World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
18110
World Ranking
19463
National Ranking
9690

Matthew D. Ringel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew D. Ringel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 270 publications — 11th percentile

11% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Matthew D. Ringel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Matthew D. Ringel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Matthew D. Ringel is affiliated with The Ohio State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology, with a focus on endocrine-related diseases and molecular mechanisms.

The main areas of study include:

  • Medicine
  • Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology

Within these fields, their work further specializes in subfields such as:

  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
  • Molecular Biology
  • Genetics
  • Surgery
  • Oncology

The scientist's research topics cover:

  • Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
  • BRCA gene mutations in cancer
  • Cancer-related Molecular Pathways
  • Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery
  • S100 Proteins and Annexins
  • Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Cancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism

Frequent publication venues reflect a concentration in endocrinology and oncology journals:

  • Thyroid
  • Journal of the Endocrine Society
  • The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
  • Cancer Research
  • Endocrine Related Cancer

Matthew D. Ringel has collaborated regularly with several co-authors, including:

  • Sandya Liyanarachchi
  • Pamela Brock
  • Fadi Nabhan
  • Jennifer A. Sipos
  • Neel Rajan

Some representative recent publications by the scientist include:

  • Thyroid cancer, recent advances in diagnosis and therapy, 2021, International Journal of Cancer
  • GWAS of thyroid stimulating hormone highlights pleiotropic effects and inverse association with thyroid cancer, 2020, Nature Communications
  • Active Surveillance Versus Thyroid Surgery for Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: A Systematic Review, 2022, Thyroid
  • American Head and Neck Society Endocrine Surgery Section and International Thyroid Oncology Group consensus statement on mutational testing in thyroid cancer: Defining advanced thyroid cancer and its targeted treatment, 2022, Head & Neck
  • Dabrafenib Versus Dabrafenib + Trametinib in BRAF -Mutated Radioactive Iodine Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancer: Results of a Randomized, Phase 2, Open-Label Multicenter Trial, 2022, Thyroid

Among recognitions received, Matthew D. Ringel is noted as a member of the Association of American Physicians.

Best Publications

  • Pan-cancer analysis of whole genomes

    Peter J. Campbell;Gad Getz;Jan O. Korbel;Joshua M. Stuart

  • Integrated Genomic Characterization of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma

    Nishant Agrawal;Rehan Akbani;B. Arman Aksoy;Adrian Ally

  • Medullary thyroid cancer: management guidelines of the American Thyroid Association.

    Richard T. Kloos;Charis Eng;Douglas B. Evans;Gary L. Francis

  • BRAF mutation predicts a poorer clinical prognosis for papillary thyroid cancer

    Mingzhao Xing;William H. Westra;Ralph P. Tufano;Yoram Cohen

  • Phase II Trial of Sorafenib in Metastatic Thyroid Cancer

    Richard T. Kloos;Matthew D. Ringel;Michael V. Knopp;Nathan C. Hall

  • Phase II Clinical Trial of Sorafenib in Metastatic Medullary Thyroid Cancer

    Elaine T. Lam;Matthew D. Ringel;Richard T. Kloos;Thomas W. Prior

  • Gene expression and functional evidence of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition in papillary thyroid carcinoma invasion

    Vasily Vasko;Allan V. Espinosa;William Scouten;Huiling He

  • Overexpression and Overactivation of Akt in Thyroid Carcinoma

    Matthew D. Ringel;Nicole Hayre;Jun Saito;Bertrand Saunier

  • Performance of a Multigene Genomic Classifier in Thyroid Nodules With Indeterminate Cytology: A Prospective Blinded Multicenter Study.

    David L. Steward;Sally E. Carty;Rebecca S. Sippel;Samantha Peiling Yang

  • Polymorphic mature microRNAs from passenger strand of pre-miR-146a contribute to thyroid cancer

    Krystian Jazdzewski;Sandya Liyanarachchi;Michal Swierniak;Janusz Pachucki

  • Dystrophin glycoprotein complex dysfunction: a regulatory link between muscular dystrophy and cancer cachexia.

    Swarnali Acharyya;Matthew E.R. Butchbach;Zarife Sahenk;Huating Wang

  • Multi-Institutional Phase II Study of Selumetinib in Patients With Metastatic Biliary Cancers

    Tanios Bekaii-Saab;Mitch A. Phelps;Xiaobai Li;Motoyasu Saji

  • NCCN Guidelines Insights: Thyroid Carcinoma, Version 2.2018

    Robert I. Haddad;Christian Nasr;Lindsay Bischoff;Naifa Lamki Busaidy

  • Akt activation and localisation correlate with tumour invasion and oncogene expression in thyroid cancer

    V Vasko;M Saji;E Hardy;M Kruhlak

  • Discovery of common variants associated with low TSH levels and thyroid cancer risk

    Julius Gudmundsson;Patrick Sulem;Daniel F Gudbjartsson;Jon G Jonasson

  • Metastin Receptor Is Overexpressed in Papillary Thyroid Cancer and Activates MAP Kinase in Thyroid Cancer Cells

    Matthew D. Ringel;Elena Hardy;Victor J. Bernet;Henry B. Burch

  • The PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway in initiation and progression of thyroid tumors.

    Motoyasu Saji;Matthew D. Ringel

  • Lack of therapeutic effect of the histone deacetylase inhibitor vorinostat in patients with metastatic radioiodine-refractory thyroid carcinoma.

    Jennifer A. Woyach;Richard T. Kloos;Matthew D. Ringel;Daria Arbogast

  • Clinical implications of genetic defects in G proteins. The molecular basis of McCune-Albright syndrome and Albright hereditary osteodystrophy.

    Matthew D. Ringel;William F. Schwindinger;Michael A. Levine

  • Hürthle cell neoplasms of the thyroid: are there factors predictive of malignancy?

    Herbert Chen;Theresa L. Nicol;Martha A. Zeiger;William C. Dooley

Frequent Co-Authors

Kenneth D. Burman
Kenneth D. Burman MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Albert de la Chapelle
Albert de la Chapelle The Ohio State University
Sandya Liyanarachchi
Sandya Liyanarachchi The Ohio State University
Michael A. Levine
Michael A. Levine Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Charis Eng
Charis Eng Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine
Kari Stefansson
Kari Stefansson deCODE Genetics (Iceland)
Leonard Wartofsky
Leonard Wartofsky MedStar Washington Hospital Center
Ching-Shih Chen
Ching-Shih Chen The Ohio State University
R. Michael Tuttle
R. Michael Tuttle Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center
Michael C. Ostrowski
Michael C. Ostrowski Medical University of South Carolina

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re exploring Medicine in the USA, there are several alternative pathways and related healthcare degrees you can pursue online. For those with a bachelor’s degree in a non-nursing major, direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online offer a fast-track option to becoming a nurse, combining graduate-level education with foundational nursing coursework.

Some prospective nurses seek admissions with fewer hurdles. Looking for the easiest bsn program to get into can help you start your nursing journey without high barriers such as low acceptance rates or intense prerequisites. Additionally, finding a nursing school that does not require teas test can further simplify the application process, removing a common standardized testing requirement.

If you’re interested in healthcare administration without direct patient care, training through medical billing and coding schools with financial aid is a flexible choice that’s in high demand. Each pathway and specialty has its own requirements and advantages, so carefully consider your interests, academic background, and career goals when making a choice.

Best Scientists Citing Matthew D. Ringel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles