World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

Helen Doll publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen Doll sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Helen Doll D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen Doll sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Helen Doll is affiliated with the University of East Anglia in the United Kingdom, focusing their research primarily within the field of Medicine. Their work spans several subfields, including Genetics, Immunology and Allergy, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Physiology, and Clinical Psychology.

Their recent scholarly contributions include the following papers:

  • Admission avoidance hospital at home, 2024, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
  • The Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD™): a clinical outcome measure for the severity of atopic dermatitis, 2022, British Journal of Dermatology
  • Validation of the 5-domain Niemann-Pick type C Clinical Severity Scale, 2021, Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
  • Psychometric properties of the itch numeric rating scale, skin pain numeric rating scale, and atopic dermatitis sleep scale in adult patients with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, 2021, Health and Quality of Life Outcomes
  • Meaningful changes for efficacy outcomes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, 2023, World Allergy Organization Journal

Helen Doll frequently collaborates with other researchers. Their frequent co-authors include:

  • Amy Howerter
  • Tara Symonds
  • Stephen Crawford
  • Heather Romero
  • Marc C. Patterson

Their work appears often in journals such as:

  • Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
  • Molecular Genetics and Metabolism
  • Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma & Leukemia
  • SLEEP
  • Neurology

The primary topics addressed in their research include:

  • Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Genetic and Kidney Cyst Diseases
  • Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Family and Disability Support Research
  • Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
  • Neonatal Respiratory Health Research

Best Publications

  • The prevalence of mental disorders among the homeless in western countries: systematic review and meta-regression analysis.

    Seena Fazel;Vivek Khosla;Helen Doll;John Geddes

  • Risk Factors for Bulimia Nervosa: A Community-Based Case-Control Study

    Christopher G. Fairburn;Sarah L. Welch;Helen A. Doll;Beverley A. Davies

  • Substance abuse and dependence in prisoners: a systematic review

    Seena Fazel;Parveen Bains;Helen Doll

  • Transdiagnostic Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Patients With Eating Disorders: A Two-Site Trial With 60-Week Follow-Up

    Christopher G. Fairburn;Zafra Cooper;Helen A. Doll;Marianne E. O’Connor

  • Risk factors for anorexia nervosa: three integrated case-control comparisons.

    Christopher G. Fairburn;Zafra Cooper;Helen A. Doll;Sarah L. Welch

  • The natural course of bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder in young women.

    Christopher G. Fairburn;Zafra Cooper;Helen A. Doll;Patricia Norman

  • Risk Factors for Binge Eating Disorder: A Community-Based, Case-Control Study

    Christopher G. Fairburn;Helen A. Doll;Sarah L. Welch;Phillipa J. Hay

  • Mental Disorders Among Adolescents in Juvenile Detention and Correctional Facilities: A Systematic Review and Metaregression Analysis of 25 Surveys

    Seena Fazel;Helen Doll;Niklas Långström

  • The routine use of patient reported outcome measures in healthcare settings.

    Jill Dawson;Helen Doll;Ray Fitzpatrick;Crispin Jenkinson

  • Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial

    Adam Steventon;Martin Bardsley;John Billings;Jennifer Dixon

  • Obesity and physical and emotional well-being: associations between body mass index, chronic illness, and the physical and mental components of the SF-36 questionnaire.

    Helen A. Doll;Sophie E. K. Petersen;Sarah L. Stewart-Brown

  • A Prospective Study of Outcome in Bulimia Nervosa and the Long-term Effects of Three Psychological Treatments

    Christopher G. Fairburn;Patricia A. Norman;Sarah L. Welch;Marianne E. O'Connor

  • The measurement of impairment due to eating disorder psychopathology.

    Kristin Bohn;Helen A. Doll;Zafra Cooper;Marianne O'Connor

  • Cost effectiveness of telehealth for patients with long term conditions (Whole Systems Demonstrator telehealth questionnaire study): nested economic evaluation in a pragmatic, cluster randomised controlled trial

    Catherine Henderson;Martin Knapp;Martin Knapp;José Luis Fernández;Jennifer Beecham

  • Meaningful changes for the Oxford hip and knee scores after joint replacement surgery

    David J. Beard;Kristina Harris;Jill Dawson;Helen Doll

  • The health of students in institutes of higher education: an important and neglected public health problem?

    Sarah Stewart-Brown;Julie Evans;Jacoby Patterson;Sophie Petersen

  • The severity and status of eating disorder NOS: Implications for DSM-V

    Christopher G. Fairburn;Zafra Cooper;Kristin Bohn;Marianne E. O’Connor

  • Evidence for Microvascular Dysfunction in Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: New Insights From Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging

    Steffen E. Petersen;Michael Jerosch-Herold;Lucy E. Hudsmith;Matthew D. Robson

  • Risk factors for inflammatory pseudotumour formation following hip resurfacing

    S. Glyn-Jones;H. Pandit;Ym-M. Kwon;H. Doll

  • Predictors of 12-month outcome in bulimia nervosa and the influence of attitudes to shape and weight.

    Christopher G. Fairburn;Robert C. Peveler;Rosemary Jones;R. A. Hope

Frequent Co-Authors

Ray Fitzpatrick
Ray Fitzpatrick University of Oxford
Crispin Jenkinson
Crispin Jenkinson University of Oxford
Christopher G. Fairburn
Christopher G. Fairburn University of Oxford
Andrew Carr
Andrew Carr University of Oxford
Zafra Cooper
Zafra Cooper Yale University
Sarah Stewart-Brown
Sarah Stewart-Brown University of Warwick
Nick Black
Nick Black London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
David W. Murray
David W. Murray University of Oxford
Steve Iliffe
Steve Iliffe University College London
Seena Fazel
Seena Fazel University of Oxford

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you are interested in the medical field but looking for alternative routes to a traditional MD, there are exciting online degrees and career pathways to consider. For registered nurses looking to advance their qualifications, asn to np bridge programs provide a seamless way to transition from an Associate Degree in Nursing to becoming a Nurse Practitioner, offering flexible learning while expanding your clinical impact.

Those with a passion for health, wellness, and diet may explore a bachelor's in nutrition online. This degree prepares graduates for diverse roles in health education, food industry, or community wellness settings, all from the convenience of remote study.

For leadership roles in healthcare, consider enrolling in top online mha programs that are cahme accredited. These programs are recognized for their quality and prepare students for critical management and administrative positions in the medical sector.

Additionally, registered nurses can boost their career opportunities through rn to bsn programs without clinicals, which allow for academic advancement without the need for additional on-site clinical hours.

Each of these pathways provides unique advantages and can open doors to fulfilling roles within healthcare beyond the traditional MD route.

Best Scientists Citing Helen Doll

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles