World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Tilman Steinert

Tilman Steinert

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
41
Citations
5993
World Ranking
5116
National Ranking
139

Tilman Steinert publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tilman Steinert sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 337 publications — 92nd percentile

92% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Tilman Steinert D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Tilman Steinert sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Tilman Steinert is affiliated with the University of Ulm in Germany and has an extensive publication record primarily in the field of psychology. Their research spans multiple subfields, notably clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, philosophy, social psychology, and sociology and political science.

Their work touches on several key topics within these disciplines, including:

  • Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Healthcare decision-making and restraints
  • Psychopathy, forensic psychiatry, sexual offending
  • Mental health and psychiatry
  • Mental health treatment and access
  • Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Criminal law and policy

Steinert has contributed to numerous publications in well-known academic venues. The most frequent publication sources for their work include:

  • Psychiatrische Praxis
  • Der Nervenarzt
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • PLoS ONE
  • The Lancet Regional Health - Europe

Notable papers authored or co-authored by Steinert cover a range of issues related to psychiatry and mental health. Selected recent publications are:

  • "Freedom Restrictive Coercive Measures in Forensic Psychiatry," 2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • "History of Childhood Trauma and Association With Borderline and Dissociative Features," 2020, The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
  • "Victimization of People With Severe Mental Illness Outside and Within the Mental Health Care System: Results on Prevalence and Risk Factors From a Multicenter Study," 2020, Frontiers in Psychiatry
  • "Increase in coercive measures in psychiatric hospitals in Germany during the COVID-19 pandemic," 2022, PLoS ONE
  • "Incidents of aggression in German psychiatric hospitals: Is there an increase?," 2021, PLoS ONE

Collaborative efforts have featured several frequent co-authors, indicating a network of ongoing research partnerships. These collaborators include:

  • Erich Flammer
  • Sophie Hirsch
  • Dorothea Sauter
  • Andreas Bechdolf
  • Lieselotte Mahler

Best Publications

  • Incidence of seclusion and restraint in psychiatric hospitals: a literature review and survey of international trends

    Tilman Steinert;Peter Lepping;Renate Bernhardsgrütter;Andreas Conca

  • Prediction of inpatient violence

    T Steinert

  • Aggressive Behavior Against Self and Others Among First-Admission Patients With Schizophrenia

    Tilman Steinert;Christian Wiebe;Ralf Peter Gebhardt

  • Legal provisions and practice in the management of violent patients. a case vignette study in 16 European countries.

    Tilman Steinert;Peter Lepping

  • Measurement of violence during in-patient treatment and association with psychopathology.

    T Steinert;M Wölfle;R P Gebhardt

  • Diagnosis-related frequency of compulsory measures in 10 German psychiatric hospitals and correlates with hospital characteristics

    Tilman Steinert;Veronika Martin;Manfred Baur;Ulrich Bohnet

  • Subjective Distress After Seclusion or Mechanical Restraint: One-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Study

    Tilman Steinert;Michael Birk;Erich Flammer;Jan Bergk

  • Physical Harm and Death in the Context of Coercive Measures in Psychiatric Patients: A Systematic Review.

    Xenia A. K. Kersting;Sophie Hirsch;Tilman Steinert

  • The use of mechanical restraint and seclusion in patients with schizophrenia: A comparison of the practice in Germany and Switzerland

    Veronika Martin;Renate Bernhardsgrütter;Rita Goebel;Tilman Steinert

  • A randomized controlled comparison of seclusion and mechanical restraint in inpatient settings.

    Jan Bergk;Beate Einsiedler;Erich Flammer;Tilman Steinert

  • Seclusion and restraint in patients with schizophrenia: Clinical and biographical correlates.

    Tilman Steinert;Gabriele Bergbauer;Peter Schmid;Ralf Peter Gebhardt

  • "Coercion Experience Scale" (CES) - validation of a questionnaire on coercive measures

    Jan Bergk;Erich Flammer;Tilman Steinert

  • The use of coercive interventions in mental health care in Germany and the Netherlands. A comparison of the developments in two neighboring countries.

    Tilman Steinert;Eric O. Noorthoorn;Cornelis L. Mulder

  • Prevalence of mental disorders among sexual offenders in forensic psychiatry and prison.

    Silke Harsch;Julia Emma Bergk;Tilman Steinert;Ferdinand Keller

  • Methodological issues in monitoring the use of coercive measures

    W.A. Janssen;R.R.W. van de Sande;E.O. Noorthoorn;H.L.I. Nijman

  • Attitudes of mental health professionals and lay-people towards involuntary admission and treatment in England and Germany—a questionnaire analysis

    Peter Lepping;Tilman Steinert;Ralf-Peter Gebhardt;Hanns Rüdiger Röttgers

  • Similarities and differences in borderline personality disorder and schizophrenia with voice hearing.

    Stefan Tschoeke;Tilman Steinert;Erich Flammer;Carmen Uhlmann

  • One-year incidence and prevalence of seclusion: Dutch findings in an international perspective

    Eric Noorthoorn;Peter Lepping;Wim Janssen;Adriaan Hoogendoorn

  • Effects of polypharmacy on outcome in patients with schizophrenia in routine psychiatric treatment

    G. Längle;T. Steinert;P. Weiser;W. Schepp

  • Measures to Avoid Coercion in Psychiatry and Their Efficacy.

    Sophie Hirsch;Tilman Steinert

  • SubjectiveDistressAfterSeclusionor MechanicalRestraint:One-YearFollow-Up ofaRandomizedControlledStudy

    Tilman Steinert;Michael Birk;Jan Bergk

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas Becker
Thomas Becker Curtin University
Franz Petermann
Franz Petermann University of Bremen
Silvia Schneider
Silvia Schneider Ruhr University Bochum
Winfried Rief
Winfried Rief Philipp University of Marburg
Jürgen Margraf
Jürgen Margraf Ruhr University Bochum
Johannes Michalak
Johannes Michalak Witten/Herdecke University
Ulrich Stephani
Ulrich Stephani Kiel University
Michael Siniatchkin
Michael Siniatchkin Kiel University
Wolfgang Gaebel
Wolfgang Gaebel Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
Richard Whittington
Richard Whittington Norwegian University of Science and Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Social Sciences or Humanities degree in the USA offers a variety of flexible, online options tailored to different needs. From accelerated completion to affordability, students have several pathways to match their academic and career ambitions.

Online bachelor degree programs allow you to earn your degree at your own pace, making it easier to balance work and study. For those seeking advanced credentials, an online master's degree can often be completed in as little as one year—perfect for fast-tracking your career in education, psychology, or related fields.

Cost is also a major concern for many students. If you are considering a career in social work, cheap online msw programs provide quality education without a heavy financial burden. For those interested in behavioral analysis, bcba masters programs online offer a pathway to becoming a Board Certified Behavior Analyst.

Whether your goal is to enter the workforce sooner, keep costs manageable, or pursue specialized licensure, these online degree options open doors to rewarding roles in Social Sciences and Humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Tilman Steinert

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles