World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 60 1482 1325 276 250 290 12295

Rick Iedema publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Rick Iedema between 1993 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Rick Iedema published across 29 years, from 1993 to 2021, averaging 10.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 32 publications in 2008. 23 of the 297 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1993 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 32. Peak 32 publications in 2008. 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 2 publications 1999: 2 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 15 publications 2004: 11 publications 2005: 14 publications 2006: 18 publications 2007: 19 publications 2008: 32 publications 2009: 14 publications 2010: 18 publications 2011: 19 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 8 publications 2014: 22 publications 2015: 19 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 8 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 8 publications 2021: 15 publications
1993 2021

297 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Rick Iedema: publications per year, 1993 to 2021
Year Publications
1993 1
1994 0
1995 2
1996 1
1997 1
1998 2
1999 2
2000 0
2001 4
2002 2
2003 15
2004 11
2005 14
2006 18
2007 19
2008 32
2009 14
2010 18
2011 19
2012 11
2013 8
2014 22
2015 19
2016 6
2017 8
2018 12
2019 13
2020 8
2021 15
Total 297
Download as CSV

Rick Iedema publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rick Iedema sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 284–293 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 290 publications — 86th percentile

86% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113 290
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Rick Iedema D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Rick Iedema sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 60 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 60 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106 60
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Rick Iedema is affiliated with King's College London in the United Kingdom and specializes primarily in the field of medicine. Their research spans several subfields, including endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, as well as epidemiology.

The scientist's work concentrates on topics such as hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients, sepsis diagnosis and treatment, and diabetes management and research.

Rick Iedema has contributed to multiple publications in recognized venues. These include:

  • 14 Trust after avoidable harm in maternity care: the possibilities of ethical affordance (2021) - Oral Presentations
  • Exploring the Use of Variable Rate Intravenous Insulin Infusion in Hospital: A Hierarchical Task Analysis (2021) - International Journal of Pharmacy Practice

Frequent coauthors collaborating with Rick Iedema are:

  • Milton S. Adams
  • Jane Sandall
  • Jo Hartley
  • MaisHasan Iflaifel
  • Rosemary Lim

Best Publications

  • Multimodality, resemiotization: extending the analysis of discourse as multi-semiotic practice

    Rick Iedema

  • Analysing film and television: a social semiotic account of 'Hospital: an Unhealthy Business'

    RA Iedema

  • The Participatory Zeitgeist: an explanatory theoretical model of change in an era of coproduction and codesign in healthcare improvement.

    Victoria Palmer;Wayne Weavell;Rosemary Callander;Donella Piper

  • Discourses of post-bureaucratic organization

    Rick Iedema

  • Introduction: Organizational Discourses and Practices:

    Rick Iedema;Ruth Wodak

  • Patients’ and family members’ views on how clinicians enact and how they should enact incident disclosure: the “100 patient stories” qualitative study

    Rick A M Iedema;Suellen Allen;Katherine Britton;Donella Piper

  • From Doing Work to Talking Work: Renegotiating Knowing, Doing, and Identity

    Rick Iedema;Hermine Scheeres

  • ‘It’s an Interesting Conversation I’m Hearing’: The Doctor as Manager:

    Rick Iedema;Pieter Degeling;Jeffrey Braithwaite;Les White

  • Multimethod evaluation of information and communication technologies in health in the context of wicked problems and sociotechnical theory.

    Johanna I. Westbrook;Jeffrey Braithwaite;Andrew Georgiou;Amanda Ampt

  • Reshaping ICU Ward Round Practices Using Video-Reflexive Ethnography

    Katherine Carroll;Rick Iedema;Ross Kerridge

  • Making clinical governance work

    Pieter J Degeling;Sharyn Maxwell;Rick Iedema;David J Hunter

  • Identity trouble : critical discourse and contested identities

    Carmen Rosa Caldas-Coulthard;Rick Iedema

  • On the Multi-modality, Materially and Contingency of Organization Discourse

    Rick Iedema

  • Visibilising clinical work: Video ethnography in the contemporary hospital

    Rick Iedema;Deborah Enid Long;Rowena Forsyth;Bonne Bonsan Lee

  • Design and trial of a new ambulance-to-emergency department handover protocol: ‘IMIST-AMBO’

    Rick Iedema;Chris Ball;Barbara Daly;Jacinta Young

  • Visualising Health Care Practice Improvement: Innovation from Within

    Rick Iedema;Jessica Mesman;Katherine Carroll

  • A prospective, multi-method, multi-disciplinary, multi-level, collaborative, social-organisational design for researching health sector accreditation [LP0560737].

    Jeffrey Braithwaite;Johanna Westbrook;Marjorie Pawsey;David Greenfield

  • Formalizing Organizational Meaning

    Rick Iedema

  • The missing evidence: a systematic review of patients' experiences of adverse events in health care.

    Reema Harrison;Merrilyn Walton;Elizabeth Manias;Jennifer Smith-Merry

  • Codesigning as a Discursive Practice in Emergency Health Services: The Architecture of Deliberation

    Rick Iedema;Eamon Merrick;Donella Piper;Kate Britton

Frequent Co-Authors

Jeffrey Braithwaite
Jeffrey Braithwaite Macquarie University
Elizabeth Manias
Elizabeth Manias Deakin University
Johanna I. Westbrook
Johanna I. Westbrook Macquarie University
Gwendolyn L. Gilbert
Gwendolyn L. Gilbert University of Sydney
Vikki Entwistle
Vikki Entwistle University of Aberdeen
David J. Roberts
David J. Roberts University of Oxford
John Wright
John Wright National Health Service
Carl Rhodes
Carl Rhodes University of Technology Sydney
Andrew Georgiou
Andrew Georgiou Macquarie University
David Grant
David Grant Griffith University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in dynamic fields within Social Sciences and Humanities, a range of flexible online degree programs are available in the USA. Many universities now offer options that allow you to earn your degree faster, making it easier to adapt your education to your personal and professional goals.

If you want to work in clinical and community settings, consider pursuing an accelerated msw program online. These programs prepare you for advanced roles in social work with a focus on real-world practice. Psychology is another popular field, with options like an accelerated bachelor's in psychology enabling you to start your career or graduate studies sooner.

If counseling is your passion, look for cacrep accredited schools to ensure your education meets high professional standards. Alternatively, those interested in relationship and family dynamics can advance their expertise through a masters in marriage and family therapy online.

Exploring these online degrees can open the door to rewarding roles in mental health, education, community outreach, and more.

Best Scientists Citing Rick Iedema

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles