World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
J. A. M. Van Gisbergen

J. A. M. Van Gisbergen

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
38
Citations
6137
World Ranking
8543
National Ranking
226

J. A. M. Van Gisbergen publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. A. M. Van Gisbergen sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 70 publications — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

J. A. M. Van Gisbergen D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where J. A. M. Van Gisbergen sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

J. A. M. Van Gisbergen is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands. Their academic profile does not list specific recent papers, co-authors, or frequent publication venues at this time, which limits detailed insights into particular research outputs or collaborative networks.

There is no information available regarding specific fields or subfields of study connected to their work, nor are there listed main topics that the scientist has focused on. Similarly, no book publications or awards have been recorded.

Due to the limited publicly available data on publications, projects, and academic contributions, an in-depth overview of their research expertise and thematic interests cannot be established from the current data set.

Best Publications

  • A quantitative analysis of generation of saccadic eye movements by burst neurons.

    J. A.M. Van Gisbergen;D. A. Robinson;S. Gielen

  • Collicular ensemble coding of saccades based on vector summation

    J.A.M. Van Gisbergen;A.J. Van Opstal;A.A.M. Tax

  • A parametric analysis of human saccades in different experimental paradigms.

    A.C. Smit;J.A.M. Van Gisbergen;A.R. Cools

  • Coordination of fast eye and arm movements in a tracking task.

    C. C. A. M. Gielen;P. J. M. van den Heuvel;J. A. M. van Gisbergen

  • Scatter in the metrics of saccades and properties of the collicular motor map.

    A.J. van Opstal;J.A.M. van Gisbergen

  • Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates.

    A. D. Van Beuzekom;J.A.M. Van Gisbergen

  • Remapping of neural activity in the motor colliculus: a neural network study.

    K.P. Krommenhoek;A.J. Van Opstal;C.C.A.M. Gielen;J.A.M. Van Gisbergen

  • Skewness of saccadic velocity profiles: a unifying parameter for normal and slow saccades

    A.J. Van Opstal;J.A.M. Van Gisbergen

  • Multisensory Processing in Spatial Orientation: An Inverse Probabilistic Approach

    I.A.H. Clemens;M. de Vrijer;L.P.J. Selen;J.A.M. van Gisbergen

  • A short-latency transition in saccade dynamics during square-wave tracking and its significance for the differentiation of visually-guided and predictive saccades.

    A. C. Smit;J. A. M. Van Gisbergen

  • The Double Magnetic Induction Method for Measuring Eye Movement - Results in Monkey and Man

    Lo J. Bour;Jan A. M. Van Gisbergen;Jan Bruijns;Fenno P. Ottes

  • Experimental test of two models for the generation of oblique saccades

    J. A. M. van Gisbergen;A. J. van Opstal;J. J. M. Schoenmakers

  • Collicular involvement in a saccadic colour discrimination task

    F. P. Ottes;J. A. M. Van Gisbergen;J. J. Eggermont

  • Role of monkey superior colliculus in saccade averaging.

    A. J. van Opstal;J. A. M. van Gisbergen

  • Comparison of saccades evoked by visual stimulation and collicular electrical stimulation in the alert monkey.

    A. J. Van Opstal;J. A. M. Van Gisbergen;A. C. Smit

  • Three-dimensional analysis of strongly curved saccades elicited by double-step stimuli

    A. W. H. Minken;A. J. Van Opstal;J. A. M. Van Gisbergen

  • Shared computational mechanism for tilt compensation accounts for biased verticality percepts in motion and pattern vision.

    M. De Vrijer;W. P. Medendorp;J.A.M. Van Gisbergen

  • Accuracy-precision trade-off in visual orientation constancy.

    M. De Vrijer;W. P. Medendorp;J. A. M. Van Gisbergen

  • Fusion of Visual and Vestibular Tilt Cues in the Perception of Visual Vertical

    R. A. A. Vingerhoets;M. De Vrijer;J. A. M. Van Gisbergen;W. P. Medendorp

  • An analysis of curvature in fast and slow human saccades.

    A. C. Smit;J. A. M. Van Gisbergen

  • A nonlinear model for collicular spatial interactions underlying the metrical properties of electrically elicited saccades.

    Unknown

Frequent Co-Authors

A. J. Van Opstal
A. J. Van Opstal Radboud University
Jos J. Eggermont
Jos J. Eggermont University of Calgary
Trevor J. Crawford
Trevor J. Crawford Lancaster University
Christopher Kennard
Christopher Kennard University of Oxford
Jonathan D. Victor
Jonathan D. Victor Cornell University
Dominik Straumann
Dominik Straumann University of Zurich
W. Pieter Medendorp
W. Pieter Medendorp Radboud University
Denise Y. P. Henriques
Denise Y. P. Henriques York University
Philippe Lefèvre
Philippe Lefèvre Université Catholique de Louvain

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens up a variety of educational and professional options. Many students choose to pursue their degree through accelerated bachelor degree programs, which allow you to earn your credentials more quickly and start your career sooner. These fast-track options are particularly valuable for motivated individuals seeking to join the workforce or advance in their field as efficiently as possible.

When considering your pathway, it's helpful to look at the top degrees in the world and how they align with your interests and career goals. Neuroscience is not only intellectually rewarding but also offers potential for high earning power, especially when combined with related majors.

For those who value both passion and financial prospects, there are fun majors in college that pay well. Interdisciplinary options, such as combining neuroscience with computer science or psychology, can enhance job opportunities in evolving industries like AI and healthcare technology.

If cost is a concern, many students search for the cheapest online colleges that accept fafsa. These institutions can make a neuroscience or allied degree much more affordable, helping you minimize debt while maximizing future earning potential.

Best Scientists Citing J. A. M. Van Gisbergen

Trending Scientists