World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
34
Citations
8435
World Ranking
815
National Ranking
434

Nathan M. Jensen publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan M. Jensen sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 87 publications — 24th percentile

24% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Nathan M. Jensen D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nathan M. Jensen sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nathan M. Jensen is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their research spans multiple disciplines within economics and social sciences, with notable contributions in areas that intersect economics, political science, and development studies.

The researcher's main fields of study include Economics, Econometrics and Finance as well as Social Sciences. Their work further breaks down into subfields such as Economics and Econometrics, Political Science and International Relations, Sociology and Political Science, Strategy and Management, and Soil Science. This diverse range of subfields highlights their engagement with both quantitative economic analysis and political-social dynamics.

Their research addresses a variety of topics, including:

  • Local Government Finance and Decentralization
  • Taxation and Compliance Studies
  • Corruption and Economic Development
  • Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems
  • Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
  • Agricultural risk and resilience
  • Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare

Nathan M. Jensen has published in several academic venues, with frequent contributions to:

  • Business and Politics
  • AEA Randomized Controlled Trials
  • Food Policy
  • Quarterly Journal of Political Science
  • Journal of Arid Environments

Some recent papers authored or co-authored by Jensen include:

  • "Electoral Institutions and Electoral Cycles in Investment Incentives: A Field Experiment on Over 3,000 U.S. Municipalities," 2020, American Journal of Political Science
  • "Who's Afraid of Sunlight? Explaining Opposition to Transparency in Economic Development," 2021, Business and Politics

Jensen has also been linked as a co-author with several researchers, with multiple collaborations noted with Daniel Nielson and Calvin Thrall, as well as partnerships with Elizabeth Bageant, Erin Lentz, and Sudha Narayanan.

Their contributions highlight an engagement with empirical research methods, field experiments, and policy analysis, reflecting a combination of quantitative assessment and qualitative insights into governance, transparency, and economic outcomes at local and international levels.

Best Publications

  • Democratic Governance and Multinational Corporations: Political Regimes and Inflows of Foreign Direct Investment

    Nathan M. Jensen

  • Resource Wealth and Political Regimes in Africa

    Nathan Jensen;Leonard Wantchekon

  • Nation-States and the Multinational Corporation

    Nathan M. Jensen

  • Nation-States and the Multinational Corporation: A Political Economy of Foreign Direct Investment

    Nathan M. Jensen

  • Political Risk, Democratic Institutions, and Foreign Direct Investment

    Nathan Jensen

  • Independent Actor or Agent? An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of U.S. Interests on International Monetary Fund Conditions

    Axel Dreher;Nathan M. Jensen

  • Independent Actor or Agent? An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of US Interests on IMF Conditions

    Axel Dreher;Nathan Jensen

  • Foreign Direct Investment and Income Inequality in Mexico, 1990–2000

    Nathan M. Jensen;Guillermo Rosas

  • Understanding corruption and firm responses in cross-national firm-level surveys

    Nathan M Jensen;Quan Li;Aminur Rahman

  • Politics and Foreign Direct Investment

    Nathan M. Jensen;Glen Biglaiser;Quan Li;Edmund Malesky

  • Crisis, Conditions, and Capital The Effect of International Monetary Fund Agreements on Foreign Direct Investment Inflows

    Nathan M. Jensen

  • Field experiments in strategy research

    Aaron K. Chatterji;Michael Findley;Nathan M. Jensen;Stephan Meier

  • Political Risk, Reputation, and the Resource Curse:

    Nathan M. Jensen;Noel P. Johnston

  • Unbundling the Relationship between Authoritarian Legislatures and Political Risk

    Nathan M. Jensen;Edmund Malesky;Stephen Weymouth

  • Market Responses to Politics: The Rise of Lula and the Decline of the Brazilian Stock Market

    Nathan M. Jensen;Scott Schmith

  • Electoral Competition and Agricultural Support in OECD Countries

    Jong Hee Park;Nathan Jensen

  • Monopoly Money: Foreign Investment and Bribery in Vietnam, a Survey Experiment

    Edmund J. Malesky;Dimitar D. Gueorguiev;Nathan M. Jensen

  • Country or leader? Political change and UN general assembly voting

    Axel Dreher;Nathan M. Jensen

  • Globalization and the Politics of Natural Resources

    Nita Rudra;Nathan M. Jensen

  • Incentives to Pander: How Politicians Use Corporate Welfare for Political Gain

    Nathan M. Jensen;Edmund J. Malesky

  • Federal Institutions and Multinational Investors: Federalism, Government Credibility, and Foreign Direct Investment

    Nathan Jensen;Fiona McGillivray

  • A Violent Future? Political Risk Insurance Markets and Violence Forecasts

    Nathan M. Jensen;Daniel J. Young

  • Can Results-Free Review Reduce Publication Bias? The Results and Implications of a Pilot Study:

    Michael G. Findley;Nathan M. Jensen;Edmund J. Malesky;Thomas B. Pepinsky

  • Nonstate Actors and Compliance with International Agreements: An Empirical Analysis of the OECD Anti-Bribery Convention

    Nathan M. Jensen;Edmund J. Malesky

  • Political Liabilities Surviving Banking Crises

    Adriana Crespo-Tenorio;Nathan M. Jensen;Guillermo Rosas

  • Incentives to Pander

    Nathan M. Jensen;Edmund J. Malesky

  • Competing for global capital or local voters? The politics of business location incentives

    Nathan M. Jensen;Edmund J. Malesky;Matthew Walsh

  • Economic reform, state capture, and international investment in transition economies

    Nathan Jensen;Nathan Jensen

Frequent Co-Authors

Edmund J. Malesky
Edmund J. Malesky Duke University
Axel Dreher
Axel Dreher Heidelberg University
Quan Li
Quan Li Texas A&M University
Michael G. Findley
Michael G. Findley The University of Texas at Austin
Stephan Meier
Stephan Meier Columbia University
Daniel L. Nielson
Daniel L. Nielson Brigham Young University
Ilan Alon
Ilan Alon Ariel University
Aaron K. Chatterji
Aaron K. Chatterji Duke University
Kevin P. Gallagher
Kevin P. Gallagher Boston University
Gary Clyde Hufbauer
Gary Clyde Hufbauer Peterson Institute for International Economics

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science opens doors to a variety of career options and further study. For those seeking additional skills or wanting to broaden their expertise, there are easy certifications that pay well which can be completed online and quickly boost your earning potential.

Interested in advancing your qualifications fast? Consider enrolling in fastest masters degree online programs, which let you earn a respected credential in less time than traditional routes.

Affordability is also a major concern for many students. Fortunately, there are affordable colleges online offering accredited programs in political science and related fields, helping you minimize student debt.

Graduates with political science backgrounds often find rewarding roles in government, policy analysis, teaching, and the nonprofit sector. For those considering intersecting fields, discover jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree salaries to see how diverse your career options can be.

Best Scientists Citing Nathan M. Jensen

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles