World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
41
Citations
14699
World Ranking
8590
National Ranking
518

Nick Kingsbury publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick Kingsbury sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 209 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nick Kingsbury D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nick Kingsbury sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Nick Kingsbury is affiliated with the University of Cambridge in the United Kingdom. Their academic profile reflects a focus on research activities within a reputed institution, contributing to the university's scholarly environment.

While no specific recent papers are listed in their profile, their ongoing affiliation with a leading research university suggests engagement with current academic discourse.

There is no data available on frequent co-authors, indicating either a solitary research approach or a lack of publicly listed collaborations at this time.

The profile does not provide information about frequent publication venues, leaving details about preferred journals or conferences unspecified.

No book publications have been recorded, which suggests their scholarly output may currently emphasize articles and research papers rather than book authorship.

There is no data on main fields of study, subfields, or main topics of work. This absence of specified research areas limits detailed insight into the exact scientific domains or thematic concentrations pursued by Nick Kingsbury.

The profile does not list any awards, which means there are no known distinctions currently attributed to their work based on the available data.

Best Publications

  • The dual-tree complex wavelet transform

    I.W. Selesnick;R.G. Baraniuk;N.C. Kingsbury

  • Complex Wavelets for Shift Invariant Analysis and Filtering of Signals

    Nick Kingsbury

  • Image processing with complex wavelets

    Nick Kingsbury

  • The dual-tree complex wavelet transform: a new technique for shift invariance and directional filters

    NG Kingsbury

  • A dual-tree complex wavelet transform with improved orthogonality and symmetry properties

    N. Kingsbury

  • The dual-tree complex wavelet transform: A new efficient tool for image restoration and enhancement

    Nick Kingsbury

  • A distortion measure for blocking artifacts in images based on human visual sensitivity

    S.A. Karunasekera;N.G. Kingsbury

  • The EREC: an error-resilient technique for coding variable-length blocks of data

    D.W. Redmill;N.G. Kingsbury

  • Shift invariant properties of the dual-tree complex wavelet transform

    N. Kingsbury

  • Motion estimation using a complex-valued wavelet transform

    J. Magarey;N. Kingsbury

  • Digital filtering using logarithmic arithmetic

    N.G. Kingsbury;P.J.W. Rayner

  • Flexible design of multidimensional perfect reconstruction FIR 2-band filters using transformations of variables

    D.B.H. Tay;N.G. Kingsbury

  • Signal Analysis and Prediction

    Ales Prochazka;Nicholas Kingsbury;P. J. W. Payner;J. Uhlir

  • Design of Q-shift complex wavelets for image processing using frequency domain energy minimization

    N. Kingsbury

  • Hidden Markov tree modeling of complex wavelet transforms

    Hyeokho Choi;J. Romberg;R. Baraniuk;N. Kingsbury

  • Atmospheric Turbulence Mitigation Using Complex Wavelet-Based Fusion

    N. Anantrasirichai;A. Achim;N. G. Kingsbury;D. R. Bull

  • Digital watermarking using complex wavelets

    P. Loo;N. Kingsbury

  • Frequency-domain motion estimation using a complex lapped transform

    R.W. Young;N.G. Kingsbury

  • Wavelet Transforms in Image Processing

    Nick Kingsbury;Julian Magarey

  • Image Denoising Using Derotated Complex Wavelet Coefficients

    M. Miller;N. Kingsbury

Frequent Co-Authors

Graham M. Treece
Graham M. Treece University of Cambridge
Andrew H. Gee
Andrew H. Gee University of Cambridge
Richard W. Prager
Richard W. Prager University of Cambridge
Richard G. Baraniuk
Richard G. Baraniuk Rice University
David Bull
David Bull University of Bristol
Richard Hobbs
Richard Hobbs Durham University
Shanika Karunasekera
Shanika Karunasekera University of Melbourne
Simon J. Godsill
Simon J. Godsill University of Cambridge
Clive Oppenheimer
Clive Oppenheimer University of Cambridge
Sanjit K. Mitra
Sanjit K. Mitra University of California, Santa Barbara

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science pathways opens the door to a variety of other academic and professional opportunities. Choosing the right majors in college can help align your study with your career goals, especially in tech-driven fields. Many students continue their education with graduate programs, and online options have made this more accessible than ever.

For those seeking flexibility, you might consider pursuing the easiest masters degree to get online, which can offer career advancement with a manageable workload. Cost is also a key factor. Fortunately, there are numerous cheapest phd programs available online, making high-level education more affordable.

Additionally, educators and professionals looking to upskill quickly might explore shortest online edd programs for fast-track doctoral options. Whichever path you choose, online degrees can significantly expand your learning and career prospects in the evolving world of computer science.

Best Scientists Citing Nick Kingsbury

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles