World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Ecology and Evolution

D-Index
32
Citations
4715
World Ranking
8037
National Ranking
55

Tomáš Vrška publication distribution in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Ecology and Evolution in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomáš Vrška sits on this spectrum.

37–41 publications: 2 scientists 42–46 publications: 9 scientists 47–51 publications: 10 scientists 52–56 publications: 31 scientists 57–61 publications: 56 scientists 62–66 publications: 91 scientists 67–71 publications: 92 scientists 72–76 publications: 127 scientists 77–81 publications: 173 scientists 82–86 publications: 236 scientists 87–91 publications: 227 scientists 92–96 publications: 240 scientists 97–101 publications: 333 scientists 102–106 publications: 280 scientists 107–111 publications: 300 scientists 112–116 publications: 285 scientists 117–121 publications: 305 scientists 122–126 publications: 287 scientists 127–131 publications: 278 scientists 132–136 publications: 289 scientists 137–141 publications: 273 scientists 142–146 publications: 262 scientists 147–151 publications: 246 scientists 152–156 publications: 235 scientists 157–161 publications: 205 scientists 162–166 publications: 199 scientists 167–171 publications: 174 scientists 172–176 publications: 164 scientists 177–181 publications: 173 scientists 182–186 publications: 189 scientists 187–191 publications: 170 scientists 192–196 publications: 139 scientists 197–201 publications: 128 scientists 202–206 publications: 117 scientists 207–211 publications: 115 scientists 212–216 publications: 107 scientists 217–221 publications: 124 scientists 222–226 publications: 81 scientists 227–231 publications: 82 scientists 232–236 publications: 85 scientists 237–241 publications: 75 scientists 242–246 publications: 66 scientists 247–251 publications: 81 scientists 252–256 publications: 69 scientists 257–261 publications: 70 scientists 262–266 publications: 55 scientists 267–271 publications: 64 scientists 272–276 publications: 49 scientists 277–281 publications: 48 scientists 282–286 publications: 44 scientists 287–291 publications: 45 scientists 292–296 publications: 36 scientists 297–301 publications: 39 scientists 302–306 publications: 38 scientists 307–311 publications: 30 scientists 312–316 publications: 34 scientists 317–321 publications: 25 scientists 322–326 publications: 22 scientists 327–331 publications: 28 scientists 332–336 publications: 30 scientists 337–341 publications: 22 scientists 342–346 publications: 30 scientists 347–351 publications: 26 scientists 352–356 publications: 22 scientists 357–361 publications: 29 scientists 362–366 publications: 21 scientists 367–371 publications: 12 scientists 372–376 publications: 18 scientists 377–381 publications: 17 scientists 382–386 publications: 13 scientists 387–391 publications: 21 scientists 392–396 publications: 13 scientists 397–401 publications: 10 scientists 402–406 publications: 15 scientists 407–411 publications: 8 scientists 412–416 publications: 9 scientists 417–421 publications: 8 scientists 422–426 publications: 4 scientists 427–431 publications: 10 scientists 432–436 publications: 10 scientists 437–441 publications: 5 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 10 scientists 452–456 publications: 2 scientists 457–461 publications: 4 scientists 462–466 publications: 7 scientists 467–471 publications: 7 scientists 472–476 publications: 6 scientists 477–481 publications: 6 scientists 482–486 publications: 3 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 4 scientists 497–501 publications: 4 scientists 502–506 publications: 8 scientists 507–511 publications: 5 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 5 scientists 522–526 publications: 4 scientists 527–530 publications: 5 scientists 531+ publications: 100 scientists
37 publications 531+

This scientist: 63 publications — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 531 publications or more.

Tomáš Vrška D-index placement in Ecology and Evolution in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Ecology and Evolution scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tomáš Vrška sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 95 scientists 31 D-Index: 123 scientists 32 D-Index: 191 scientists 33 D-Index: 245 scientists 34 D-Index: 252 scientists 35 D-Index: 244 scientists 36 D-Index: 249 scientists 37 D-Index: 244 scientists 38 D-Index: 254 scientists 39 D-Index: 254 scientists 40 D-Index: 280 scientists 41 D-Index: 274 scientists 42 D-Index: 266 scientists 43 D-Index: 233 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 208 scientists 46 D-Index: 201 scientists 47 D-Index: 213 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 172 scientists 50 D-Index: 209 scientists 51 D-Index: 199 scientists 52 D-Index: 153 scientists 53 D-Index: 169 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 148 scientists 56 D-Index: 120 scientists 57 D-Index: 146 scientists 58 D-Index: 137 scientists 59 D-Index: 140 scientists 60 D-Index: 104 scientists 61 D-Index: 119 scientists 62 D-Index: 118 scientists 63 D-Index: 99 scientists 64 D-Index: 77 scientists 65 D-Index: 100 scientists 66 D-Index: 86 scientists 67 D-Index: 83 scientists 68 D-Index: 75 scientists 69 D-Index: 94 scientists 70 D-Index: 57 scientists 71 D-Index: 68 scientists 72 D-Index: 59 scientists 73 D-Index: 63 scientists 74 D-Index: 66 scientists 75 D-Index: 60 scientists 76 D-Index: 42 scientists 77 D-Index: 49 scientists 78 D-Index: 39 scientists 79 D-Index: 37 scientists 80 D-Index: 43 scientists 81 D-Index: 41 scientists 82 D-Index: 45 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 40 scientists 85 D-Index: 35 scientists 86 D-Index: 55 scientists 87 D-Index: 24 scientists 88 D-Index: 24 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 25 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 27 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 23 scientists 96 D-Index: 12 scientists 97 D-Index: 14 scientists 98 D-Index: 19 scientists 99 D-Index: 16 scientists 100 D-Index: 14 scientists 101 D-Index: 5 scientists 102 D-Index: 21 scientists 103 D-Index: 16 scientists 104 D-Index: 10 scientists 105 D-Index: 7 scientists 106 D-Index: 7 scientists 107 D-Index: 7 scientists 108 D-Index: 6 scientists 109 D-Index: 9 scientists 110 D-Index: 11 scientists 111 D-Index: 12 scientists 112 D-Index: 9 scientists 113 D-Index: 7 scientists 114 D-Index: 3 scientists 115 D-Index: 8 scientists 116 D-Index: 5 scientists 117 D-Index: 11 scientists 118 D-Index: 4 scientists 119 D-Index: 2 scientists 120 D-Index: 5 scientists 121+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 121+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 5th percentile

5% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 121 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tomáš Vrška is affiliated with Mendel University Brno in the Czech Republic. Their research focuses primarily on forest ecology, biodiversity, and related fields within agricultural and biological sciences as well as environmental science.

The scientist's work covers several main topics, including:

  • Forest Ecology and Biodiversity Studies
  • Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
  • Lichen and fungal ecology
  • Forest Management and Policy
  • Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
  • Fire effects on ecosystems

Their main fields of study encompass:

  • Agricultural and Biological Sciences
  • Environmental Science

Subfields of interest include:

  • Insect Science
  • Global and Planetary Change
  • Plant Science
  • Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
  • Environmental Engineering

Tomáš Vrška has contributed to publications in various scientific journals. Frequent venues for their publications are:

  • Scientific Data
  • Diversity and Distributions
  • Journal of Fungi
  • Fungal Ecology
  • Forest Policy and Economics

Among the recent papers authored or co-authored by Tomáš Vrška are:

  • Protection gaps and restoration opportunities for primary forests in Europe (2020) in Diversity and Distributions
  • European primary forest database v2.0 (2021) in Scientific Data
  • Successional Development of Fungal Communities Associated with Decomposing Deadwood in a Natural Mixed Temperate Forest (2021) in Journal of Fungi
  • Successional development of wood-inhabiting fungi associated with dominant tree species in a natural temperate floodplain forest (2021) in Fungal Ecology
  • Motivations behind the forest managers' decision making about mixed forests in the Czech Republic (2022) in Forest Policy and Economics

They frequently collaborate with several co-authors, including:

  • Francesco María Sabatini
  • Sabina Burrascano
  • Inês Duarte
  • Matteo Garbarino
  • Nikolaos Grigoriadis

Best Publications

  • CTFS-ForestGEO: A worldwide network monitoring forests in an era of global change

    Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira;Stuart J. Davies;Stuart J. Davies;Amy C. Bennett;Erika B. Gonzalez-Akre

  • Dead wood in European beech (Fagus sylvatica) forest reserves

    Morten Christensen;Katrine Hahn;Edward P. Mountford;Péter Ódor

  • Global importance of large‐diameter trees

    James A. Lutz;Tucker J. Furniss;Daniel J. Johnson;Stuart J. Davies

  • BioTIME: A database of biodiversity time series for the Anthropocene

    Maria Dornelas;Laura H. Antão;Laura H. Antão;Faye Moyes;Amanda E. Bates;Amanda E. Bates

  • Where are Europe's last primary forests?

    Francesco Maria Sabatini;Sabina Burrascano;William S. Keeton;Christian Levers

  • Plant diversity increases with the strength of negative density dependence at the global scale.

    Joseph A. LaManna;Scott A. Mangan;Alfonso Alonso;Norman A. Bourg;Norman A. Bourg

  • 3D Forest: An application for descriptions of three-dimensional forest structures using terrestrial LiDAR.

    Jan Trochta;Martin Krůček;Tomáš Vrška;Kamil Král

  • ForestGEO: Understanding forest diversity and dynamics through a global observatory network

    Stuart J. Davies;Iveren Abiem;Kamariah Abu Salim;Salomón Aguilar

  • European beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) and silver fir (Abies alba Mill.) rotation in the Carpathians―A developmental cycle or a linear trend induced by man?

    Tomáš Vrška;Dušan Adam;Libor Hort;Tomáš Kolář

  • New Opportunities for Forest Remote Sensing Through Ultra-High-Density Drone Lidar

    James R. Kellner;John Armston;Markus Birrer;K. C. Cushman

  • Direct and indirect effects of climate on richness drive the latitudinal diversity gradient in forest trees

    Chengjin Chu;James A. Lutz;Kamil Král;Tomáš Vrška

  • Comparing close-to-naturesilviculture with processes in pristine forests: lessons from Central Europe

    Jean-Philippe Schütz;Milan Saniga;Jurij Diaci;Tomas Vrška

  • Local variability of stand structural features in beech dominated natural forests of Central Europe: Implications for sampling

    Kamil Král;David Janík;Tomáš Vrška;Dušan Adam

  • Developmental phases in a temperate natural spruce-fir-beech forest: determination by a supervised classification method

    Kamil Král;Tomáš Vrška;Libor Hort;Dušan Adam

  • Patch mosaic of developmental stages in central European natural forests along vegetation gradient

    Kamil Král;Sean M. McMahon;David Janík;Dušan Adam

  • Protection gaps and restoration opportunities for primary forests in Europe

    Francesco M. Sabatini;Francesco M. Sabatini;William S. Keeton;Marcus Lindner;Miroslav Svoboda

  • Soil variability through spatial scales in a permanently disturbed natural spruce-fir-beech forest

    Pavel Šamonil;Martin Valtera;Stanislav Bek;Barbora Šebková

  • European primary forest database v2.0.

    Francesco Maria Sabatini;Hendrik Bluhm;Zoltan Kun;Dmitry Aksenov

  • Tree spatial patterns of Fagus sylvatica expansion over 37 years

    David Janík;Kamil Král;Dusan Adam;Libor Hort

  • Spatial and volume patterns of an unmanaged submontane mixed forest in Central Europe: 160 years of spontaneous dynamics

    Barbora Šebková;Pavel Šamonil;David Janík;Dušan Adam

  • Natural gap dynamics in a Central European mixed beech—spruce—fir old-growth forest

    Kata Kenderes;Kamil Král;Tomáš Vrška;Tibor Standovár

  • Spatial variability of general stand characteristics in central European beech-dominated natural stands – Effects of scale

    Kamil Král;Martin Valtera;David Janík;Pavel Šamonil

  • Trends and cyclical changes in natural fir-beech Forests at the north-western edge of the Carpathians

    Pavel Šamonil;Tomáš Vrška

Frequent Co-Authors

Kamil Král
Kamil Král Silva Tarouca Research Institute for Landscape and Ornamental Gardening
Pavel Šamonil
Pavel Šamonil Czech University of Life Sciences Prague
David Kenfack
David Kenfack Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
Fangliang He
Fangliang He University of Alberta
Sean M. McMahon
Sean M. McMahon Smithsonian Environmental Research Center
Stephen P. Hubbell
Stephen P. Hubbell University of California, Los Angeles
Stuart J. Davies
Stuart J. Davies Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute
William J. McShea
William J. McShea Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute
Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira
Kristina J. Anderson-Teixeira Smithsonian Conservation Biology Institute
Geoffrey G. Parker
Geoffrey G. Parker Smithsonian Environmental Research Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Ecology and Evolution can open the door to a range of dynamic online degree options and career pathways in the United States. Many students interested in environmental science also pursue roles in advocacy, research, education, and counseling, and online programs now make this journey more accessible than ever.

Flexibility is a key benefit of these programs, especially for non-traditional students and those balancing work or family commitments. For example, service members or veterans can explore an online college for military for support tailored to their unique needs.

Those passionate about social impact frequently choose social work online master's programs to build a foundation in helping communities and individuals thrive, which is closely tied to ecological and mental well-being.

Ambitious learners may seek accelerated masters psychology programs to quickly advance into roles that analyze human interaction with the environment, while others may opt for a masters degree in counseling online to address the mental health aspects connected to ecological change.

These pathways offer flexible, reputable options for building meaningful careers that connect people, ecosystems, and communities.

Best Scientists Citing Tomáš Vrška

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles