World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
41
Citations
13389
World Ranking
7711
National Ranking
4131

Joseph C. Franklin publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph C. Franklin sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 89 publications — 13th percentile

13% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joseph C. Franklin D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph C. Franklin sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 33rd percentile

33% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joseph C. Franklin is affiliated with Florida State University in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of Psychology and Medicine, with a focus on Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry and Mental Health.

The scientist's work covers several notable topics, including:

  • Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
  • Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Psychedelics and Drug Studies
  • Mental Health Treatment and Access

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Joseph C. Franklin include:

  • Xieyining Huang
  • Jessica D. Ribeiro
  • Kensie M. Funsch
  • Mitchell J. Prinstein
  • Esther C. Park

Publications from Joseph C. Franklin have appeared in venues such as:

  • UNC Libraries
  • Scientific Reports
  • Psychological Bulletin
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology

Recent papers include:

  • Interventions for suicide and self-injury: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials across nearly 50 years of research., 2020, Psychological Bulletin
  • The Differences Between Individuals Engaging in Nonsuicidal Self-Injury and Suicide Attempt Are Complex (vs. Complicated or Simple), 2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • The differences between suicide ideators and suicide attempters: Simple, complicated, or complex?, 2020, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology
  • Brain Differences Associated with Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors: A Meta-Analysis of Neuroimaging Studies, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Longitudinal studies support the safety and ethics of virtual reality suicide as a research method, 2021, Scientific Reports

Best Publications

  • Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research.

    Joseph C. Franklin;Jessica D. Ribeiro;Kathryn R. Fox;Kate H. Bentley

  • Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors as risk factors for future suicide ideation, attempts, and death: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

    J. D. Ribeiro;J. C. Franklin;Kathryn Rebecca Fox;K. H. Bentley

  • Depression and hopelessness as risk factors for suicide ideation, attempts and death: Meta-analysis of longitudinal studies

    Jessica D. Ribeiro;Xieyining Huang;Kathryn R. Fox;Joseph C. Franklin

  • Predicting Risk of Suicide Attempts Over Time Through Machine Learning

    Colin G. Walsh;Jessica D. Ribeiro;Joseph C. Franklin

  • Meta-analysis of risk factors for nonsuicidal self-injury

    Kathryn Rebecca Fox;Joseph C. Franklin;Jessica D. Ribeiro;Evan M. Kleiman

  • Anxiety and its disorders as risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analytic review

    Kate H. Bentley;Joseph C. Franklin;Jessica D. Ribeiro;Evan M. Kleiman

  • Why Do People Hurt Themselves? A New Conceptual Model of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury:

    Jill M. Hooley;Joseph C. Franklin

  • Evidence-based psychosocial treatments for self-injurious thoughts and behaviors in youth.

    Catherine R. Glenn;Joseph C. Franklin;Matthew K. Nock

  • Peer influence and nonsuicidal self injury: longitudinal results in community and clinically-referred adolescent samples.

    Mitchell J. Prinstein;Nicole Heilbron;John D. Guerry;Joseph C. Franklin

  • Interventions for suicide and self-injury: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials across nearly 50 years of research.

    Kathryn R. Fox;Xieyining Huang;Eleonora M. Guzmán;Kensie M. Funsch

  • Predicting suicide attempts in adolescents with longitudinal clinical data and machine learning.

    Colin G. Walsh;Jessica D. Ribeiro;Joseph C. Franklin

  • A brief mobile app reduces nonsuicidal and suicidal self-injury: Evidence from three randomized controlled trials.

    Joseph C. Franklin;Kathryn R. Fox;Christopher R. Franklin;Evan M. Kleiman

  • Emotional cascades and self-injury: investigating instability of rumination and negative emotion.

    Edward A. Selby;Joe Franklin;Amanda Carson-Wong;Shireen L. Rizvi

  • The Functions of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: Support for Cognitive-Affective Regulation and Opponent Processes From a Novel Psychophysiological Paradigm

    Joseph C. Franklin;Elenda Tobi Hessel;Rachel V. Aaron;Michael S. Arthur

  • Clarifying the role of pain tolerance in suicidal capability

    Joseph Chad Franklin;Elenda Tobi Hessel;Mitchell Jay Prinstein

  • Nonsuicidal self-injury and diminished pain perception: the role of emotion dysregulation

    Joseph C. Franklin;Rachel V. Aaron;Michael S. Arthur;S. Paul Shorkey

  • Chronic Pain and Suicide: Understanding the Association

    Jill M. Hooley;Joseph C. Franklin;Matthew K. Nock

  • Significant shared heritability underlies suicide attempt and clinically predicted probability of attempting suicide

    Douglas M. Ruderfer;Colin G. Walsh;Matthew W. Aguirre;Yosuke Tanigawa

  • Understanding suicide risk within the Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework: A meta‐analytic review

    Catherine R. Glenn;Evan M. Kleiman;Christine B. Cha;Charlene A. Deming

  • Feeling Worse to Feel Better Pain-Offset Relief Simultaneously Stimulates Positive Affect and Reduces Negative Affect

    Joseph C. Franklin;Kent M. Lee;Eleanor K. Hanna;Mitchell J. Prinstein

Frequent Co-Authors

Jessica D. Ribeiro
Jessica D. Ribeiro Florida State University
Matthew K. Nock
Matthew K. Nock Harvard University
Kathryn R. Fox
Kathryn R. Fox University of Denver
Mitchell J. Prinstein
Mitchell J. Prinstein University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Evan M. Kleiman
Evan M. Kleiman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Jill M. Hooley
Jill M. Hooley Harvard University
Terry D. Blumenthal
Terry D. Blumenthal Wake Forest University
Catherine R. Glenn
Catherine R. Glenn Old Dominion University
Manuel A. Rivas
Manuel A. Rivas Stanford University
Douglas M. Ruderfer
Douglas M. Ruderfer Vanderbilt University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA can open doors to varied career pathways, including allied fields like speech-language pathology. Many students with a psychology background choose to pursue this rewarding profession, as it combines communication science, counseling, and therapeutic skills.

Each state has unique licensing and educational requirements for speech-language pathologists (SLPs). For example, to understand how to become a speech language pathologist in Maine, candidates must complete graduate coursework and supervised clinical hours. Meanwhile, the Maryland speech pathologist certification requirements include state-specific examinations and continuing education. Those interested in New England can learn about how to become a speech language pathologist in Massachusetts, where local certification and fieldwork stipulations apply.

In Michigan, pathways are detailed on SLP professional boards, outlining slp requirements in Michigan such as accredited degrees and license renewals. Pursuing online degrees in psychology or related disciplines can help fulfill these prerequisites, offering students flexibility while preparing for meaningful careers in healthcare, education, and beyond.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph C. Franklin

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles