World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Chemistry

D-Index
76
Citations
45724
World Ranking
4158
National Ranking
1311

Alexander V. Neimark publication distribution in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Chemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander V. Neimark sits on this spectrum.

61–80 publications: 66 scientists 81–100 publications: 302 scientists 101–120 publications: 623 scientists 121–140 publications: 918 scientists 141–160 publications: 1,218 scientists 161–180 publications: 1,350 scientists 181–200 publications: 1,344 scientists 201–220 publications: 1,281 scientists 221–240 publications: 1,216 scientists 241–260 publications: 1,100 scientists 261–280 publications: 979 scientists 281–300 publications: 939 scientists 301–320 publications: 764 scientists 321–340 publications: 643 scientists 341–360 publications: 628 scientists 361–380 publications: 522 scientists 381–400 publications: 459 scientists 401–420 publications: 397 scientists 421–440 publications: 327 scientists 441–460 publications: 270 scientists 461–480 publications: 265 scientists 481–500 publications: 252 scientists 501–520 publications: 201 scientists 521–540 publications: 185 scientists 541–560 publications: 148 scientists 561–580 publications: 148 scientists 581–600 publications: 132 scientists 601–620 publications: 114 scientists 621–640 publications: 104 scientists 641–660 publications: 91 scientists 661–680 publications: 92 scientists 681–700 publications: 73 scientists 701–720 publications: 57 scientists 721–740 publications: 54 scientists 741–760 publications: 67 scientists 761–780 publications: 45 scientists 781–800 publications: 46 scientists 801–820 publications: 39 scientists 821–840 publications: 32 scientists 841–860 publications: 36 scientists 861–880 publications: 29 scientists 881–900 publications: 26 scientists 901–920 publications: 24 scientists 921–940 publications: 14 scientists 941–960 publications: 23 scientists 961–980 publications: 28 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 15 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 29 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 12 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 19 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 12 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 6 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 8 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 12 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 5 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 6 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 14 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 7 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 2 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 6 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 4 scientists 1,281–1,294 publications: 6 scientists 1,295+ publications: 100 scientists
61 publications 1,295+

This scientist: 290 publications — 61st percentile

61% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,295 publications or more.

Alexander V. Neimark D-index placement in Chemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Chemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Alexander V. Neimark sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 612 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 808 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 776 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 835 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 861 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 872 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 933 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,051 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 930 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 882 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 834 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 731 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 775 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 683 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 646 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 561 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 501 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 437 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 388 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 354 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 292 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 275 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 254 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 235 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 185 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 192 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 155 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 163 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 125 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 105 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 105 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 112 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 88 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 68 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 69 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 65 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 79 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 61 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 44 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 37 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 40 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 33 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 26 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 34 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 35 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 25 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 27 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 17 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 16 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 20 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 20 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 15 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 9 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 16 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 11 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 9 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 3 scientists 158 D-Index: 3 scientists 159+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 159+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 159 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2004 - Fellow of John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation

Overview

Alexander V. Neimark is affiliated with Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey in the United States. Their research spans multiple interconnected fields including Engineering, Materials Science, and Chemistry, with a concentrated focus on Materials Chemistry and Inorganic Chemistry as well as Biomedical Engineering and Mechanics of Materials.

Their work addresses various scientific topics such as:

  • Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • Phase Equilibria and Thermodynamics
  • Hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
  • Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis
  • Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
  • Enhanced Oil Recovery Techniques
  • Catalytic Processes in Materials Science

Alexander V. Neimark has published extensively in specialized scientific journals. Their more recent papers include:

  • "Dissipative particle dynamics simulations in colloid and Interface science: a review," 2021, published in Advances in Colloid and Interface Science
  • "Pore size characterization of micro-mesoporous carbons using CO2 adsorption," 2020, published in Carbon
  • "Pore opening and breathing transitions in metal-organic frameworks: Coupling adsorption and deformation," 2020, published in Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
  • "Modeling Gas-Liquid Interfaces by Dissipative Particle Dynamics: Adsorption and Surface Tension of Cetyl Trimethyl Ammonium Bromide at the Air-Water Interface," 2020, published in Langmuir
  • "Atomic-scale molecular models of oxidized activated carbon fibre nanoregions: Examining the effects of oxygen functionalities on wet formaldehyde adsorption," 2020, published in Carbon

Their frequent publication venues further highlight their scientific focus, including:

  • Carbon
  • Journal of Colloid and Interface Science
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • Langmuir
  • Biophysical Journal

Collaboration plays a significant role in their research activities. Frequent co-authors have been:

  • Kolattukudy P. Santo
  • Nicholas J. Corrente
  • Piotr Kowalczyk
  • Artur P. Terzyk
  • Katsumi Kaneko

Alexander V. Neimark is recognized as a Fellow of the John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, an award received in 2004.

Best Publications

  • Physisorption of gases, with special reference to the evaluation of surface area and pore size distribution (IUPAC Technical Report)

    Matthias Thommes;Katsumi Kaneko;Alexander V. Neimark;James P. Olivier

  • Surface Area and Porosity

    Alexander V. Neimark;Kenneth S. W. Sing;Matthias Thommes

  • Density functional theory methods for characterization of porous materials

    John Landers;Gennady Yu. Gor;Alexander V. Neimark

  • Quenched solid density functional theory and pore size analysis of micro-mesoporous carbons

    Alexander V. Neimark;Yangzheng Lin;Peter I. Ravikovitch;Matthias Thommes

  • Unified Approach to Pore Size Characterization of Microporous Carbonaceous Materials from N2, Ar, and CO2 Adsorption Isotherms†

    Peter I. Ravikovitch;Aleksey Vishnyakov;Ron Russo;Alexander V. Neimark

  • Adsorption hysteresis of nitrogen and argon in pore networks and characterization of novel micro- and mesoporous silicas

    Matthias Thommes;Bernd Smarsly;Matthijs Groenewolt;Peter I. Ravikovitch

  • Characterization of Micro- and Mesoporosity in SBA-15 Materials from Adsorption Data by the NLDFT Method

    Peter I. Ravikovitch;Alexander V. Neimark

  • Density Functional Theory of Adsorption in Spherical Cavities and Pore Size Characterization of Templated Nanoporous Silicas with Cubic and Three-Dimensional Hexagonal Structures

    Peter I. Ravikovitch and;Alexander V. Neimark

  • Capillary Hysteresis in Nanopores: Theoretical and Experimental Studies of Nitrogen Adsorption on MCM-41

    P.I. Ravikovitch;S.C.O. Domhnaill;A.V. Neimark;F. Schüth;F. Schüth

  • Experimental Confirmation of Different Mechanisms of Evaporation from Ink-Bottle Type Pores: Equilibrium, Pore Blocking, and Cavitation

    Peter I. Ravikovitch;Alexander V. Neimark

  • Characterization of nanoporous materials from adsorption and desorption isotherms

    Peter I. Ravikovitch;Alexander V. Neimark

  • Evaluation of Pore Structure Parameters of MCM-41 Catalyst Supports and Catalysts by Means of Nitrogen and Argon Adsorption

    P. I. Ravikovitch;D. Wei;W. T. Chueh;G. L. Haller

  • Quenched solid density functional theory method for characterization of mesoporous carbons by nitrogen adsorption

    Gennady Yu. Gor;Matthias Thommes;Katie A. Cychosz;Alexander V. Neimark

  • Capillary condensation in MMS and pore structure characterization

    Alexander V Neimark;Peter I Ravikovitch

  • Sorption hysteresis of benzene in charcoal particles.

    Washington J. Braida;Joseph J. Pignatello;Yuefeng Lu;Peter I. Ravikovitch

  • Density functional theory model for calculating pore size distributions: pore structure of nanoporous catalysts

    Peter I. Ravikovitch;Gary L. Haller;Alexander V. Neimark;Alexander V. Neimark

  • Nanopore Structure and Sorption Properties of Cu-BTC Metal-Organic Framework

    Aleksey Vishnyakov;Peter I. Ravikovitch;Alexander V. Neimark;Martin Bulow

  • Density functional theory model of adsorption on amorphous and microporous silica materials.

    Peter I. Ravikovitch;Alexander V. Neimark

  • Pore Size Analysis of MCM-41 Type Adsorbents by Means of Nitrogen and Argon Adsorption

    Alexander V. Neimark;Alexander V. Neimark;Peter I. Ravikovitch;Michael Grün;Ferdi Schüth;Ferdi Schüth

  • Characterization of MCM-48 materials

    K. Schumacher;P. I. Ravikovitch;A. Du Chesne;A. V. Neimark

Frequent Co-Authors

Peter I. Ravikovitch
Peter I. Ravikovitch ExxonMobil (United States)
Matthias Thommes
Matthias Thommes University of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Alain H. Fuchs
Alain H. Fuchs Chimie ParisTech
Anne Boutin
Anne Boutin École Normale Supérieure
Katsumi Kaneko
Katsumi Kaneko Shinshu University
Ferdi Schüth
Ferdi Schüth Max Planck Society
Artur P. Terzyk
Artur P. Terzyk Nicolaus Copernicus University
Bert M. Weckhuysen
Bert M. Weckhuysen Utrecht University
Klaus K. Unger
Klaus K. Unger Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Chemistry, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. One such path is a cheapest online forensic science degree, which combines chemical knowledge with criminal investigation techniques.

Additionally, for those drawn to the psychological aspects of crime, pursuing a masters in forensic psychology online offers greater specialization without the need to relocate.

Understanding salary expectations is crucial when choosing a career path. Forensic professionals can learn about average earning potential by researching topics like forensic scientist salary, which reflects the demand and expertise required in the field.

Cost is another important factor in degree selection. Prospective students should consider the expenses outlined in resources such as how much is criminal justice degree to make informed decisions about their educational investments.

Best Scientists Citing Alexander V. Neimark

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles