World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
David F. Kallmes

David F. Kallmes

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
118
Citations
57242
World Ranking
4029
National Ranking
2206

David F. Kallmes publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Kallmes sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 1,042 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

David F. Kallmes D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David F. Kallmes sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 118 D-Index — 80th percentile

80% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

David F. Kallmes is affiliated with the Mayo Clinic in the United States and has contributed extensively to medical research, primarily in the field of Medicine with a focus on neurology and related subfields. Their work spans diverse areas including neurology, epidemiology, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, internal medicine, and surgery.

The scientist has a significant publication record in specific subfields such as:

  • Neurology
  • Epidemiology
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Internal Medicine
  • Surgery

Major research topics covered by David F. Kallmes include:

  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
  • Intracranial Aneurysms: Treatment and Complications
  • Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Vascular Malformations Diagnosis and Treatment

Frequent publication venues for their research reflect a focus on neuroradiology and neurosurgery-related topics:

  • Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
  • Interventional Neuroradiology
  • American Journal of Neuroradiology
  • Stroke
  • Radiology

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by David F. Kallmes emphasize technical and clinical aspects of neuroradiology and cerebrovascular disease treatment. Representative recent works include:

  • Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: technical aspects (2024, American Journal of Neuroradiology)
  • COVID-19 Imaging: What We Know Now and What Remains Unknown (2021, Radiology)
  • Prospective study on embolization of intracranial aneurysms with the pipeline device (PREMIER study): 3-year results with the application of a flow diverter specific occlusion classification (2022, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery)
  • Long-term outcomes of flow diversion for unruptured intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2022, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery)
  • Systematic review and meta-analysis of current rates of first pass effect by thrombectomy technique and associations with clinical outcomes (2021, Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery)

David F. Kallmes has a network of frequent collaborators reflecting joint efforts in neuroradiology and intervention research. These co-authors include:

  • Ramanathan Kadirvel
  • Waleed Brinjikji
  • Sherief Ghozy
  • Hassan Kobeissi
  • Cem Bilgin

Best Publications

  • A randomized trial of vertebroplasty for osteoporotic spinal fractures

    David F. Kallmes;Bryan A. Comstock;Patrick J. Heagerty;Judith A. Turner

  • Percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral body compression fractures: Technical aspects

    Mary E. Jensen;Avery J. Evans;John M. Mathis;David F. Kallmes

  • Intracranial Gadolinium Deposition after Contrast-enhanced MR Imaging.

    Robert J. McDonald;Jennifer S. McDonald;David F. Kallmes;Mark E. Jentoft

  • Recommendations on Angiographic Revascularization Grading Standards for Acute Ischemic Stroke A Consensus Statement

    Osama O. Zaidat;Albert J. Yoo;Pooja Khatri;Thomas A. Tomsick

  • Systematic Literature Review of Imaging Features of Spinal Degeneration in Asymptomatic Populations

    W. Brinjikji;P. H. Luetmer;B. Comstock;B. W. Bresnahan

  • Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: associated clinical and radiologic findings.

    Jennifer E. Fugate;Daniel O. Claassen;Harry J. Cloft;David F. Kallmes

  • Pipeline for uncoilable or failed aneurysms: results from a multicenter clinical trial.

    Tibor Becske;David F. Kallmes;Isil Saatci;Cameron G. McDougall

  • Endovascular Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms With Flow Diverters A Meta-Analysis

    Waleed Brinjikji;Mohammad H. Murad;Giuseppe Lanzino;Harry J. Cloft

  • Complications of diagnostic cerebral angiography: evaluation of 19,826 consecutive patients.

    Timothy J. Kaufmann;John Huston;Jay N. Mandrekar;Cathy D. Schleck

  • International retrospective study of the pipeline embolization device: a multicenter aneurysm treatment study

    David F. Kallmes;R. Hanel;D. Lopes;E. Boccardi

  • A New Endoluminal, Flow-Disrupting Device for Treatment of Saccular Aneurysms

    David F. Kallmes;Yong Hong Ding;Daying Dai;Ramanathan Kadirvel

  • MRI Findings of Disc Degeneration are More Prevalent in Adults with Low Back Pain than in Asymptomatic Controls: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

    W. Brinjikji;F.E. Diehn;J.G. Jarvik;C.M. Carr

  • New fractures after vertebroplasty: adjacent fractures occur significantly sooner.

    Andrew T. Trout;D. F. Kallmes;T. J. Kaufmann

  • Long-Term Clinical and Angiographic Outcomes Following Pipeline Embolization Device Treatment of Complex Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms: Five-Year Results of the Pipeline for Uncoilable or Failed Aneurysms Trial

    Tibor Becske;Waleed Brinjikji;Matthew B. Potts;David F. Kallmes

  • Frequency of Acute Kidney Injury Following Intravenous Contrast Medium Administration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

    Jennifer S. McDonald;Robert J. McDonald;Jules Comin;Eric E. Williamson

  • The effects of changes in utilization and technological advancements of cross-sectional imaging on radiologist workload.

    Robert J. McDonald;Kara M. Schwartz;Laurence J. Eckel;Felix E. Diehn

  • Intravenous Contrast Material–induced Nephropathy: Causal or Coincident Phenomenon?

    Robert J. McDonald;Jennifer S. McDonald;John P. Bida;Rickey E. Carter

  • Method and system for fusing a spinal region

    Gregory A. Helm;David F. Kallmes;Gerald R. Hankins;Mary E. Jensen

  • Risk of Intravenous Contrast Material–mediated Acute Kidney Injury: A Propensity Score–matched Study Stratified by Baseline-estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate

    Jennifer S. McDonald;Robert J. McDonald;Rickey E. Carter;Richard W. Katzberg

  • Frequency of acute Kidney injury Following intravenous contrast Medium administration: A Systematic Review and

    Jennifer S. McDonald;Robert J. McDonald;Jules Comin;Eric E. Williamson

Frequent Co-Authors

Harry J. Cloft
Harry J. Cloft Mayo Clinic
Giuseppe Lanzino
Giuseppe Lanzino Mayo Clinic
David Fiorella
David Fiorella Stony Brook University
Adnan H. Siddiqui
Adnan H. Siddiqui University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Patrick J. Heagerty
Patrick J. Heagerty University of Washington
Rachelle Buchbinder
Rachelle Buchbinder Monash University
Elad I. Levy
Elad I. Levy University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Albert J. Yoo
Albert J. Yoo Harvard University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Considering a career in medicine doesn’t always require becoming a physician. There are several rewarding pathways in healthcare that can be pursued through flexible and affordable online degrees. For students interested in overseeing hospital operations or managing health facilities, check out the cheapest master's in healthcare administration programs. These options make it easier to start a leadership career without incurring massive debt.

Those aiming for advanced clinical roles might explore the cheapest dnp program options, which prepare nurses for top-tier positions in patient care and healthcare policy. Alternatively, embarking on an online educational path to become a pharmacist is now more accessible with an online pharmacist degree.

If you’re interested in the critical field of managing health information, pursue a him bachelor's degree online. Each pathway offers unique opportunities and flexible learning, making it easier for students to align their education with their career goals in healthcare.

Best Scientists Citing David F. Kallmes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles