World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 56 1916 1732 76 72 386 10403

Guy Widdershoven publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Guy Widdershoven between 1989 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Guy Widdershoven published across 37 years, from 1989 to 2025, averaging 12 papers a year. Output peaked at 31 publications in 2009. 11 of the 444 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1989 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 31. Peak 31 publications in 2009. 1989: 1 publication 1990: 1 publication 1991: 1 publication 1992: 1 publication 1993: 1 publication 1994: 1 publication 1995: 2 publications 1996: 4 publications 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 3 publications 2000: 5 publications 2001: 8 publications 2002: 6 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 7 publications 2005: 15 publications 2006: 8 publications 2007: 9 publications 2008: 19 publications 2009: 31 publications 2010: 21 publications 2011: 24 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 25 publications 2015: 25 publications 2016: 21 publications 2017: 31 publications 2018: 9 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 27 publications 2021: 28 publications 2022: 16 publications 2023: 9 publications 2024: 7 publications 2025: 4 publications
1989 2025

444 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Guy Widdershoven: publications per year, 1989 to 2025
Year Publications
1989 1
1990 1
1991 1
1992 1
1993 1
1994 1
1995 2
1996 4
1997 1
1998 1
1999 3
2000 5
2001 8
2002 6
2003 4
2004 7
2005 15
2006 8
2007 9
2008 19
2009 31
2010 21
2011 24
2012 19
2013 22
2014 25
2015 25
2016 21
2017 31
2018 9
2019 27
2020 27
2021 28
2022 16
2023 9
2024 7
2025 4
Total 444
Download as CSV

Guy Widdershoven publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy Widdershoven sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 384–393 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 386 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44 386
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Guy Widdershoven D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Guy Widdershoven sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 56 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 56 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109 56
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Guy Widdershoven is affiliated with the University of Amsterdam in the Netherlands. Their research spans several fields, primarily in medicine, health professions, and psychology. Widdershoven's work integrates subfields including public health, environmental and occupational health, clinical psychology, general health professions, health informatics, and philosophy.

The research topics they have extensively addressed cover a range of issues related to healthcare and ethics. Key areas of focus include palliative care and end-of-life issues, ethics in medical practice, patient dignity and privacy, healthcare decision-making and restraints, ethics in clinical research, artificial intelligence in healthcare and education, and grief, bereavement, and mental health.

Widdershoven has contributed to multiple publications, with selected notable papers including:

  • Fostering a just culture in healthcare organizations: experiences in practice (2022), BMC Health Services Research
  • Irremediable Psychiatric Suffering in the Context of Physician-assisted Death: A Scoping Review of Arguments: La souffrance psychiatrique irrémédiable dans le contexte du suicide assisté: Une revue étendue des arguments (2020), The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry
  • The Active Recovery Triad Model: A New Approach in Dutch Long-Term Mental Health Care (2020), Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • CURA: A clinical ethics support instrument for caregivers in palliative care (2022), Nursing Ethics
  • Establishing irremediable psychiatric suffering in the context of medical assistance in dying in the Netherlands: a qualitative study (2022), Canadian Medical Association Journal

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Widdershoven include Natalie Evans, Laura Hartman, Sisco van Veen, H. Roeline W. Pasman, and Ana Marušić. These collaborations have contributed to a substantial body of joint work.

Widdershoven's research outputs are published in various venues. The most frequent among these include:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • The American Journal of Bioethics
  • BMC Health Services Research
  • The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry

Best Publications

  • What does quality of life mean to older adults? A thematic synthesis.

    Karen M. van Leeuwen;Miriam S. van Loon;Fenna A. van Nes;Judith E. Bosmans

  • Patients as Partners in Responsive Research: Methodological Notions for Collaborations in Mixed Research Teams

    Tineke A. Abma;Christi J. Nierse;Guy A. M. Widdershoven

  • Vulnerability of family caregivers in terminal palliative care at home; balancing between burden and capacity.

    Unknown

  • Clinical effectiveness of online computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy without support for depression in primary care: randomised trial.

    L.E. de Graaf;S.A.H. Gerhards;A.R. Arntz;H. Riper

  • Congruence between patients' preferred and perceived participation in medical decision-making: a review of the literature

    Linda Brom;Wendy Hopmans;H Roeline W Pasman;Danielle R M Timmermans

  • Empirical ethics as dialogical practice.

    Guy Widdershoven;Tineke Abma;Bert Molewijk

  • Economic evaluation of online computerised cognitive-behavioural therapy without support for depression in primary care: randomised trial.

    S.A.H. Gerhards;L.E. de Graaf;L.E. Jacobs;J.L. Severens

  • What does quality of life mean to older frail and non-frail community-dwelling adults in the Netherlands?

    M. T. E. Puts;N. Shekary;G. Widdershoven;J. Heldens

  • Improving adherence and effectiveness of computerised cognitive behavioural therapy without support for depression: a qualitative study on patient experiences.

    S.A.H. Gerhards;T.A. Abma;A. Arntz;L.E. de Graaf;L.E. de Graaf

  • Good Care in Ongoing Dialogue. Improving the Quality of Care Through Moral Deliberation and Responsive Evaluation

    Tineke A. Abma;Tineke A. Abma;Bert Molewijk;Bert Molewijk;Guy A. M. Widdershoven;Guy A. M. Widdershoven

  • What is a good death? Terminally ill patients dealing with normative expectations around death and dying.

    Minke Goldsteen;Rob Houtepen;Ireen M. Proot;Huda Huijer Abu-Saad

  • Patients' preferences for participation in treatment decision-making at the end of life: qualitative interviews with advanced cancer patients.

    Linda Brom;H. Roeline W. Pasman;Guy A. M. Widdershoven;Maurice J. D. L. van der Vorst

  • Implementing moral case deliberation in a psychiatric hospital: process and outcome

    Unknown

  • Bringing gender sensitivity into healthcare practice: a systematic review.

    Halime Celik;Toine A.L.M. Lagro-Janssen;Guy G.A.M. Widdershoven;Tineke A. Abma

  • Challenges in shared decision making in advanced cancer care: a qualitative longitudinal observational and interview study.

    Linda Brom;Janine C. De Snoo-Trimp;Bregje D. Onwuteaka-Philipsen;Guy A. M. Widdershoven

  • Quality of life in palliative care cancer patients : a literature review

    Hubert R. Jocham;Theo Dassen;Guy Widdershoven;Ruud Halfens

  • Aims and harvest of moral case deliberation

    Unknown

  • The needs of terminally ill patients at home: directing one's life, health and things related to beloved others

    Ireen M. Proot;Huda Huijer Abu-Saad;Ruud H.J. ter Meulen;Minke Goldsteen

  • Learning by Doing. Training Health Care Professionals to Become Facilitator of Moral Case Deliberation

    Unknown

  • The Role of Emotions in Moral Case Deliberation: Theory, Practice, and Methodology

    Unknown

  • Good care in group home living for people with dementia. Experiences of residents, family and nursing staff

    Ezra van Zadelhoff;Hilde Verbeek;Guy Widdershoven;Erik van Rossum

  • Integrated empirical ethics: loss of normativity?

    Lieke van der Scheer;Guy Widdershoven

  • Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures

    W.A. Janssen;R.R.W. van de Sande;E.O. Noorthoorn;H.L.I. Nijman

  • The use of seclusion in the Netherlands compared to countries in and outside Europe.

    Wim A. Janssen;E.O. Noorthoorn;W.J. de Vries;G.J.M. Hutschemeakers

  • Outcomes of Moral Case Deliberation - the development of an evaluation instrument for clinical ethics support (the Euro-MCD)

    Mia Svantesson;Jan Karlsson;Pierre Boitte;Jan Schildman

Frequent Co-Authors

Tineke A. Abma
Tineke A. Abma Leiden University
Henk Nijman
Henk Nijman Radboud University
Marcus J.H. Huibers
Marcus J.H. Huibers Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Arnoud Arntz
Arnoud Arntz University of Amsterdam
Joost Dekker
Joost Dekker University of Amsterdam
Johan L. Severens
Johan L. Severens Erasmus University Rotterdam
Martijn Huisman
Martijn Huisman Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Heleen Riper
Heleen Riper Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Ruud J.G. Halfens
Ruud J.G. Halfens Maastricht University
Dorly J. H. Deeg
Dorly J. H. Deeg University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in Social Sciences and Humanities opens a world of flexible learning and career potential. Many students look for the cheapest online msw programs to begin or advance their careers in social work. Affordability and accessibility are major considerations for those who want a high-quality education without overwhelming financial burdens.

Another popular path for aspiring behavioral analysts is earning bcba certification online cost effectively, helping students balance career advancement while managing expenses. For those seeking a fast track, options like a 1 year online master's in social work can accelerate entry into impactful roles.

Psychology degrees are also in demand, with the possibility of earning a 2 year psychology degree online for those eager to enter the workforce sooner. Each pathway offers unique career opportunities in counseling, human services, education, and research fields. Choosing the right program involves balancing cost, speed, accreditation, and long-term career goals.

Best Scientists Citing Guy Widdershoven

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles