World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
88
Citations
50645
World Ranking
12900
National Ranking
181

Antonio Artigas publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Artigas sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 429 publications — 45th percentile

45% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Antonio Artigas D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Antonio Artigas sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 88 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Internal medicine
  • Surgery
  • Disease

His primary areas of study are Intensive care, Intensive care medicine, Sepsis, Septic shock and Intensive care unit. Antonio Artigas has included themes like Mechanical ventilation, Anesthesiology, Lung injury, Resuscitation and Pediatrics in his Intensive care study. His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Clinical trial, Incidence, Survival rate, ARDS and Severity of illness.

In his study, Hypoxemia and Consensus conference is inextricably linked to Etiology, which falls within the broad field of ARDS. Sepsis is the subject of his research, which falls under Internal medicine. The Intensive care unit study combines topics in areas such as Organ dysfunction and Emergency medicine.

His most cited work include:

  • The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS: Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination (5408 citations)
  • Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in adults with septic shock (894 citations)
  • Efficacy and safety of tifacogin (recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor) in severe sepsis: a randomized controlled trial. (806 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Antonio Artigas mostly deals with Intensive care medicine, Intensive care, Sepsis, Internal medicine and Intensive care unit. He interconnects Clinical trial, ARDS, Mechanical ventilation, Anesthesiology and Severity of illness in the investigation of issues within Intensive care medicine. His studies deal with areas such as Resuscitation and Medical emergency as well as Intensive care.

His Sepsis study incorporates themes from Anesthesia and Lung injury. The study incorporates disciplines such as Gastroenterology, Surgery and Cardiology in addition to Internal medicine. His study on Intensive care unit also encompasses disciplines like

  • Emergency medicine that connect with fields like Cohort study,
  • Prospective cohort study that intertwine with fields like Pediatrics.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Intensive care medicine (30.89%)
  • Intensive care (21.71%)
  • Sepsis (25.38%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2017-2021)?

  • ARDS (16.82%)
  • Internal medicine (25.08%)
  • Intensive care medicine (30.89%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His main research concerns ARDS, Internal medicine, Intensive care medicine, Intensive care unit and Mechanical ventilation. The various areas that Antonio Artigas examines in his ARDS study include Lipopolysaccharide, Breathing, Lung injury and Acute respiratory distress. Antonio Artigas combines subjects such as Gastroenterology and Cardiology with his study of Internal medicine.

His work carried out in the field of Intensive care medicine brings together such families of science as Precision medicine, Clinical trial, Coronavirus disease 2019 and Anesthesiology. The concepts of his Intensive care unit study are interwoven with issues in Prospective cohort study, Procalcitonin and Emergency medicine. His Intensive care research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Clinical endpoint, Logistic regression, Retrospective cohort study and Sepsis.

Between 2017 and 2021, his most popular works were:

  • Second consensus on the assessment of sublingual microcirculation in critically ill patients: results from a task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (133 citations)
  • The contribution of frailty, cognition, activity of daily life and comorbidities on outcome in acutely admitted patients over 80 years in European ICUs: the VIP2 study (60 citations)
  • Efficacy and safety of trimodulin, a novel polyclonal antibody preparation, in patients with severe community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, multicenter, phase II trial (CIGMA study) (47 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Internal medicine
  • Surgery
  • Disease

His scientific interests lie mostly in Intensive care unit, Internal medicine, Intensive care medicine, ARDS and Anesthesiology. His Intensive care unit research also works with subjects such as

  • Intensive care, Activities of daily living, Polypharmacy and Proportional hazards model most often made with reference to Prospective cohort study,
  • Emergency medicine, which have a strong connection to Logistic regression, Cohort, De-escalation and Antibiotics. His research investigates the connection with Internal medicine and areas like Cardiology which intersect with concerns in Breathing and Pulse pressure.

His Intensive care medicine research includes elements of Breath gas analysis, Clinical trial, Human studies and Respiratory pathogen. His ARDS research incorporates themes from Diffuse alveolar damage, Acute respiratory distress, Lung injury and Mechanical ventilation. His work deals with themes such as Septic shock, Sepsis and Ventilator-associated pneumonia, Pneumonia, which intersect with Cohort study.

Best Publications

  • The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS: Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination

    G R Bernard;A Artigas;K L Brigham;J Carlet

  • The Surviving Sepsis Campaign: results of an international guideline-based performance improvement program targeting severe sepsis.

    Mitchell M. Levy;R Phillip Dellinger;Sean R. Townsend;Walter T. Linde-Zwirble

  • Empiric Antibiotic Treatment Reduces Mortality in Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock From the First Hour: Results From a Guideline-Based Performance Improvement Program*

    Ricard Ferrer;Ignacio Martin-Loeches;Gary Phillips;Tiffany M. Osborn

  • Surviving Sepsis Campaign: Association Between Performance Metrics and Outcomes in a 7.5-year Study

    Mitchell M. Levy;Andrew Rhodes;Gary S. Phillips;Sean R. Townsend

  • Epidemiology of sepsis and infection in ICU patients from an international multicentre cohort study.

    Corinne Alberti;Christian Brun-Buisson;Hilmar Burchardi;Claudio Martin

  • Drotrecogin alfa (activated) in adults with septic shock

    V. Marco Ranieri;B. Taylor Thompson;Philip S. Barie;Jean-François Dhainaut

  • Discovery and validation of cell cycle arrest biomarkers in human acute kidney injury.

    Kianoush B Kashani;Ali Al-Khafaji;Thomas Ardiles;Antonio Artigas

  • Efficacy and safety of tifacogin (recombinant tissue factor pathway inhibitor) in severe sepsis: a randomized controlled trial.

    Edward Abraham;Konrad Reinhart;Steven Opal;Ignace Demeyer

  • The Logistic Organ Dysfunction System: A New Way to Assess Organ Dysfunction in the Intensive Care Unit

    Jean-Roger Le Gall;Janelle Klar;Stanley Lemeshow;Fabienne Saulnier

  • Improvement in process of care and outcome after a multicenter severe sepsis educational program in Spain.

    Ricard Ferrer;Antonio Artigas;Mitchell M. Levy;Jesús Blanco

  • Report of the American-European consensus conference on ARDS: definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes and clinical trial coordination. The Consensus Committee.

    G. R. Bernard;A. Artigas;K. L. Brigham;J. Carlet

  • Cristaloides y coloides en la reanimación del paciente crítico

    J. Garnacho-Montero;E. Fernández-Mondéjar;R. Ferrer-Roca;M.E. Herrera-Gutiérrez

  • Continuous Aspiration of Subglottic Secretions in Preventing Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

    Jordi Valles;Antonio Artigas;Jordi Rello;Natalia Bonsoms

  • The Logistic Organ Dysfunction system. A new way to assess organ dysfunction in the intensive care unit. ICU Scoring Group.

    J R Le Gall;J Klar;S Lemeshow;F Saulnier

  • Outcomes of the Surviving Sepsis Campaign in intensive care units in the USA and Europe: a prospective cohort study

    Mitchell M Levy;Antonio Artigas;Gary S Phillips;Andrew Rhodes

  • Pneumonia in intubated patients: role of respiratory airway care.

    Jordi Rello;Rosario Sonora;Paola Jubert;Antonio Artigas

  • The American-European Consensus Conference on ARDS, part 2: Ventilatory, pharmacologic, supportive therapy, study design strategies, and issues related to recovery and remodeling. Acute respiratory distress syndrome.

    Antonio Artigas;Gordon R. Bernard;Jean Carlet;Didier Dreyfuss

  • Ventilator-associated pneumonia by Staphylococcus aureus. Comparison of methicillin-resistant and methicillin-sensitive episodes.

    J Rello;A Torres;M Ricart;J Valles

  • Report of the American-European Consensus Conference on acute respiratory distress syndrome: Definitions, mechanisms, relevant outcomes, and clinical trial coordination☆

    Gordon R. Bernard;Antonio Artigas;Kenneth L. Brigham;Jean Carlet

  • Fluid challenges in intensive care: the FENICE study: A global inception cohort study

    Maurizio Cecconi;Christoph Hofer;Jean-Louis Teboul;Ville Pettila

Frequent Co-Authors

Marcus J. Schultz
Marcus J. Schultz University of Amsterdam
Jean Louis Vincent
Jean Louis Vincent Université Libre de Bruxelles
Mitchell M. Levy
Mitchell M. Levy Brown University
John G. Laffey
John G. Laffey University of Galway
Antoni Torres
Antoni Torres University of Barcelona
Charles L. Sprung
Charles L. Sprung Hebrew University of Jerusalem
Gordon R. Bernard
Gordon R. Bernard Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Michael R. Pinsky
Michael R. Pinsky University of Pittsburgh
Jordi Rello
Jordi Rello Instituto de Salud Carlos III
Jean Carlet
Jean Carlet St. Joseph Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Deciding how to advance your medical education or pivot into a healthcare career can be challenging, especially with so many online options now available. For students seeking leadership roles in nursing, affordable dnp programs provide a way to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree online, making advanced credentials more accessible without the high price tag.

If you’re beginning your journey or looking for a fast entry into the healthcare workforce, online lpn programs offer efficient and flexible options to become a Licensed Practical Nurse. For registered nurses aiming to specialize, an msn to pmhnp online enables you to become a Psychiatric Mental Health Nurse Practitioner while balancing work and study.

Not all medical careers require direct patient care—there's also a growing demand for managers and administrators in health services. Those interested in this path should consider online healthcare administration programs for flexible, cost-effective ways to prepare for leadership roles in clinics, hospitals, and public health organizations.

Best Scientists Citing Antonio Artigas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles