull window for long-term imaging of the mouse brain.

    Andy Y. Shih;Celine Mateo;Patrick James Drew;Philbert S. Tsai

  • Anatomical basis and physiological role of cerebrospinal fluid transport through the murine cribriform plate.

    Jordan N Norwood;Qingguang Zhang;David Card;Amanda Craine

  • Extending the effects of spike-timing-dependent plasticity to behavioral timescales.

    Patrick J. Drew;L. F. Abbott

  • Arterial pulsations drive oscillatory flow of CSF but not directional pumping.

    Ravi Teja Kedarasetti;Patrick J. Drew;Francesco Costanzo

  • Cerebral oxygenation during locomotion is modulated by respiration.

    Qingguang Zhang;Morgane Roche;Kyle W. Gheres;Emmanuelle Chaigneau;Emmanuelle Chaigneau

  • Vascular and neural basis of the BOLD signal.

    Patrick J Drew

  • Neurovascular coupling and bilateral connectivity during NREM and REM sleep

    Kevin L Turner;Kyle W Gheres;Elizabeth A Proctor;Patrick J Drew

  • Robust and Fragile Aspects of Cortical Blood Flow in Relation to the Underlying Angioarchitecture

    Andy Y. Shih;Charlotta Rühlmann;Pablo Blinder;Anna Devor

  • Neurovascular Coupling and Decoupling in the Cortex during Voluntary Locomotion

    Bing Xing Huo;Jared B. Smith;Patrick J. Drew

  • A Guide to Delineate the Logic of Neurovascular Signaling in the Brain

    David Kleinfeld;Pablo Blinder;Patrick J. Drew;Jonathan D. Driscoll

  • Finding coherence in spontaneous oscillations

    Patrick James Drew;Jeff H. Duyn;Eugene Golanov;David Kleinfeld

Frequent Co-Authors

David Kleinfeld
David Kleinfeld University of California, San Diego
Serge Charpak
Serge Charpak Pennsylvania State University
Daniel E. Feldman
Daniel E. Feldman University of California, Berkeley
Patrick D. Lyden
Patrick D. Lyden University of Southern California
Nanyin Zhang
Nanyin Zhang Pennsylvania State University
Gert Cauwenberghs
Gert Cauwenberghs University of California, San Diego
Kevin J. Bender
Kevin J. Bender Oregon Health & Science University
Pablo Celnik
Pablo Celnik Johns Hopkins University
Katsumi Watanabe
Katsumi Watanabe Waseda University
Harvey J. Karten
Harvey J. Karten University of California, San Diego

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Aspiring neuroscience students have more options than ever for flexible study, thanks to a boom in accelerated degree programs. These online pathways allow you to finish your bachelor’s faster, enter the workforce sooner, or quickly pivot into another field.

If salary prospects are a priority, it’s worth noting that neuroscience overlaps with several areas on the list of degrees that pay well. Graduates go on to rewarding careers in biotech, pharmaceuticals, medicine, and research—sectors consistently represented among the highest paid college majors.

Affordability is another key concern. Many students are seeking online colleges that offer financial aid to reduce costs and manage debt. Be sure to research these options so you can pursue your neuroscience ambitions without financial barriers.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick J. Drew

Trending Scientists