World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Business and Management 51 945 881 55 55 242 9531

Martin Loosemore publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Martin Loosemore between 1994 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Martin Loosemore published across 32 years, from 1994 to 2025, averaging 8.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 28 publications in 2012. 16 of the 281 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1994 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 28. Peak 28 publications in 2012. 1994: 2 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 0 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 9 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 7 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 6 publications 2005: 2 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 10 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 28 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 13 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 17 publications 2019: 17 publications 2020: 16 publications 2021: 23 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 5 publications
1994 2025

281 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Martin Loosemore: publications per year, 1994 to 2025
Year Publications
1994 2
1995 1
1996 0
1997 1
1998 9
1999 8
2000 7
2001 4
2002 3
2003 4
2004 6
2005 2
2006 7
2007 4
2008 4
2009 4
2010 10
2011 10
2012 28
2013 10
2014 10
2015 13
2016 10
2017 14
2018 17
2019 17
2020 16
2021 23
2022 11
2023 10
2024 11
2025 5
Total 281
Download as CSV

Martin Loosemore publication distribution in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Business and Management in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Loosemore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 82 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 35–39 to 436+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 122. Most scientists, 122, have 95–99 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 240–244 publications, is where this scientist sits. 35–39 publications: 2 scientists 40–44 publications: 2 scientists 45–49 publications: 5 scientists 50–54 publications: 20 scientists 55–59 publications: 39 scientists 60–64 publications: 66 scientists 65–69 publications: 52 scientists 70–74 publications: 80 scientists 75–79 publications: 83 scientists 80–84 publications: 116 scientists 85–89 publications: 94 scientists 90–94 publications: 111 scientists 95–99 publications: 122 scientists 100–104 publications: 104 scientists 105–109 publications: 113 scientists 110–114 publications: 96 scientists 115–119 publications: 97 scientists 120–124 publications: 112 scientists 125–129 publications: 93 scientists 130–134 publications: 79 scientists 135–139 publications: 69 scientists 140–144 publications: 80 scientists 145–149 publications: 81 scientists 150–154 publications: 85 scientists 155–159 publications: 50 scientists 160–164 publications: 74 scientists 165–169 publications: 61 scientists 170–174 publications: 40 scientists 175–179 publications: 44 scientists 180–184 publications: 47 scientists 185–189 publications: 59 scientists 190–194 publications: 35 scientists 195–199 publications: 37 scientists 200–204 publications: 49 scientists 205–209 publications: 48 scientists 210–214 publications: 34 scientists 215–219 publications: 31 scientists 220–224 publications: 37 scientists 225–229 publications: 34 scientists 230–234 publications: 25 scientists 235–239 publications: 28 scientists 240–244 publications: 34 scientists 245–249 publications: 28 scientists 250–254 publications: 23 scientists 255–259 publications: 22 scientists 260–264 publications: 11 scientists 265–269 publications: 16 scientists 270–274 publications: 23 scientists 275–279 publications: 12 scientists 280–284 publications: 16 scientists 285–289 publications: 10 scientists 290–294 publications: 12 scientists 295–299 publications: 12 scientists 300–304 publications: 8 scientists 305–309 publications: 13 scientists 310–314 publications: 13 scientists 315–319 publications: 6 scientists 320–324 publications: 10 scientists 325–329 publications: 9 scientists 330–334 publications: 7 scientists 335–339 publications: 10 scientists 340–344 publications: 10 scientists 345–349 publications: 7 scientists 350–354 publications: 4 scientists 355–359 publications: 10 scientists 360–364 publications: 3 scientists 365–369 publications: 7 scientists 370–374 publications: 2 scientists 375–379 publications: 8 scientists 380–384 publications: 4 scientists 385–389 publications: 5 scientists 390–394 publications: 5 scientists 395–399 publications: 2 scientists 400–404 publications: 2 scientists 405–409 publications: 4 scientists 410–414 publications: 3 scientists 415–419 publications: 2 scientists 420–424 publications: 5 scientists 425–429 publications: 3 scientists 430–434 publications: 1 scientist 435 publications: 1 scientist 436+ publications: 100 scientists
35–39 publications 436+

This scientist: 242 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 436 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
35–39 2
40–44 2
45–49 5
50–54 20
55–59 39
60–64 66
65–69 52
70–74 80
75–79 83
80–84 116
85–89 94
90–94 111
95–99 122
100–104 104
105–109 113
110–114 96
115–119 97
120–124 112
125–129 93
130–134 79
135–139 69
140–144 80
145–149 81
150–154 85
155–159 50
160–164 74
165–169 61
170–174 40
175–179 44
180–184 47
185–189 59
190–194 35
195–199 37
200–204 49
205–209 48
210–214 34
215–219 31
220–224 37
225–229 34
230–234 25
235–239 28
240–244 34 242
245–249 28
250–254 23
255–259 22
260–264 11
265–269 16
270–274 23
275–279 12
280–284 16
285–289 10
290–294 12
295–299 12
300–304 8
305–309 13
310–314 13
315–319 6
320–324 10
325–329 9
330–334 7
335–339 10
340–344 10
345–349 7
350–354 4
355–359 10
360–364 3
365–369 7
370–374 2
375–379 8
380–384 4
385–389 5
390–394 5
395–399 2
400–404 2
405–409 4
410–414 3
415–419 2
420–424 5
425–429 3
430–434 1
435 1
436+ 100
Download as CSV

Martin Loosemore D-index placement in Business and Management in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Business and Management scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Martin Loosemore sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 60 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 89+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 171. Most scientists, 171, have 32 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 51 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 156 scientists 31 D-Index: 159 scientists 32 D-Index: 171 scientists 33 D-Index: 161 scientists 34 D-Index: 135 scientists 35 D-Index: 124 scientists 36 D-Index: 114 scientists 37 D-Index: 111 scientists 38 D-Index: 103 scientists 39 D-Index: 89 scientists 40 D-Index: 81 scientists 41 D-Index: 97 scientists 42 D-Index: 80 scientists 43 D-Index: 69 scientists 44 D-Index: 68 scientists 45 D-Index: 63 scientists 46 D-Index: 54 scientists 47 D-Index: 69 scientists 48 D-Index: 50 scientists 49 D-Index: 58 scientists 50 D-Index: 54 scientists 51 D-Index: 62 scientists 52 D-Index: 54 scientists 53 D-Index: 43 scientists 54 D-Index: 49 scientists 55 D-Index: 35 scientists 56 D-Index: 40 scientists 57 D-Index: 44 scientists 58 D-Index: 34 scientists 59 D-Index: 29 scientists 60 D-Index: 48 scientists 61 D-Index: 32 scientists 62 D-Index: 30 scientists 63 D-Index: 22 scientists 64 D-Index: 22 scientists 65 D-Index: 19 scientists 66 D-Index: 20 scientists 67 D-Index: 18 scientists 68 D-Index: 17 scientists 69 D-Index: 21 scientists 70 D-Index: 20 scientists 71 D-Index: 19 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 10 scientists 74 D-Index: 16 scientists 75 D-Index: 24 scientists 76 D-Index: 13 scientists 77 D-Index: 19 scientists 78 D-Index: 8 scientists 79 D-Index: 6 scientists 80 D-Index: 4 scientists 81 D-Index: 12 scientists 82 D-Index: 7 scientists 83 D-Index: 7 scientists 84 D-Index: 6 scientists 85 D-Index: 10 scientists 86 D-Index: 4 scientists 87 D-Index: 11 scientists 88 D-Index: 6 scientists 89+ D-Index: 96 scientists
30 D-Index 89+

This scientist: 51 D-Index — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 89 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Business and Management scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,017 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 156
31 159
32 171
33 161
34 135
35 124
36 114
37 111
38 103
39 89
40 81
41 97
42 80
43 69
44 68
45 63
46 54
47 69
48 50
49 58
50 54
51 62 51
52 54
53 43
54 49
55 35
56 40
57 44
58 34
59 29
60 48
61 32
62 30
63 22
64 22
65 19
66 20
67 18
68 17
69 21
70 20
71 19
72 14
73 10
74 16
75 24
76 13
77 19
78 8
79 6
80 4
81 12
82 7
83 7
84 6
85 10
86 4
87 11
88 6
89+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Martin Loosemore is affiliated with the University of Technology Sydney in Australia. Their research focuses on areas within business, management, and social sciences, with a particular emphasis on strategy and management, management science and operations research, general health professions, law, and radiological and ultrasound technology.

Their main topics of work cover public procurement and policy, construction project management and performance, legal issues in South Africa, occupational health and safety research, outsourcing and supply chain management, employment and welfare studies, and community development and social impact.

Loosemore has contributed multiple publications to notable research venues. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Engineering Construction & Architectural Management
  • Construction Management and Economics
  • Buildings
  • International Journal of Project Management
  • Smart and Sustainable Built Environment

Among their recent papers are:

  • "Relationship quality in construction projects: A subcontractor perspective of principal contractor relationships," 2021, International Journal of Project Management
  • "The institutional drivers of social procurement implementation in Australian construction projects," 2021, International Journal of Project Management

These papers reflect their focus on construction management and social procurement practices.

Martin Loosemore collaborates frequently with several coauthors including Suhair Alkilani, Riza Yosia Sunindijo, Jo Barraket, Robyn Keast, and George Denny-Smith, with whom they have multiple joint publications.

Best Publications

  • Risk allocation in the private provision of public infrastructure

    A. Ng;Martin Loosemore

  • Human Resource Management in Construction Projects: Strategic and Operational Approaches

    Martin Loosemore;Andrew Dainty;Helen Lingard

  • A theory of waste behaviour in the construction industry

    Melissa Teo;Martin Loosemore

  • Risk Management in Projects

    Martin Loosemore

  • The effect of inter-organizational justice perceptions on organizational citizenship behaviors in construction projects

    Benson T.H. Lim;Martin Loosemore

  • Communication problems with ethnic minorities in the construction industry

    Martin L. Loosemore;Patrick Lee

  • GENDER DIFFERENCES IN OCCUPATIONAL STRESS AMONG PROFESSIONALS IN THE CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRY

    Martin Loosemore;Tom Waters

  • Social procurement in UK construction projects

    Martin Loosemore

  • Barriers to implementing OHS reforms – The experiences of small subcontractors in the Australian Construction Industry

    M. Loosemore;N. Andonakis

  • Construction project management in the Persian Gulf: inter-cultural communication

    M. Loosemore;H.S.Al. Muslmani

  • Safety Training and Positive Safety Attitude Formation in the Australian Construction Industry

    M. Loosemore;N. Malouf

  • Safety implications of low-English proficiency among migrant construction site operatives

    Stephan Trajkovski;Martin Loosemore

  • Improving construction productivity: a subcontractor's perspective

    Martin Loosemore

  • Social network analysis: using a quantitative tool within an interpretative context to explore the management of construction crises

    M. Loosemore

  • Implementing systems thinking to manage risk in public private partnership projects

    M. Loosemore;E. Cheung

  • Customer‐focused benchmarking for facilities management

    M. Loosemore;Y.Y. Hsin

  • Perceptions of Contractual Risk Allocation in Construction Supply Chains

    M. Loosemore;C. S. McCarthy

  • Linking corporate social responsibility and organizational performance in the construction industry

    Martin Loosemore;Benson Teck Heng Lim

  • Crisis management in construction projects

    Martin Loosemore

  • Human Resource Management in Construction Projects

    Unknown

  • Behavioural factors influencing corrupt action in the Australian construction industry

    Jeremy Brown;Martin Loosemore

Frequent Co-Authors

Andrew R.J. Dainty
Andrew R.J. Dainty Manchester Metropolitan University
Helen Lingard
Helen Lingard RMIT University
Derek H.T. Walker
Derek H.T. Walker RMIT University
Patrick X.W. Zou
Patrick X.W. Zou Swinburne University of Technology
Steve Rowlinson
Steve Rowlinson University of Hong Kong
Baizhan Li
Baizhan Li Chongqing University
Dongping Fang
Dongping Fang Tsinghua University
Alistair G.F. Gibb
Alistair G.F. Gibb Loughborough University
Heap-Yih Chong
Heap-Yih Chong Nanjing Audit University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Business and Management students in the USA have access to a diverse range of specialized online degrees that can enhance their career prospects. For those interested in finance and analytics, an accounting degree opens doors in auditing, taxation, and corporate finance.

As technology transforms industries, pursuing ai online degrees can help professionals lead data-driven business strategies and innovation. This skill set is in high demand across sectors, from marketing to operations.

Management skills applied to the built environment are possible with a construction management online degree. This pathway prepares graduates for leadership roles managing projects, costs, and teams in the construction sector.

Experienced professionals aiming for executive leadership can consider an online executive mba. This flexible, advanced credential allows busy professionals to upgrade their management skills and expand their strategic outlook.

Each of these online degree options not only provides flexibility, but also aligns with the key trends shaping business and management careers in the modern world.

Best Scientists Citing Martin Loosemore

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles