World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
69
Citations
18268
World Ranking
7337
National Ranking
3362

John M. Lambert publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Lambert sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 157 publications — 30th percentile

30% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

John M. Lambert D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John M. Lambert sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE)

Overview

John M. Lambert is affiliated with ImmunoGen in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, primarily Medicine and Earth and Planetary Sciences. The scientist's work involves a range of subfields including Oncology, Anthropology, Space and Planetary Science, Cell Biology, and Ecology.

Their research topics focus on Archaeological Research and Protection, HER2/EGFR in Cancer Research, Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research, CAR-T Cell Therapy Research, Pleistocene-Era Hominins and Archaeology, Morphological Variations and Asymmetry, as well as Image Processing and 3D Reconstruction.

Frequent co-authors in their collaborations include Charles Dumontet, Janice M. Reichert, Peter D. Senter, Alain Beck, and Ashley M. Smallwood.

Notable publication venues where John M. Lambert has contributed include the Midcontinental Journal of Archaeology, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, American Antiquity, Journal of Archaeological Science Reports, and Neuromuscular Disorders.

Selected recent papers by the scientist include:

  • "Antibody-drug conjugates come of age in oncology," 2023, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery
  • "Using 3D Models to Understand the Changing Role of Fluting in Paleoindian Point Technology from Clovis to Dalton," 2022, American Antiquity
  • "A critical review of UAS-based aerial photography and photogrammetry of Cahokia's Grand Plaza," 2022, Journal of Archaeological Science Reports
  • "DMD - BIOMARKERS & OUTCOME MEASURES," 2020, Neuromuscular Disorders
  • "An Intracellular Calcium Signal Activates p70 but Not p90 Ribosomal S6 Kinase in Liver Epithelial Cells," 2021, UNC Libraries

John M. Lambert has been recognized as a Fellow of the Indian National Academy of Engineering (INAE) since 2016.

Best Publications

  • Targeting HER2-Positive Breast Cancer with Trastuzumab-DM1, an Antibody–Cytotoxic Drug Conjugate

    Gail D. Lewis Phillips;Guangmin Li;Debra L. Dugger;Lisa M. Crocker

  • Cytotoxic agents comprising maytansinoids and their therapeutic use

    Ravi J. Chari;Victor S. Goldmacher;John M. Lambert;Walter A. Blattler

  • Ado-trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1): An Antibody–Drug Conjugate (ADC) for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

    John M. Lambert;Ravi V. J. Chari

  • Humanization of murine monoclonal antibodies through variable domain resurfacing

    Michael A. Roguska;Jan T. Pedersen;Christine A. Keddy;Andrew H. Henry

  • Tiam1 mediates Ras activation of Rac by a PI(3)K-independent mechanism

    John M. Lambert;Que T. Lambert;Gary W. Reuther;Angeliki Malliri

  • Structural characterization of the maytansinoid–monoclonal antibody immunoconjugate, huN901–DM1, by mass spectrometry

    Lintao Wang;Godfrey Amphlett;Walter A. Blättler;John M. Lambert

  • ERADICATION OF LARGE COLON TUMOR XENOGRAFTS BY TARGETED DELIVERY OF MAYTANSINOIDS

    C. Liu;B. M. Tadayoni;L. A. Bourret;K. M. Mattocks

  • Drug-conjugated Monoclonal Antibodies for the Treatment of Cancer

    John M Lambert

  • New developments for antibody-drug conjugate-based therapeutic approaches

    Bart Ecg de Goeij;John M Lambert

  • Antibody-Drug Conjugates (ADCs) for Personalized Treatment of Solid Tumors: A Review.

    John M. Lambert;Charles Q. Morris

  • Acid-cleavable compound, use in protein conjugates and drug delivery systems

    Walter A. Blattler;John M. Lambert;Peter D. Senter

  • Antibody-Drug Conjugates for Cancer Treatment.

    John M Lambert;Anna Berkenblit

  • Cantuzumab Mertansine, a Maytansinoid Immunoconjugate Directed to the CanAg Antigen: A Phase I, Pharmacokinetic, and Biologic Correlative Study

    Anthony W. Tolcher;Leonel Ochoa;Lisa A. Hammond;Amita Patnaik

  • The site of action of six different ribosome-inactivating proteins from plants on eukaryotic ribosomes: the RNA N-glycosidase activity of the proteins.

    Yaeta Endo;Kunio Tsurugi;John M. Lambert

  • Addition of sulfhydryl groups to Escherichia coli ribosomes by protein modification with 2-iminothiolane (methyl 4-mercaptobutyrimidate).

    Rodney Jue;John M. Lambert;Leland R. Pierce;Robert R. Traut

  • Disulfide-linked antibody-maytansinoid conjugates: optimization of in vivo activity by varying the steric hindrance at carbon atoms adjacent to the disulfide linkage

    Brenda A. Kellogg;Lisa Garrett;Yelena Kovtun;Katharine C. Lai

  • Purified immunotoxins that are reactive with human lymphoid cells. Monoclonal antibodies conjugated to the ribosome-inactivating proteins gelonin and the pokeweed antiviral proteins.

    J M Lambert;P D Senter;A Yau-Young;W A Blättler

  • Serotherapy of B-cell neoplasms with anti-B4-blocked ricin: a phase I trial of daily bolus infusion

    ML Grossbard;AS Freedman;J Ritz;F Coral

  • Anti-B4-blocked ricin: a phase I trial of 7-day continuous infusion in patients with B-cell neoplasms.

    M L Grossbard;J M Lambert;V S Goldmacher;N L Spector

  • SAR3419: an anti-CD19-Maytansinoid Immunoconjugate for the treatment of B-cell malignancies.

    Veronique Blanc;Anne Bousseau;Anne Caron;Chantal Carrez

Frequent Co-Authors

Victor S. Goldmacher
Victor S. Goldmacher ImmunoGen (United States)
Stuart F. Schlossman
Stuart F. Schlossman Harvard University
Jerome Ritz
Jerome Ritz Harvard University
Peter D. Senter
Peter D. Senter Seattle Genetics (United States)
Norman L. Letvin
Norman L. Letvin Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
Lee M. Nadler
Lee M. Nadler Harvard University
Keith A. Reimann
Keith A. Reimann Harvard Medical School
Larry W. Kwak
Larry W. Kwak City Of Hope National Medical Center
Rosemary O'Connor
Rosemary O'Connor University College Cork
Corinne Haioun
Corinne Haioun Paris-Est Créteil University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Are you considering broadening your options beyond Biology and Biochemistry in the USA? There is a growing number of flexible online degrees offering diverse pathways in healthcare and science-related fields. For those interested in direct patient care, online nursing programs provide a convenient route to enter the nursing profession without putting your career on hold.

If you are passionate about food, health, and disease prevention, an online nutrition degree delivers foundational knowledge for impactful roles in dietetics, wellness, and public health. For those aiming toward healthcare leadership, cahme accredited online mha programs ensure high-quality training to pursue executive or managerial careers in healthcare systems.

Ambitious professionals seeking advanced clinical or academic positions can consider online dnp programs without clinicals. These programs focus on leadership, policy, or education aspects of nursing—ideal for those who may not require additional hands-on experience.

Best Scientists Citing John M. Lambert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles