World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Political Science

D-Index
31
Citations
7055
World Ranking
1055
National Ranking
542

Daniel L. Nielson publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel L. Nielson sits on this spectrum.

36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36 publications 333+

This scientist: 92 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

Daniel L. Nielson D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel L. Nielson sits on this spectrum.

20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 31 D-Index — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel L. Nielson is affiliated with The University of Texas at Austin in the United States. Their work primarily spans the social sciences, with a strong focus on sociology and political science, economics and econometrics, political science and international relations, safety research, and communication. They have published extensively across these fields, contributing notably to the understanding of political accountability, taxation, and local governance.

The researcher has produced a range of recent papers, including:

  • Owning It: Accountability and Citizens' Ownership over Oil, Aid, and Taxes (2021), The Journal of Politics
  • Do Indirect Taxes Bite? How Hiding Taxes Erases Accountability Demands from Citizens (2023), The Journal of Politics
  • Foreign aid, oil revenues, and political accountability: Evidence from six experiments in Ghana and Uganda (2020), The Review of International Organizations
  • Electoral Institutions and Electoral Cycles in Investment Incentives: A Field Experiment on Over 3,000 U.S. Municipalities (2020), American Journal of Political Science
  • Individualized Text Messages about Public Services Fail to Sway Voters: Evidence from a Field Experiment on Ugandan Elections (2021), Journal of Experimental Political Science

Their collaborative work includes frequent partnerships with several scholars, such as Michael G. Findley, J. C. Sharman, Brandon De La Cuesta, Lucy Martin, and Helen V. Milner. These collaborations often intersect with themes in political accountability and governance.

Daniel L. Nielson's publications are frequently found in venues such as:

  • The Journal of Politics
  • The Review of International Organizations
  • American Journal of Political Science
  • Business and Politics
  • Harvard Dataverse

Their research topics cover a variety of themes with particular emphasis on:

  • Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
  • Taxation and Compliance Studies
  • Local Government Finance and Decentralization
  • Media Influence and Politics
  • Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth
  • Social Media and Politics
  • Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy

Among their contributions to academic literature is a book titled Signatures for Sale: How Nominee Services for Shell Companies are Abused to Conceal Beneficial Owners, published in 2022 by Washington, DC: World Bank eBooks. This work aligns with their interest in transparency, governance, and regulatory challenges.

Best Publications

  • Delegation and agency in international organizations

    Darren G. Hawkins;David A. Lake;Daniel L. Nielson;Michael J. Tierney

  • Delegation to International Organizations: Agency Theory and World Bank Environmental Reform

    Daniel L. Nielson;Michael J. Tierney

  • More Dollars than Sense: Refining Our Knowledge of Development Finance Using AidData

    Michael J. Tierney;Daniel L. Nielson;Darren G. Hawkins;J. Timmons Roberts

  • Delegation and Agency in International Organizations: Delegation under anarchy: states, international organizations, and principal-agent theory

    Darren Hawkins;David A. Lake;Daniel L. Nielson;Michael J. Tierney

  • Foreign Aid Shocks as a Cause of Violent Armed Conflict

    Richard A. Nielsen;Michael G. Findley;Zachary S. Davis;Tara Candland

  • Bridging the rationalist–constructivist divide: re-engineering the culture of the World Bank

    Daniel L. Nielson;Michael J. Tierney;Catherine Elizabeth Weaver

  • Supplying Trade Reform: Political Institutions and Liberalization in Middle‐Income Presidential Democracies

    Daniel L. Nielson

  • Field experiments in strategy research

    Aaron K. Chatterji;Michael Findley;Nathan M. Jensen;Stephan Meier

  • Delegation and Agency in International Organizations: Who delegates? Alternative models of principals in development aid

    Mona M. Lyne;Daniel L. Nielson;Michael J. Tierney

  • Global Shell Games: Experiments in Transnational Relations, Crime, and Terrorism

    Michael G. Findley;Daniel L. Nielson;Jason Campbell Sharman

  • Controlling coalitions: Social lending at the multilateral development banks

    Mona M. Lyne;Daniel L. Nielson;Michael J. Tierney

  • Yielding Sovereignty to International Institutions: Bringing System Structure Back In1

    Scott Cooper;Darren Hawkins;Wade Jacoby;Daniel Nielson

  • Theory, Data, and Hypothesis Testing: World Bank Environmental Reform Redux

    Daniel L. Nielson;Michael J. Tierney

  • Constitutional Change in Colombia Policy Adjustment Through Institutional Reform

    Daniel L. Nielson;Matthew Soberg Shugart

  • Voter information campaigns and political accountability: Cumulative findings from a preregistered meta-analysis of coordinated trials.

    Thad Dunning;Guy Grossman;Macartan Humphreys;Susan D. Hyde

  • Dodging Adverse Selection: How Donor Type and Governance Condition Aid’s Effects on School Enrollment

    Zachary Christensen;Dustin Homer;Daniel L. Nielson

  • Who Controls Foreign Aid? Elite versus Public Perceptions of Donor Influence in Aid-Dependent Uganda

    Michael G. Findley;Adam S. Harris;Helen V. Milner;Daniel L. Nielson

  • Citizen preferences and public goods: comparing preferences for foreign aid and government programs in Uganda

    Helen V. Milner;Daniel L. Nielson;Michael G. Findley

  • Using Field Experiments in International Relations: A Randomized Study of Anonymous Incorporation1

    Michael G. Findley;Daniel L. Nielson;Jason Campbell Sharman

  • Dependence Networks and the International Criminal Court

    Jay Goodliffe;Darren Hawkins;Christine Horne;Daniel L. Nielson

  • The choice among aid donors: The effects of multilateral vs. bilateral aid on recipient behavioral support

    Michael G. Findley;Helen V. Milner;Daniel L. Nielson

  • Global Shell Games: List of Figures

    Michael G. Findley;Daniel L. Nielson;J. C. Sharman

  • Foreign Aid Shocks as a Cause of Violent Armed Conflict

    Michael Findley;Rich Nielsen;Tara Candland;Daniel L. Nielson

  • Foreign Aid Shocks as a Cause of Violent Armed Conflict Supporting Information Appendix

    Richard A. Nielsen;Michael G. Findley;Zachary S. Davis;Tara Candland

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael G. Findley
Michael G. Findley The University of Texas at Austin
Jason Campbell Sharman
Jason Campbell Sharman University of Cambridge
Helen V. Milner
Helen V. Milner Princeton University
Darren Hawkins
Darren Hawkins Brigham Young University
Stephan Meier
Stephan Meier Columbia University
David A. Lake
David A. Lake University of California, San Diego
Nathan M. Jensen
Nathan M. Jensen The University of Texas at Austin
Stephen Knack
Stephen Knack World Bank
Scott Morgenstern
Scott Morgenstern University of Pittsburgh
Aaron K. Chatterji
Aaron K. Chatterji Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science in the USA opens up a range of flexible online education options and career routes. Many students look at specialized programs like online MA history programs to gain deeper knowledge and transferable research skills that complement political science backgrounds.

If you’re considering a shorter path to employment, there are also easy certifications to get online that pay well. These can help you quickly enter government, public policy, or administrative roles without committing to a full degree program.

Time and affordability are crucial factors. For those who want to fast-track their education, there are quick masters degrees online that allow you to finish graduate studies more efficiently. If you are budget-conscious, choosing one of the cheapest online degrees can help reduce your tuition costs while earning a recognized credential.

Whether you’re balancing work or looking to save on costs, these alternative online pathways can expand your political science expertise and career opportunities.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel L. Nielson

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles