World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 85 14428 13585 7300 6756 728 34087

Robert H. Rosenwasser publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Robert H. Rosenwasser between 1981 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Robert H. Rosenwasser published across 46 years, from 1981 to 2026, averaging 17.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 81 publications in 2025. 85 of the 796 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1981 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 81. Peak 81 publications in 2025. 1981: 4 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 6 publications 1984: 2 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 2 publications 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 3 publications 1991: 10 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 6 publications 1994: 9 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 28 publications 1999: 11 publications 2000: 12 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 6 publications 2006: 13 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 10 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 28 publications 2012: 50 publications 2013: 65 publications 2014: 54 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 18 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 43 publications 2020: 52 publications 2021: 40 publications 2022: 27 publications 2023: 36 publications 2024: 45 publications 2025: 81 publications 2026: 4 publications
1981 2026

796 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Robert H. Rosenwasser: publications per year, 1981 to 2026
Year Publications
1981 4
1982 0
1983 6
1984 2
1985 0
1986 2
1987 2
1988 0
1989 4
1990 3
1991 10
1992 1
1993 6
1994 9
1995 6
1996 1
1997 1
1998 28
1999 11
2000 12
2001 6
2002 4
2003 4
2004 8
2005 6
2006 13
2007 4
2008 10
2009 17
2010 13
2011 28
2012 50
2013 65
2014 54
2015 25
2016 18
2017 23
2018 12
2019 43
2020 52
2021 40
2022 27
2023 36
2024 45
2025 81
2026 4
Total 796
Download as CSV

Robert H. Rosenwasser publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert H. Rosenwasser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 721–740 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 728 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259 728
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Robert H. Rosenwasser D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert H. Rosenwasser sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 84–85 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 29th percentile

29% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003 85
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Robert H. Rosenwasser is affiliated with Thomas Jefferson University in the United States and has an extensive record of research contributions in medicine, focusing primarily on neurology. Their work spans over 598 publications in the field of medicine, with notable subfields including neurology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, epidemiology, surgery, and cardiology and cardiovascular medicine.

Their research interests cover a variety of topics related to cerebrovascular diseases and neurosurgical procedures. Key areas of focus include intracranial aneurysms: treatment and complications, acute ischemic stroke management, cerebrovascular and carotid artery diseases, vascular malformations diagnosis and treatment, vascular procedures and complications, neurosurgical procedures and complications, and traumatic brain injury and neurovascular disturbances.

Prominent recent papers authored or coauthored by Rosenwasser include:

  • Status of SARS-CoV-2 in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with COVID-19 and stroke, 2020, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
  • Cerebral ischemic and hemorrhagic complications of coronavirus disease 2019, 2020, International Journal of Stroke
  • Endovascular robotic: feasibility and proof of principle for diagnostic cerebral angiography and carotid artery stenting, 2020, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
  • Telemedicine in Neurosurgery: Lessons Learned and Transformation of Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020, World Neurosurgery
  • Letter: Thrombotic Neurovascular Disease in COVID-19 Patients, 2020, Neurosurgery

Frequent collaborators in Rosenwasser's research include:

  • M. Reid Gooch
  • Stavropoula Tjoumakaris
  • Pascal Jabbour
  • Nabeel Herial
  • Joanna M. Roy

Rosenwasser's work has been published extensively in several key neurosurgical and neurological publication venues. The most frequent ones include:

  • Neurosurgery
  • World Neurosurgery
  • Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
  • Operative Neurosurgery
  • Journal of neurosurgery

Best Publications

  • Guidelines for the Early Management of Adults With Ischemic Stroke A Guideline From the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology affirms the value of this guideline as an educational tool for neurologists.

    Harold P. Adams;Gregory del Zoppo;Mark J. Alberts;Deepak L. Bhatt

  • Guidelines for the management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage: A statement for healthcare professionals from a special writing group of the stroke council, American heart association

    Joshua B. Bederson;E. Sander Connolly;Henry H Batjer;Ralph G. Dacey

  • 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease: Executive summary: A report of the American college of cardiology foundation/american heart association task force on practice guidelines, and the American stroke association, American association of neuroscience nurses

    Thomas G. Brott;Jonathan L. Halperin;Suhny Abbara;J. Michael Bacharach

  • 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease: Executive Summary

    Thomas G. Brott;Jonathan L. Halperin;Suhny Abbara;J. Michael Bacharach

  • Recommendations for the Management of Intracranial Arteriovenous Malformations A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From a Special Writing Group of the Stroke Council, American Stroke Association

    Christopher S. Ogilvy;Philip E. Stieg;Issam Awad;Robert D. Brown

  • Recommendations for the Management of Patients With Unruptured Intracranial Aneurysms A Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association

    Bederson Jb;Awad Ia;Wiebers Do;Piepgras D

  • Biology of intracranial aneurysms: role of inflammation

    Nohra Chalouhi;Muhammad S Ali;Pascal M Jabbour;Stavropoula I Tjoumakaris

  • Endovascular occlusion of wide-necked aneurysms with a new intracranial microstent (Neuroform) and detachable coils

    Ronald P Benitez;Marco T Silva;Jack Klem;Erol Veznedaroglu

  • The unruptured intracranial aneurysm treatment score: A multidisciplinary consensus

    Nima Etminan;Robert D. Brown;Kerim Beseoglu;Seppo Juvela

  • 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS Guideline on the Management of Patients With Extracranial Carotid and Vertebral Artery Disease

    Thomas G. Brott;Jonathan L. Halperin;Suhny Abbara;J. Michael Bacharach

  • Stent-Assisted Coiling of Intracranial Aneurysms: Predictors of Complications, Recanalization, and Outcome in 508 Cases

    Nohra Chalouhi;Pascal Jabbour;Saurabh Singhal;Ross Drueding

  • A review of size and location of ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

    Thomas R. Forget;Ronald Benitez;Erol Veznedaroglu;Ashwini Sharan

  • Guidelines for the early management of adults with ischemic stroke: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association Stroke Council, Clinical Cardiology Council, Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention Council, and the Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease and Quality of Care Outcomes in Research Interdisciplinary Working Groups: The American Academy of Neurology

    Harold P. Adams;Gregory del Zoppo;Mark J. Alberts;Deepak L. Bhatt

  • Status of SARS-CoV-2 in cerebrospinal fluid of patients with COVID-19 and stroke.

    Fadi Al Saiegh;Ritam Ghosh;Adam Leibold;Michael B. Avery

  • Therapeutic modalities for the management of cerebral vasospasm: timing of endovascular options.

    Robert H. Rosenwasser;Rocco A. Armonda;Jeffrey E. Thomas;Ronald P. Benitez

  • Complications following cranioplasty: incidence and predictors in 348 cases.

    Mario Zanaty;Nohra Chalouhi;Robert M Starke;Shannon W Clark

  • Comparison of Flow Diversion and Coiling in Large Unruptured Intracranial Saccular Aneurysms

    Nohra Chalouhi;Stavropoula Tjoumakaris;Robert M. Starke;L. Fernando Gonzalez

  • Multimodality treatment of giant intracranial arteriovenous malformations.

    Steven D. Chang;Mary L. Marcellus;Michael P. Marks;Richard P. Levy;Richard P. Levy

  • Recommendations for the management of patients with unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A statement for healthcare professionals from the Stroke Council of the American Heart Association.

    Joshua B. Bederson;Issam A. Awad;David O. Wiebers;David Piepgras

  • 2011 ASA/ACCF/AHA/AANN/AANS/ACR/ASNR/CNS/SAIP/SCAI/SIR/SNIS/SVM/SVS guideline on the management of patients with extracranial carotid and vertebral artery disease.

    Thomas G. Brott;Jonathan L. Halperin;Suhny Abbara;J. Michael Bacharach

Frequent Co-Authors

Aaron S. Dumont
Aaron S. Dumont Tulane University
Robert M. Starke
Robert M. Starke University of Miami
L. Nelson Hopkins
L. Nelson Hopkins University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Randall T. Higashida
Randall T. Higashida University of California, San Francisco
James S. Harrop
James S. Harrop Thomas Jefferson University
Carol L. Shields
Carol L. Shields Thomas Jefferson University
Ashwini Sharan
Ashwini Sharan Thomas Jefferson University
Lorraine Iacovitti
Lorraine Iacovitti Thomas Jefferson University
Suhny Abbara
Suhny Abbara The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Mark A. Creager
Mark A. Creager Dartmouth College

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in Medicine goes beyond the traditional MD path. Many students in the USA are turning to alternative medical and nursing degrees online to accelerate their progress and meet workforce demands. For those with nursing backgrounds, rn to bsn online no clinicals accredited programs allow you to upgrade credentials without on-site clinical requirements, providing flexibility for working professionals.

If you aim to reach the highest levels in nursing, online Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) programs offer several options. Busy nurses may benefit from shortest dnp programs online to quickly earn an advanced degree. Alternatively, those looking for convenience and manageable coursework can explore online dnp programs tailored for different learning styles.

Individuals earlier in their career journey might find a fast lpn program to be a rapid entry point into patient care roles. These diverse online pathways can prepare you for a range of medical careers, offering flexible, accredited routes to meet your goals in the healthcare sector.

Best Scientists Citing Robert H. Rosenwasser

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles