World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 37 9015 8420 4781 4351 158 11736

Kate H. Bentley publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Kate H. Bentley between 2011 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Kate H. Bentley published across 15 years, from 2011 to 2025, averaging 11.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 48 publications in 2017. 30 of the 178 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2011 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 48. Peak 48 publications in 2017. 2011: 3 publications 2012: 3 publications 2013: 2 publications 2014: 6 publications 2015: 7 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 48 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 14 publications 2020: 9 publications 2021: 24 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 16 publications 2025: 14 publications
2011 2025

178 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Kate H. Bentley: publications per year, 2011 to 2025
Year Publications
2011 3
2012 3
2013 2
2014 6
2015 7
2016 6
2017 48
2018 3
2019 14
2020 9
2021 24
2022 8
2023 15
2024 16
2025 14
Total 178
Download as CSV

Kate H. Bentley publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate H. Bentley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 151–160 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 158 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644
141–150 597
151–160 576 158
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Kate H. Bentley D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Kate H. Bentley sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 37
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Kate H. Bentley is affiliated with Massachusetts General Hospital in the United States. Their research primarily spans the fields of psychology and medicine, with a particular focus on clinical psychology, experimental and cognitive psychology, applied psychology, social psychology, and psychiatry and mental health.

The scientist's work addresses a range of mental health topics. Major themes include mental health research topics, suicide and self-harm studies, digital mental health interventions, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, mental health treatment and access, anxiety, depression, psychometrics, cognitive processes, and psychosomatic disorders and their treatments.

Bentley's recent notable papers include:

  • "Automated assessment of psychiatric disorders using speech: A systematic review" (2020) published in Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology
  • "Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions for Suicide Prevention: Promise, Challenges, and Future Directions" (2022) published in Psychiatry
  • "A Pilot Study Using Frequent Inpatient Assessments of Suicidal Thinking to Predict Short-Term Postdischarge Suicidal Behavior" (2021) published in JAMA Network Open
  • "Ethical dilemmas posed by mobile health and machine learning in psychiatry research" (2020) published in Bulletin of the World Health Organization
  • "Consensus Statement on Ethical & Safety Practices for Conducting Digital Monitoring Studies with People at Risk of Suicide and Related Behaviors" (2020) published in Psychiatric Research and Clinical Practice

Their work is often published in prominent journals, with repeated contributions to venues such as Behavior Therapy, JMIR Mental Health, Journal of Psychopathology and Clinical Science, Lung Cancer, and Journal of Affective Disorders.

Frequent collaborators include Evan M. Kleiman (26 coauthored works), Matthew K. Nock (24), Rebecca G. Fortgang (15), Alexander J. Millner (12), and Daniel D.L. Coppersmith (10).

K. H. Bentley has also authored book publications through Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra eBooks. These include two manuals published in 2023 related to transdiagnostic treatment protocols for emotional disorders:

  • Protocolo Unificado para o Tratamento Transdiagnóstico das Perturbações Emocionais: Manual de Exercícios
  • Protocolo Unificado para o Tratamento Transdiagnóstico das Perturbações Emocionais: Manual do Terapeuta

Best Publications

  • Risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analysis of 50 years of research.

    Joseph C. Franklin;Jessica D. Ribeiro;Kathryn R. Fox;Kate H. Bentley

  • Self-injurious thoughts and behaviors as risk factors for future suicide ideation, attempts, and death: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies.

    J. D. Ribeiro;J. C. Franklin;Kathryn Rebecca Fox;K. H. Bentley

  • The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders Compared With Diagnosis-Specific Protocols for Anxiety Disorders: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    David H. Barlow;Todd J. Farchione;Jacqueline R. Bullis;Jacqueline R. Bullis;Matthew W. Gallagher;Matthew W. Gallagher

  • Meta-analysis of risk factors for nonsuicidal self-injury

    Kathryn Rebecca Fox;Joseph C. Franklin;Jessica D. Ribeiro;Evan M. Kleiman

  • Anxiety and its disorders as risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors: A meta-analytic review

    Kate H. Bentley;Joseph C. Franklin;Jessica D. Ribeiro;Evan M. Kleiman

  • Automated assessment of psychiatric disorders using speech: A systematic review.

    Daniel M. Low;Daniel M. Low;Kate H. Bentley;Kate H. Bentley;Satrajit S. Ghosh;Satrajit S. Ghosh

  • Development and validation of the Overall Depression Severity and Impairment Scale.

    Kate H. Bentley;Matthew W. Gallagher;Jenna R. Carl;David H. Barlow

  • The association between nonsuicidal self-injury and the emotional disorders: A meta-analytic review

    Kate H. Bentley;Clair F. Cassiello-Robbins;Lisa Vittorio;Shannon Sauer-Zavala

  • Perceived Control and Vulnerability to Anxiety Disorders: A Meta-analytic Review

    Matthew W. Gallagher;Matthew W. Gallagher;Kate H. Bentley;David H. Barlow

  • The Four-Function Model of Nonsuicidal Self-Injury: Key Directions for Future Research

    Kate H. Bentley;Matthew K. Nock;David H. Barlow

  • The role of negative affectivity and negative reactivity to emotions in predicting outcomes in the unified protocol for the transdiagnostic treatment of emotional disorders.

    Shannon Sauer-Zavala;James F. Boswell;Matthew W. Gallagher;Kate H. Bentley

  • The Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders Preliminary Exploration of Effectiveness for Group Delivery

    Jacqueline R. Bullis;Shannon Sauer-Zavala;Kate H. Bentley;Johanna Thompson-Hollands

  • Repeat-dose ketamine augmentation for treatment-resistant depression with chronic suicidal ideation: A randomized, double blind, placebo controlled trial.

    Dawn F. Ionescu;Kate H. Bentley;Matthias Eikermann;Norman Taylor

  • TRANSDIAGNOSTIC TREATMENT OF BORDERLINE PERSONALITY DISORDER AND COMORBID DISORDERS: A CLINICAL REPLICATION SERIES

    Shannon Sauer-Zavala;Kate H. Bentley;Julianne G. Wilner

  • Biological risk factors for suicidal behaviors: a meta-analysis

    B P Chang;J C Franklin;J D Ribeiro;J D Ribeiro;K R Fox

  • Antidepressants for Major Depressive Disorder and Dysthymic Disorder in Patients With Comorbid Alcohol Use Disorders: A Meta-Analysis of Placebo-Controlled Randomized Trials

    Nadia Iovieno;Enrico Tedeschini;Kate H. Bentley;A. Eden Evins

  • Unified Protocol for Transdiagnostic Treatment of Emotional Disorders

    Unknown

  • A preliminary investigation of the effects of the unified protocol on temperament.

    Jenna R. Carl;Matthew W. Gallagher;Shannon E. Sauer-Zavala;Kate H. Bentley

  • Real-time monitoring technology in single-case experimental design research: Opportunities and challenges.

    Kate H. Bentley;Evan M. Kleiman;Grace Elliott;Jeffery C. Huffman

  • A Pilot Study Using Frequent Inpatient Assessments of Suicidal Thinking to Predict Short-Term Postdischarge Suicidal Behavior.

    Shirley B Wang;Daniel D L Coppersmith;Evan M Kleiman;Kate H Bentley

  • Just-in-Time Adaptive Interventions for Suicide Prevention: Promise, Challenges, and Future Directions

    Coppersmith Dd;Dempsey W;Kleiman E;Bentley K

Frequent Co-Authors

Shannon Sauer-Zavala
Shannon Sauer-Zavala University of Kentucky
Todd J. Farchione
Todd J. Farchione Boston University
Matthew K. Nock
Matthew K. Nock Harvard University
Evan M. Kleiman
Evan M. Kleiman Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
David H. Barlow
David H. Barlow Boston University
Alexander J. Millner
Alexander J. Millner Harvard University
Jessica D. Ribeiro
Jessica D. Ribeiro Florida State University
Paola Pedrelli
Paola Pedrelli Massachusetts General Hospital
Jeff C. Huffman
Jeff C. Huffman Harvard University
Joseph C. Franklin
Joseph C. Franklin Florida State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying psychology in the USA opens doors to a wide variety of related online degrees and meaningful career pathways. One highly relevant field is social work, which combines psychological principles with practical support for individuals and communities. Many students consider online social work programs as a flexible and affordable stepping stone to a rewarding career.

If you are interested in cost-effective educational options, there are several standout choices, such as the cheapest social work degrees in California. For those living in the Midwest, the cheapest social work programs in Chicago and cheapest social work programs in Columbus provide strong alternatives. In Texas, you can also find affordable social work degrees in Denton.

These affordable programs are ideal for students aiming to blend psychology with real-world impact. Graduates often go on to work as counselors, mental health advocates, or community support specialists, helping to make a difference in diverse settings across the country.

Best Scientists Citing Kate H. Bentley

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles