World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mark Hallerberg

Mark Hallerberg

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Economics and Finance 34 3039 2756 105 100 149 7719
Political Science 34 822 743 38 37 155 7741

Mark Hallerberg publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Mark Hallerberg between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Mark Hallerberg published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 5.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 15 publications in 2015. 2 of the 167 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 15. Peak 15 publications in 2015. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 4 publications 1997: 4 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 3 publications 2000: 4 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 3 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 0 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 2 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 13 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 9 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 13 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 10 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 5 publications 2020: 1 publication 2021: 6 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 1 publication
1995 2025

167 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Mark Hallerberg: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 4
1997 4
1998 2
1999 3
2000 4
2001 2
2002 8
2003 3
2004 8
2005 0
2006 6
2007 2
2008 4
2009 13
2010 6
2011 9
2012 7
2013 13
2014 9
2015 15
2016 10
2017 10
2018 8
2019 5
2020 1
2021 6
2022 0
2023 2
2024 1
2025 1
Total 167
Download as CSV

Mark Hallerberg publications per year - data summary

  • Mark Hallerberg, a Political Science scholar from Hertie School, has 167 publications recorded across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1995 and the most recent to 2025.
  • The most productive year is 2015, with 15 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 1995, 2020, 2024 and 2025, with 1 publication each.
  • 2 of the 31 years in the span carry no publications at all (2005 and 2022).
  • The rate of publication averages 5.4 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.8 per year counting only the 29 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2021-2025) hold 10 publications, 6% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1995-2005: 39 publications (3.5 per year); 2006-2016: 94 publications (8.5 per year); 2017-2025: 34 publications (3.8 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is broadly steady.

Mark Hallerberg publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Hallerberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–155 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 155 publications — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45 155
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Mark Hallerberg publication distribution in Political Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 2,033 Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 61 ranges running from 36–40 to 333+ publications.
  • Mark Hallerberg, a Political Science scholar from Hertie School, records 155 publications - the 67th percentile of the discipline.
  • 67% of ranked Political Science scientists score the same or lower than Mark Hallerberg, and about 33% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 121–125 publications range, and Mark Hallerberg ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 333+ publications, holding 97 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 44% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 111–115 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 333 publications or more, 97 scientists in all (5% of the field).

Mark Hallerberg D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark Hallerberg sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 34 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84 34
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Mark Hallerberg D-index placement in Political Science in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 2,033 Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 43 ranges running from 20 to 62+ D-Index.
  • Mark Hallerberg, a Political Science scholar from Hertie School, records 34 D-Index - the 62nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 62% of ranked Political Science scientists score the same or lower than Mark Hallerberg, and about 38% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 32 D-Index range, and Mark Hallerberg ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 62+ D-Index, holding 100 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 45% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 30 D-Index), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more, 100 scientists in all (5% of the field).

Overview

Mark Hallerberg is affiliated with the Hertie School in Germany. Their research primarily concentrates on the intersections of fiscal policies and political economy, with a significant focus on local government finance and decentralization.

The main fields of study encompassing their work include Social Sciences and Economics, Econometrics and Finance. Specific subfields addressed by their research are Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, as well as contributions to Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, and Accounting.

Their research topics cover diverse aspects such as:

  • Fiscal Policies and Political Economy
  • Local Government Finance and Decentralization
  • Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
  • Media Influence and Politics
  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation
  • Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
  • Corporate Taxation and Avoidance

Mark Hallerberg has published articles in several academic venues, including:

  • European Journal of Political Economy
  • JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies
  • Regional & Federal Studies
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex)
  • The Journal of Politics

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Hallerberg include:

  • "Fiscal consolidations and electoral outcomes in emerging economies: Does the policy mix matter? Macro and micro level evidence from Latin America" (2020, European Journal of Political Economy)
  • "Council Checks of the Commission under the European Semester: Does Member State Power and Euroscepticism Still Matter?" (2021, JCMS Journal of Common Market Studies)
  • "The role of fiscal coordination and partisanship in the Spanish fiscal federalist system" (2021, Regional & Federal Studies)
  • "Council Checks of the Commission under the European Semester: Does Member State Power and Euroskepticism Still Matter?" (2021, Open Access at Essex (University of Essex))
  • "Regimes, Leaders, and Lockdowns: Who Responded More Quickly to the COVID-19 Pandemic?" (2025, The Journal of Politics)

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Hallerberg include:

  • Nicole Baerg
  • Martín Ardanaz
  • Carlos Scartascini
  • Diego Alonso Salazar Morales
  • Joachim Wehner

Best Publications

  • Electoral Institutions, Cabinet Negotiations, and Budget Deficits in the European Union

    Mark Hallerberg;Jurgen von Hagen

  • The Design of Fiscal Rules and Forms of Governance in European Union Countries

    Mark Hallerberg;Rolf Strauch;Jürgen von Hagen;Jürgen von Hagen;Jürgen von Hagen

  • Fiscal governance in Europe

    Mark Hallerberg;Rolf Rainer Strauch;Jürgen von Hagen

  • Remodeling the Competition for Capital: How Domestic Politics Erases the Race to the Bottom

    Scott J. Basinger;Mark Hallerberg

  • Internationalization and Changes in Tax Policy in OECD Countries: The Importance of Domestic Veto Players

    Mark Hallerberg;Scott Basinger

  • Mobile Capital, Domestic Institutions, and Electorally Induced Monetary and Fiscal Policy

    William Roberts Clark;Mark Hallerberg

  • Domestic Budgets in a United Europe: Fiscal Governance from the End of Bretton Woods to EMU

    Mark Hallerberg

  • Executive Authority, the Personal Vote, and Budget Discipline in Latin American and Caribbean Countries

    Mark Hallerberg;Patrick Marier

  • Budgetary forecasts in Europe - the track record of stability and convergence programmes

    Rolf Strauch;Mark Hallerberg;Juergen von Hagen

  • Electoral Institutions, Cabinet Negotiations, and Budget Deficits in the European Union

    Mark Hallerberg;Jürgen von Hagen;Jürgen von Hagen

  • Veto Players and the Choice of Monetary Institutions

    Mark Hallerberg

  • Fiscal institutions, fiscal policy and sovereign risk premia in EMU

    Mark Hallerberg;Mark Hallerberg;Guntram B. Wolff

  • Patterns of Parliamentary Behavior: Passage of Legislation Across Western Europe

    Herbert Döring;Mark Hallerberg

  • Political Business Cycles in EU Accession Countries

    Mark Hallerberg;Lúcio Vinhas de Souza;William Roberts Clark

  • Electoral Institutions, Cabinet Negotiations, and Budget Deficits within the European Union

    Mark Hallerberg;Juergen von Hagen

  • DEMOCRACY AND DE FACTO EXCHANGE RATE REGIMES

    David H. Bearce;Mark Hallerberg

  • Who Decides the Budget?: A Political Economy Analysis of the Budget Process in Latin America

    Carlos Scartascini;Ernesto H. Stein;Emmanuel Abuelafia;Sergio Berensztein

  • On the Cyclicality of Public Finances in Europe

    Mark Hallerberg;Rolf Strauch

  • Fiscal federalism reforms in the European Union and the Greek crisis

    Mark Hallerberg

  • Explaining Instability in the Stability and Growth Pact: The Contribution of Member State Power and Euroskepticism to the Euro Crisis

    Nicole Rae Baerg;Mark Hallerberg

  • Tax Competition in Wilhelmine Germany and its Implications for the European Union

    Mark Hallerberg

  • When Do You Get Economists as Policy Makers

    Mark Hallerberg;Joachim Wehner

  • The design of fiscal rules and forms of governance in European Union countries

    Mark Hallerberg;Rolf Strauch;Juergen von Hagen;Juergen von Hagen;Juergen von Hagen

  • Political Power, Fiscal Institutions and Budgetary Outcomes in Central and Eastern Europe

    Mark Hallerberg;Sami Yläoutinen

  • Explaining changes in tax burdens in Latin America: Do politics trump economics?

    Mark Hallerberg;Carlos Scartascini

  • The Role of Parliamentary Committees in the Budgetary Process within Europe

    Mark Hallerberg

  • The Political Business Cycles of EU Accession Countries

    M. Hallerberg;L. Vinhas de Souza

  • Tax Reforms in Latin America in an Era of DemocracyIDB Working Paper No. IDB-WP-457

    Diego Focanti;Mark Hallerberg;Carlos Scartascini

Frequent Co-Authors

Juergen von Hagen
Juergen von Hagen University of Bonn
Carlos Scartascini
Carlos Scartascini Inter-American Development Bank
Guntram B. Wolff
Guntram B. Wolff Université Libre de Bruxelles
Aníbal Pérez-Liñán
Aníbal Pérez-Liñán University of Notre Dame
Ernesto Stein
Ernesto Stein Inter-American Development Bank
Bernardo Mueller
Bernardo Mueller University of Brasília
Lee J. Alston
Lee J. Alston Indiana University
Thomas D. Willett
Thomas D. Willett Claremont Graduate University
Roberto Perotti
Roberto Perotti Bocconi University
Augustin Landier
Augustin Landier Hautes Etudes Commerciales de Paris

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Political Science in the USA opens the door to a range of interdisciplinary career paths. Many students enhance their political science background by exploring programs such as online librarian programs, which are ideal for those interested in research, public policy, or archiving political documents.

For those drawn to understanding societal development, exploring various history degree types can provide valuable context for political systems and global events. Combining Political Science with related disciplines is also possible through an interdisciplinary studies online degree, offering flexibility for careers in government, education, or consulting.

At the graduate level, programs like online art history master's programs can deepen your understanding of cultural influences in politics and global affairs. These related online degrees not only broaden your academic horizons but also expand job prospects in diverse fields, from public service to academia and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Mark Hallerberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles