World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
34
Citations
6221
World Ranking
7529
National Ranking
21

Péter Ódor publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Péter Ódor sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 118 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Péter Ódor D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Péter Ódor sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Péter Ódor is affiliated with the Centre for Ecological Research in Hungary. Their research broadly spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences and Environmental Science, with numerous publications contributing to these areas.

The main topics addressed in their work include:

  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Lichen and Fungal Ecology
  • Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
  • Bryophyte Studies and Records
  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Botany and Plant Ecology Studies

Ódor's research is often published in several key venues, including:

  • Forest Ecology and Management
  • Acta Biologica Plantarum Agriensis
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Ecological Applications

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Péter Ódor encompass a range of subjects primarily related to forest ecosystems and biodiversity:

  • Protection gaps and restoration opportunities for primary forests in Europe, 2020, Diversity and Distributions
  • Environmental drivers of forest biodiversity in temperate mixed forests - A multi-taxon approach, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Natural disturbance regimes as a guide for sustainable forest management in Europe, 2022, Ecological Applications
  • Initial regeneration success of tree species after different forestry treatments in a sessile oak-hornbeam forest, 2020, Forest Ecology and Management
  • Handbook of field sampling for multi-taxon biodiversity studies in European forests, 2021, Ecological Indicators

The scientist has also contributed to book publications, including a title published by the Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique:

  • Handbook of sampling for multi-taxon biodiversity studies in European forests, 2022

Frequent collaborators in their work include:

  • Bence Kovács
  • Flóra Tinya
  • Réka Aszalós
  • Sabina Burrascano
  • Yoan Paillet

Best Publications

  • Biodiversity Differences between Managed and Unmanaged Forests: Meta-Analysis of Species Richness in Europe

    Yoan Paillet;Laurent Bergès;Joakim HjÄltén;Péter Ódor

  • Dead wood in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest reserves

    Morten Christensen;Katrine Hahn;Edward P. Mountford;Péter Ódor

  • Where are Europe's last primary forests?

    Francesco Maria Sabatini;Sabina Burrascano;William S. Keeton;Christian Levers

  • Diversity of dead wood inhabiting fungi and bryophytes in semi-natural beech forests in Europe

    Péter Ódor;J. Heilmann-Clausen;M. Christensen;E. Aude

  • Factors influencing epiphytic bryophyte and lichen species richness at different spatial scales in managed temperate forests

    Ildikó Király;Juri Nascimbene;Flóra Tinya;Péter Ódor

  • The effect of light conditions on herbs, bryophytes and seedlings of temperate mixed forests in Őrség, Western Hungary

    Flóra Tinya;Sára Márialigeti;Ildikó Király;Balázs Németh

  • Stand structural drivers of microclimate in mature temperate mixed forests

    Bence Kovács;Flóra Tinya;Péter Ódor

  • UPDATED CHECKLIST AND RED LIST OF HUNGARIAN BRYOPHYTES

    B. Papp;P. Erzberger;P. Ódor;P. Szövényi

  • Preferences of dead wood inhabiting bryophytes for decay stage, log size and habitat types in Hungarian beech forests

    Péter Ódor;Ad F.M. van Hees

  • The effects of stand structure on ground-floor bryophyte assemblages in temperate mixed forests

    S. Márialigeti;B. Németh;F. Tinya;P. Ódor

  • Unfolding the effects of different forestry treatments on microclimate in oak forests: results of a 4-yr experiment.

    Bence Kovács;Flóra Tinya;Csaba Németh;Péter Ódor

  • The effect of stand structure and tree species composition on epiphytic bryophytes in mixed deciduous-coniferous forests of Western Hungary

    Ildikó Király;Péter Ódor

  • Natural disturbance regimes as a guide for sustainable forest management in Europe.

    Unknown

  • Patterns and drivers of species composition of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens in managed temperate forests

    Unknown

  • Reprint of: Patterns and drivers of species composition of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens in managed temperate forests

    Péter Ódor;Ildikó Király;Flóra Tinya;Francesco Bortignon

  • Communities of wood‐inhabiting bryophytes and fungi on dead beech logs in Europe – reflecting substrate quality or shaped by climate and forest conditions?

    Jacob Heilmann-Clausen;Erik Aude;Klaas van Dort;Morten Christensen

  • Effects of forest heterogeneity on the efficiency of caterpillar control service provided by birds in temperate oak forests

    Krisztina Bereczki;Péter Ódor;György Csóka;Zsuzsa Mag

  • Environmental drivers of the composition and diversity of the herb layer in mixed temperate forests in Hungary

    Sára Márialigeti;Flóra Tinya;András Bidló;Péter Ódor

  • Environmental drivers of forest biodiversity in temperate mixed forests - A multi-taxon approach.

    Flóra Tinya;Bence Kovács;András Bidló;Bálint Dima

  • Protection gaps and restoration opportunities for primary forests in Europe

    Francesco M. Sabatini;Francesco M. Sabatini;William S. Keeton;Marcus Lindner;Miroslav Svoboda

  • Congruence of the spatial pattern of light and understory vegetation in an old-growth, temperate mixed forest

    Flóra Tinya;Péter Ódor

  • Sensitivity of ground layer vegetation diversity descriptors in indicating forest naturalness

    T. Standovár;P. Ódor;R. Aszalós;L. Gálhidy

Frequent Co-Authors

Juri Nascimbene
Juri Nascimbene University of Bologna
Sabina Burrascano
Sabina Burrascano Sapienza University of Rome
Jacob Heilmann-Clausen
Jacob Heilmann-Clausen University of Copenhagen
Tomáš Vrška
Tomáš Vrška Mendel University Brno
Tobias Kuemmerle
Tobias Kuemmerle Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Zoltán Botta-Dukát
Zoltán Botta-Dukát Institute of Ecology and Botany
Tibor Magura
Tibor Magura University of Debrecen
Miroslav Svoboda
Miroslav Svoboda Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
William S. Keeton
William S. Keeton University of Vermont
Béla Tóthmérész
Béla Tóthmérész University of Debrecen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Ecology and Evolution opens up diverse career possibilities, many of which benefit from interdisciplinary knowledge. Students interested in the social or behavioral sciences may consider supplementing their scientific expertise with an online child psychology degree. Such a pathway can lead to roles that focus on the human dimensions of environmental change and education.

For those drawn to counseling or mental health fields, there are affordable masters in counseling programs online that can complement a background in Ecology, especially for careers that bridge health and environmental advocacy.

Individuals seeking advanced training may be interested in clinical psychology master's programs online, which can lead to specialized roles supporting communities affected by environmental challenges.

If your goal is to work within social services, a human services bachelors degree online can provide quick entry into fields that benefit from ecological knowledge, such as environmental program management or nonprofit work. Diversifying your education with these online degrees can greatly expand your career options related to Ecology and Evolution.

Best Scientists Citing Péter Ódor

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles