World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
6994
World Ranking
7571
National Ranking
4075

Louis A. Gottschalk publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louis A. Gottschalk sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 229 publications — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Louis A. Gottschalk D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Louis A. Gottschalk sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1958 - Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS)

Overview

Louis A. Gottschalk was affiliated with the University of California, Irvine in the United States. Their academic career included contributions acknowledged by peers, including recognition as a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in 1958.

Their research output did not list specific recent publications, nor did available records provide details on frequent co-authors, publication venues, or specific topics and fields of study pursued. There was also no data indicating involvement in book publications or other editorial contributions.

Gottschalk's professional profile indicates involvement in scientific academia without detailed public records of papers or subjects of focus. Their recognized status within scientific associations reflects a degree of professional acknowledgment during their career.

Their legacy remains tied to their affiliation and acknowledgment within significant scientific organizations rather than specific documented works or collaborations.

Best Publications

  • The measurement of psychological states through the content analysis of verbal behavior

    Louis A. Gottschalk;Goldine C. Gleser

  • Cortical-striatal-thalamic circuits and brain glucose metabolic activity in 70 unmedicated male schizophrenic patients.

    Benjamin V. Siegel;Monte S. Buchsbaum;William E. Bunney;Louis A. Gottschalk

  • D2 dopamine receptor polymorphism and brain regional glucose metabolism

    Ernest P. Noble;Louis A. Gottschalk;James H. Fallon;Terry L. Ritchie

  • A Hope scale applicable to verbal samples.

    Louis A. Gottschalk

  • Striatal metabolic rate and clinical response to neuroleptics in schizophrenia

    Monte S. Buchsbaum;Steven G. Potkin;Benjamin V. Siegel;James Lohr

  • Manual of Instructions for Using the Gottschalk-Gleser Content Analysis Scales: Anxiety, Hostility and Social Alienation - Personal Disorganization

    Louis A. Gottschalk;Carolyn N. Winget;Goldine C. Gleser

  • Methods of research in psychotherapy

    Louis A. Gottschalk;Arthur H. Auerbach

  • Manual of Instructions for Using the Gottschalk-Gleser Content Analysis Scales

    Louis A. Gottschalk;Carolyn N. Winget;Goldine C. Gleser

  • Risperidone for the treatment of stuttering.

    Gerald A. Maguire;Glyndon D. Riley;David L. Franklin;Louis A. Gottschalk

  • Relationship between neuropsychological performance and alcohol consumption in alcoholics.

    M. J. Eckardt;E. S. Parker;Ernest P. Noble;D. J. Feldman

  • Three hostility scales applicable to verbal samples.

    Louis A. Gottschalk;Goldine C. Gleser;Kayla J. Springer

  • Abstinence and normal drinking. An assessment of changes in drinking patterns in alcoholics after treatment.

    Pattison Em;Headley Eb;Gleser Gc;Gottschalk La

  • The relationship of sex and intelligence to choice of words: a normative study of verbal behavior.

    Goldine C. Gleser;Louis A. Gottschalk;Watkins John

  • Prediction and evaluation of outcome in an emergency brief psychotherapy clinic.

    Louis A. Gottschalk;Peter Mayerson;Anthony A. Gottlieb

  • Content analysis of verbal behavior : significance in clinical medicine and psychiatry

    Louis A. Gottschalk;Fernando Lolas;Linda L. Viney

  • Content Analysis of Verbal Behavior : New Findings and Clinical Applications

    Louis August Gottschalk

  • The Content analysis of verbal behavior : further studies

    Louis A. Gottschalk

  • An anxiety scale applicable to verbal samples.

    Goldine C. Gleser;Louis A. Gottschalk;Kayla J. Springer

  • Hope and other deterrents to illness.

    Louis A. Gottschalk

  • Content analysis of verbal behavior

    Louis A. Gottschalk;Fernando Lolas;Linda Louise Viney

Frequent Co-Authors

Goldine C. Gleser
Goldine C. Gleser University of Cincinnati Medical Center
Monte S. Buchsbaum
Monte S. Buchsbaum University of California, San Diego
Graeme J. Taylor
Graeme J. Taylor University of Toronto
Joseph C. Wu
Joseph C. Wu Stanford University
Giovanni A. Fava
Giovanni A. Fava University at Buffalo, State University of New York
Chandra A. Reynolds
Chandra A. Reynolds University of California, Riverside
Lester Luborsky
Lester Luborsky University of Pennsylvania
Steven G. Potkin
Steven G. Potkin University of California, Irvine
Richard J. Haier
Richard J. Haier University of California, Irvine
Brunna Tuschen-Caffier
Brunna Tuschen-Caffier University of Freiburg

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Earning a degree in Psychology opens the door to a variety of rewarding online programs and career opportunities, especially in counseling and mental health services. For example, those interested in addiction recovery may consider the paths outlined for Indianapolis substance abuse counselors education requirements and Irvine substance abuse counselors education requirements. These local guides highlight region-specific academic pathways, licensure needs, and practical experience requirements.

Many states and cities require at least a bachelor’s in psychology or a related field, while advanced counseling roles may require a master’s degree and further certification. Detailed guidance is also available for becoming a substance abuse counselor in Irving and Jacksonville substance abuse counselors education requirements. Exploring these routes through accredited online degrees can be a flexible way to meet educational criteria, gain specialized skills, and prepare for relevant certifications.

Whether your goal is clinical practice, counseling, or case management, understanding each region’s requirements will help you plan a successful career after studying psychology in the USA.

Best Scientists Citing Louis A. Gottschalk

Recently Published Articles