World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Political Science 29 1281 1160 641 559 125 3814

Scott Gehlbach publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Scott Gehlbach between 1997 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Scott Gehlbach published across 29 years, from 1997 to 2025, averaging 8.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 99 publications in 2020. 10 of the 246 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60 80
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1997 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 99. Peak 99 publications in 2020. 1997: 2 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 1 publication 2002: 2 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 17 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 11 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 11 publications 2018: 4 publications 2019: 4 publications 2020: 99 publications 2021: 16 publications 2022: 5 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 8 publications
1997 2025

246 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Scott Gehlbach: publications per year, 1997 to 2025
Year Publications
1997 2
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 1
2002 2
2003 5
2004 3
2005 1
2006 4
2007 4
2008 9
2009 6
2010 17
2011 6
2012 2
2013 11
2014 7
2015 6
2016 5
2017 11
2018 4
2019 4
2020 99
2021 16
2022 5
2023 5
2024 2
2025 8
Total 246
Download as CSV

Scott Gehlbach publication distribution in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Political Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Gehlbach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
20 40 60 80
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 36–40 to 333+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 97. Most scientists, 97, have 333+ publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 121–125 publications, is where this scientist sits. 36–40 publications: 10 scientists 41–45 publications: 11 scientists 46–50 publications: 25 scientists 51–55 publications: 27 scientists 56–60 publications: 44 scientists 61–65 publications: 52 scientists 66–70 publications: 62 scientists 71–75 publications: 62 scientists 76–80 publications: 79 scientists 81–85 publications: 71 scientists 86–90 publications: 82 scientists 91–95 publications: 65 scientists 96–100 publications: 85 scientists 101–105 publications: 76 scientists 106–110 publications: 66 scientists 111–115 publications: 78 scientists 116–120 publications: 67 scientists 121–125 publications: 73 scientists 126–130 publications: 73 scientists 131–135 publications: 64 scientists 136–140 publications: 45 scientists 141–145 publications: 53 scientists 146–150 publications: 44 scientists 151–155 publications: 45 scientists 156–160 publications: 33 scientists 161–165 publications: 32 scientists 166–170 publications: 28 scientists 171–175 publications: 31 scientists 176–180 publications: 29 scientists 181–185 publications: 27 scientists 186–190 publications: 36 scientists 191–195 publications: 27 scientists 196–200 publications: 24 scientists 201–205 publications: 16 scientists 206–210 publications: 16 scientists 211–215 publications: 19 scientists 216–220 publications: 16 scientists 221–225 publications: 17 scientists 226–230 publications: 18 scientists 231–235 publications: 23 scientists 236–240 publications: 17 scientists 241–245 publications: 13 scientists 246–250 publications: 17 scientists 251–255 publications: 9 scientists 256–260 publications: 13 scientists 261–265 publications: 8 scientists 266–270 publications: 12 scientists 271–275 publications: 8 scientists 276–280 publications: 10 scientists 281–285 publications: 13 scientists 286–290 publications: 13 scientists 291–295 publications: 5 scientists 296–300 publications: 6 scientists 301–305 publications: 11 scientists 306–310 publications: 9 scientists 311–315 publications: 6 scientists 316–320 publications: 4 scientists 321–325 publications: 4 scientists 326–330 publications: 2 scientists 331–332 publications: 5 scientists 333+ publications: 97 scientists
36–40 publications 333+

This scientist: 125 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 333 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
36–40 10
41–45 11
46–50 25
51–55 27
56–60 44
61–65 52
66–70 62
71–75 62
76–80 79
81–85 71
86–90 82
91–95 65
96–100 85
101–105 76
106–110 66
111–115 78
116–120 67
121–125 73 125
126–130 73
131–135 64
136–140 45
141–145 53
146–150 44
151–155 45
156–160 33
161–165 32
166–170 28
171–175 31
176–180 29
181–185 27
186–190 36
191–195 27
196–200 24
201–205 16
206–210 16
211–215 19
216–220 16
221–225 17
226–230 18
231–235 23
236–240 17
241–245 13
246–250 17
251–255 9
256–260 13
261–265 8
266–270 12
271–275 8
276–280 10
281–285 13
286–290 13
291–295 5
296–300 6
301–305 11
306–310 9
311–315 6
316–320 4
321–325 4
326–330 2
331–332 5
333+ 97
Download as CSV

Scott Gehlbach D-index placement in Political Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Political Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Scott Gehlbach sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 43 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 20 to 62+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 100. Most scientists, 100, have 62+ D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 29 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 20 D-Index: 76 scientists 21 D-Index: 79 scientists 22 D-Index: 84 scientists 23 D-Index: 68 scientists 24 D-Index: 88 scientists 25 D-Index: 82 scientists 26 D-Index: 76 scientists 27 D-Index: 75 scientists 28 D-Index: 99 scientists 29 D-Index: 96 scientists 30 D-Index: 96 scientists 31 D-Index: 81 scientists 32 D-Index: 86 scientists 33 D-Index: 81 scientists 34 D-Index: 84 scientists 35 D-Index: 72 scientists 36 D-Index: 58 scientists 37 D-Index: 53 scientists 38 D-Index: 48 scientists 39 D-Index: 40 scientists 40 D-Index: 40 scientists 41 D-Index: 32 scientists 42 D-Index: 26 scientists 43 D-Index: 25 scientists 44 D-Index: 33 scientists 45 D-Index: 33 scientists 46 D-Index: 17 scientists 47 D-Index: 21 scientists 48 D-Index: 22 scientists 49 D-Index: 18 scientists 50 D-Index: 19 scientists 51 D-Index: 19 scientists 52 D-Index: 15 scientists 53 D-Index: 14 scientists 54 D-Index: 10 scientists 55 D-Index: 13 scientists 56 D-Index: 9 scientists 57 D-Index: 11 scientists 58 D-Index: 12 scientists 59 D-Index: 10 scientists 60 D-Index: 5 scientists 61 D-Index: 7 scientists 62+ D-Index: 100 scientists
20 D-Index 62+

This scientist: 29 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 62 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Political Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 2,033 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
20 76
21 79
22 84
23 68
24 88
25 82
26 76
27 75
28 99
29 96 29
30 96
31 81
32 86
33 81
34 84
35 72
36 58
37 53
38 48
39 40
40 40
41 32
42 26
43 25
44 33
45 33
46 17
47 21
48 22
49 18
50 19
51 19
52 15
53 14
54 10
55 13
56 9
57 11
58 12
59 10
60 5
61 7
62+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Scott Gehlbach is affiliated with the University of Chicago in the United States. Their research spans a range of topics in political science, sociology, economics, and related fields. The focus lies particularly on political conflict, governance, corruption, electoral systems, social policy, and historical economic studies.

Their recent papers include:

  • "Is Putin's popularity (still) real? A cautionary note on using list experiments to measure popularity in authoritarian regimes" (2023) published in Post-Soviet Affairs
  • "Historical Political Economy: Past, Present, and Future" (2022) published in Annual Review of Political Science
  • "Who Reports Crime? Citizen Engagement with the Police in Russia and Georgia" (2021) published in Europe Asia Studies
  • "Is there really a dictator's dilemma? Information and repression in autocracy" (2025) published in American Journal of Political Science
  • "Correlates of forest-cover change in European Russia, 1989-2012" (2020) published in Land Use Policy

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Delgerjargal Uvsh
  • Peter Potapov
  • Catalina Munteanu
  • Eugenia Bragina
  • Volker C. Radeloff

Scott Gehlbach has published extensively in several venues, most notably:

  • Harvard Dataverse (96 publications)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (5 publications)
  • American Journal of Political Science (3 publications)
  • Post-Soviet Affairs (1 publication)
  • Annual Review of Political Science (1 publication)

The scientist has authored books published by Cambridge University Press, including:

  • "Reform and Rebellion in Weak States" (2020)
  • "Formal Models of Domestic Politics" (2021)

Their research areas intersect several fields and subfields, including:

  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Political Science and International Relations
  • Demography
  • Economics and Econometrics
  • Statistics and Probability

Main topics of their work cover:

  • Culture, Economy, and Development Studies
  • Political Conflict and Governance
  • Corruption and Economic Development
  • Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Historical Economic and Social Studies
  • Survey Sampling and Estimation Techniques
  • Electoral Systems and Political Participation

Best Publications

  • Investment without Democracy : Ruling-Party Institutionalization and Credible Commitment in Autocracies

    Scott Gehlbach;Philip Keefer

  • Private Investment and the Institutionalization of Collective Action in Autocracies: Ruling Parties and Legislatures

    Scott Gehlbach;Philip Keefer

  • Formal Models of Nondemocratic Politics

    Scott Gehlbach;Konstantin Sonin;Konstantin Sonin;Konstantin Sonin;Milan W. Svolik

  • Businessman Candidates: BUSINESSMAN CANDIDATES

    Scott Gehlbach;Konstantin Sonin;Ekaterina Zhuravskaya

  • Is Putin’s popularity real?

    Timothy Frye;Scott Gehlbach;Kyle L. Marquardt;Ora John Reuter

  • A Formal Model of Exit and Voice

    Scott Gehlbach

  • The Contribution of Veto Players to Economic Reform

    Scott Gehlbach;Edmund J. Malesky

  • Electoral manipulation as bureaucratic control

    Scott Gehlbach;Alberto Simpser

  • Reflections on Putin and the Media

    Scott Gehlbach

  • The Productivity Consequences of Political Turnover: Firm-Level Evidence from Ukraine's Orange Revolution

    John S. Earle;Scott Gehlbach

  • Helping Hand or Grabbing Hand? State Bureaucracy and Privatization Effectiveness

    J. David Brown;John S. Earle;Scott G. Gehlbach

  • Formal Models of Domestic Politics

    Scott Gehlbach

  • Does Reform Prevent Rebellion? Evidence From Russia’s Emancipation of the Serfs:

    Evgeny Finkel;Scott Gehlbach;Tricia D. Olsen

  • Representation through Taxation

    Unknown

  • Representation through Taxation: Revenue, Politics, and Development in Postcommunist States

    Scott Gehlbach

  • Formal Models of Domestic Politics

    Unknown

  • Investment without Democracy: Ruling-Party Institutionalization and Credible Commitment in Autocracies

    Scott Gehlbach;Philip Keefer

  • Formal Models of Domestic Politics

    Unknown

  • The Consequences of Collective Action: An Incomplete-Contracts Approach

    Scott Gehlbach

  • Institutions, Property Rights, and Economic Growth: The Legacy of Douglass North

    Sebastián Galiani;Itai Sened

  • Reform and Rebellion in Weak States

    Evgeny Finkel;Scott Gehlbach

  • What Is a Big Bureaucracy? :Reflections on ‘Rebuilding Leviathan’ and ‘Runaway State-building’

    Scott Gehlbach

  • Property rights in post-Soviet Russia: violence, corruption, and the demand for law

    Scott Gehlbach

  • Social Networks and Corruption

    Scott Gehlbach

  • Shifting Electoral Geography in Russia's 1991 and 1996 Presidential Elections

    Scott Gehlbach

  • Mass Privatization, Distributive Politics, and Popular Support for Reform in the Czech Republic

    John S. Earle;John S. Earle;Scott G. Gehlbach;Zuzana Saková

  • Taxability, Elections, and Government Support of Business Activity

    Scott G. Gehlbach

  • Did Post-communist Privatization Increase Mortality?

    John S Earle;Scott Gehlbach

  • Online Appendixes for \Does Reform Prevent Rebellion? Evidence from Russia's Emancipation of the Serfs"

    Evgeny Finkel;Scott Gehlbach;Tricia Olsen

  • Preying on the State: The Transformation of Bulgaria after 1989 . By Venelin I. Ganev. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 2007. 222p. $39.95.

    Scott Gehlbach

  • Cooperating with the State: Evidence from Survey Experiments on Policing

    Noah Buckley;Noah Buckley;Timothy Frye;Timothy Frye;Scott Gehlbach;Lauren A. McCarthy

Frequent Co-Authors

John S. Earle
John S. Earle George Mason University
Konstantin Sonin
Konstantin Sonin University of Chicago
Timothy Frye
Timothy Frye Columbia University
Edmund J. Malesky
Edmund J. Malesky Duke University
Philip Keefer
Philip Keefer Inter-American Development Bank
Peter Potapov
Peter Potapov University of Maryland, College Park
Ekaterina Zhuravskaya
Ekaterina Zhuravskaya Paris School of Economics
Volker C. Radeloff
Volker C. Radeloff University of Wisconsin–Madison
Milan W. Svolik
Milan W. Svolik Yale University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Political Science can open doors to a wide range of online degrees and career paths. Students interested in policy, research, or social impact often pursue interdisciplinary studies to broaden their expertise and job prospects.

For instance, jobs with bachelor's in elementary education and environmental science highlight the growing demand for professionals who can address complex global issues by merging political, educational, and environmental knowledge.

Those with strong analytical skills might consider online mathematics degrees, which are valuable for data analysis roles within government and policy organizations.

If you are interested in research, information services, or advocacy, online programs for library science provide training in data management and public resource access. Similarly, understanding the past through types of history degrees can deepen your grasp of political contexts and cultural trends.

No matter your focus, combining Political Science with related fields can enhance your versatility and prepare you for impactful careers across public, private, and nonprofit sectors.

Best Scientists Citing Scott Gehlbach

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles