World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Earth Science

D-Index
40
Citations
5851
World Ranking
5849
National Ranking
622

Richard Hobbs publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Hobbs sits on this spectrum.

38–42 publications: 1 scientists 43–47 publications: 0 scientists 48–52 publications: 3 scientists 53–57 publications: 8 scientists 58–62 publications: 11 scientists 63–67 publications: 16 scientists 68–72 publications: 24 scientists 73–77 publications: 31 scientists 78–82 publications: 49 scientists 83–87 publications: 77 scientists 88–92 publications: 86 scientists 93–97 publications: 88 scientists 98–102 publications: 92 scientists 103–107 publications: 84 scientists 108–112 publications: 102 scientists 113–117 publications: 108 scientists 118–122 publications: 117 scientists 123–127 publications: 126 scientists 128–132 publications: 146 scientists 133–137 publications: 114 scientists 138–142 publications: 102 scientists 143–147 publications: 127 scientists 148–152 publications: 102 scientists 153–157 publications: 112 scientists 158–162 publications: 102 scientists 163–167 publications: 127 scientists 168–172 publications: 121 scientists 173–177 publications: 112 scientists 178–182 publications: 109 scientists 183–187 publications: 98 scientists 188–192 publications: 92 scientists 193–197 publications: 105 scientists 198–202 publications: 77 scientists 203–207 publications: 80 scientists 208–212 publications: 89 scientists 213–217 publications: 70 scientists 218–222 publications: 74 scientists 223–227 publications: 74 scientists 228–232 publications: 70 scientists 233–237 publications: 67 scientists 238–242 publications: 59 scientists 243–247 publications: 67 scientists 248–252 publications: 51 scientists 253–257 publications: 46 scientists 258–262 publications: 41 scientists 263–267 publications: 39 scientists 268–272 publications: 34 scientists 273–277 publications: 39 scientists 278–282 publications: 35 scientists 283–287 publications: 36 scientists 288–292 publications: 35 scientists 293–297 publications: 29 scientists 298–302 publications: 23 scientists 303–307 publications: 39 scientists 308–312 publications: 34 scientists 313–317 publications: 23 scientists 318–322 publications: 18 scientists 323–327 publications: 18 scientists 328–332 publications: 21 scientists 333–337 publications: 20 scientists 338–342 publications: 15 scientists 343–347 publications: 13 scientists 348–352 publications: 24 scientists 353–357 publications: 25 scientists 358–362 publications: 10 scientists 363–367 publications: 20 scientists 368–372 publications: 17 scientists 373–377 publications: 18 scientists 378–382 publications: 15 scientists 383–387 publications: 7 scientists 388–392 publications: 22 scientists 393–397 publications: 9 scientists 398–402 publications: 11 scientists 403–407 publications: 16 scientists 408–412 publications: 4 scientists 413–417 publications: 5 scientists 418–422 publications: 14 scientists 423–427 publications: 8 scientists 428–432 publications: 7 scientists 433–437 publications: 7 scientists 438–442 publications: 10 scientists 443–447 publications: 10 scientists 448–452 publications: 3 scientists 453–457 publications: 9 scientists 458–462 publications: 11 scientists 463–467 publications: 4 scientists 468–472 publications: 6 scientists 473–477 publications: 11 scientists 478–482 publications: 8 scientists 483–487 publications: 2 scientists 488–492 publications: 3 scientists 493–497 publications: 4 scientists 498–502 publications: 4 scientists 503–507 publications: 4 scientists 508–509 publications: 4 scientists 510+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 510+

This scientist: 280 publications — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 510 publications or more.

Richard Hobbs D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Hobbs sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 15 scientists 31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32 D-Index: 60 scientists 33 D-Index: 90 scientists 34 D-Index: 103 scientists 35 D-Index: 108 scientists 36 D-Index: 142 scientists 37 D-Index: 147 scientists 38 D-Index: 147 scientists 39 D-Index: 152 scientists 40 D-Index: 143 scientists 41 D-Index: 157 scientists 42 D-Index: 141 scientists 43 D-Index: 151 scientists 44 D-Index: 140 scientists 45 D-Index: 135 scientists 46 D-Index: 121 scientists 47 D-Index: 108 scientists 48 D-Index: 128 scientists 49 D-Index: 111 scientists 50 D-Index: 106 scientists 51 D-Index: 112 scientists 52 D-Index: 102 scientists 53 D-Index: 103 scientists 54 D-Index: 94 scientists 55 D-Index: 61 scientists 56 D-Index: 101 scientists 57 D-Index: 71 scientists 58 D-Index: 65 scientists 59 D-Index: 78 scientists 60 D-Index: 93 scientists 61 D-Index: 56 scientists 62 D-Index: 58 scientists 63 D-Index: 52 scientists 64 D-Index: 63 scientists 65 D-Index: 49 scientists 66 D-Index: 53 scientists 67 D-Index: 57 scientists 68 D-Index: 50 scientists 69 D-Index: 44 scientists 70 D-Index: 44 scientists 71 D-Index: 31 scientists 72 D-Index: 33 scientists 73 D-Index: 33 scientists 74 D-Index: 23 scientists 75 D-Index: 32 scientists 76 D-Index: 24 scientists 77 D-Index: 17 scientists 78 D-Index: 19 scientists 79 D-Index: 9 scientists 80 D-Index: 21 scientists 81 D-Index: 20 scientists 82 D-Index: 17 scientists 83 D-Index: 19 scientists 84 D-Index: 19 scientists 85 D-Index: 14 scientists 86 D-Index: 6 scientists 87 D-Index: 14 scientists 88 D-Index: 17 scientists 89 D-Index: 10 scientists 90 D-Index: 8 scientists 91 D-Index: 8 scientists 92 D-Index: 9 scientists 93 D-Index: 6 scientists 94+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 94+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 26th percentile

26% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 94 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard Hobbs is a researcher affiliated with Durham University in the United Kingdom. Their academic focus spans Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Physics and Astronomy, with a substantial number of publications contributing to both fields.

The scientist's work extensively covers several subfields, including Geophysics, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Environmental Chemistry, Ocean Engineering, and Oceanography. Within these areas, their main topics of research include Seismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques, Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena, Reservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods, earthquake and tectonic studies, Astronomy and Astrophysical Research, Geological and Geochemical Analysis, and studies related to Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae.

Richard Hobbs has published a notable volume of scientific articles, with recent papers including:

  • COMAP Early Science. I. Overview (2022), published in The Astrophysical Journal
  • Abrupt episode of mid-Cretaceous ocean acidification triggered by massive volcanism (2023), published in Nature Geoscience
  • COMAP Early Science. V. Constraints and Forecasts at z ∼ 3 (2022), published in The Astrophysical Journal
  • COMAP Early Science. VII. Prospects for CO Intensity Mapping at Reionization (2022), published in The Astrophysical Journal
  • Evolution of the Southwest Australian Rifted Continental Margin During Breakup of East Gondwana: Results From International Ocean Discovery Program Expedition 369 (2020), published in Geochemistry Geophysics Geosystems

The researcher frequently collaborates with other scientists. Their most common co-authors include Lloyd T. White, Laurent Riquier, Matthew M. Jones, Sietske J. Batenburg, and Kenneth G. MacLeod.

Richard Hobbs's work has appeared across multiple publication venues, among which the most frequent are:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • The Astrophysical Journal
  • Geophysical Journal International
  • Publishing Network for Geoscientific and Environmental Data (PANGAEA) (Alfred Wegener Institute for Polar and Marine Research)
  • The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America

Best Publications

  • A framework for 3-D joint inversion of MT, gravity and seismic refraction data

    Max Moorkamp;Björn Heincke;Marion Jegen;Alan W. Roberts

  • Size and morphology of the Chicxulub impact crater

    Jo Morgan;Mike Warner;John Brittan

  • Joint inversion of marine magnetotelluric and gravity data incorporating seismic constraints: Preliminary results of sub-basalt imaging off the Faroe Shelf

    Marion D. Jegen;Richard W. Hobbs;Pascal Tarits;Alan Chave

  • The BIRPS Atlas : Deep Seismic Reflection Profiles Around the British Isles

    Simon Klemperer;Richard Hobbs

  • The deep structure of northern England and the Iapetus Suture zone from BIRPS deep seismic reflection profiles

    B. Freeman;S. L. Klemperer;R. W. Hobbs

  • MONA LISA : Deep seismic investigations of the lithosphere in the southeastern North Sea

    T. Abramovitz;A. Berthelsen;F. Schjøth;H. Thybo

  • Evidence from three-dimensional seismic reflectivity images for enhanced melt supply beneath mid-ocean -ridge discontinuities

    G. M. Kent;S. C. Singh;S. C. Singh;A. J. Harding;M. C. Sinha;M. C. Sinha

  • Ocean temperature and salinity inverted from combined hydrographic and seismic data

    Cord Papenberg;Dirk Klaeschen;Gerd Krahmann;R. W. Hobbs

  • Flood basalt facies from borehole data: implications for prospectivity and volcanology in volcanic rifted margins

    Catherine E. Nelson;Dougal A. Jerram;Richard W. Hobbs

  • The crust as a heterogeneous “optical” medium, or “crocodiles in the mist”

    A. Levander;A. Levander;R.W. Hobbs;S.K. Smith;R.W. England

  • Evidence for a thick free gas layer beneath the bottom simulating reflector in the Makran accretionary prism

    K Sain;K Sain;T.A Minshull;S.C Singh;R.W Hobbs

  • Understanding the offshore flood basalt sequence using onshore volcanic facies analogues : an example from the Faroe-Shetland basin.

    Dougal A. Jerram;Richard T. Single;Richard W. Hobbs;Catherine E. Nelson

  • Mapping and analysing virtual outcrops

    Immo Trinks;Phillip Clegg;Ken McCaffrey;Richard Jones

  • Estimating mixing rates from seismic images of oceanic structure

    K. L. Sheen;N. J. White;R. W. Hobbs

  • Joint Inversion of MT, Gravity and Seismic Data applied to sub-basalt Imaging

    Bjoern Heincke;Marion Jegen;Richard Hobbs

  • High resolution seismic imaging of the ocean structure using a small volume airgun source array in the Gulf of Cadiz

    Louis Geli;Emmanuel Cosquer;R. W. Hobbs;D. Klaeschen

  • Verification of velocity‐resistivity relationships derived from structural joint inversion with borehole data

    Max Moorkamp;Max Moorkamp;A. W. Roberts;Marion D. Jegen;Björn Heincke

  • Seismic structure, gravity anomalies, and flexure of the Amazon continental margin, NE Brazil

    A. B. Watts;M. Rodger;C. Peirce;C. J. Greenroyd

  • Basin-forming processes and the deep structure of the Campos basin, offshore Brazil

    W.U. Mohriak;R. Hobbs;J.F. Dewey

  • The role of pre-existing structures during rifting, continental breakup and transform system development, offshore West Greenland

    Alexander Peace;Ken McCaffrey;Jonathan Imber;Jeroen van Hunen

Frequent Co-Authors

Dirk Klaeschen
Dirk Klaeschen GEOMAR Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research Kiel
Simon Deakin
Simon Deakin University of Cambridge
Robert S. White
Robert S. White University of Cambridge
Satish C. Singh
Satish C. Singh Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
Kenneth G. MacLeod
Kenneth G. MacLeod University of Missouri
Ramón Carbonell
Ramón Carbonell Spanish National Research Council
Robert N. Harris
Robert N. Harris Oregon State University
Robert P. Lowell
Robert P. Lowell Virginia Tech
Sandro Carniel
Sandro Carniel National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine
Valentí Sallarès
Valentí Sallarès Spanish National Research Council

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science opens doors to diverse career options, often enhanced by complementary skills. Exploring an online degree in photography, for example, can be valuable for professionals interested in capturing geological formations or environmental changes. Photography skills add a visual dimension to scientific documentation and communication.

Veterans looking to pivot into Earth Science or related fields may find tailored programs like the online photography bachelor degree for veterans particularly accommodating. These degrees accommodate military experience and facilitate a smooth transition into civilian careers.

Additionally, language skills are critical in many scientific careers, especially given the global nature of today’s research collaborations. Pursuing a spanish online degree can enhance communication and open international opportunities within environmental agencies, education, or research.

For veterans interested in language studies, the spanish degree online for veterans offers targeted support and flexible options. Combining Earth Science with these complementary online degrees can lead to dynamic and rewarding career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Hobbs

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles