World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
79
Citations
23748
World Ranking
1676
National Ranking
819

Daniel W. Hommer publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel W. Hommer sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 186 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Daniel W. Hommer D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel W. Hommer sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 79 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel W. Hommer was affiliated with the National Institutes of Health in the United States during their career in scientific research. Their professional activities were grounded within this prominent research institution, indicating a role connected to biomedical or health-related investigations.

No recent papers, specific publication titles, or details about co-authors were documented in the available data. Similarly, there is no information about frequent publication venues, book publications, fields or subfields of study, or the main topics addressed in their research.

There are no records of awards received by Daniel W. Hommer in the provided data. The absence of these details limits a more comprehensive overview of the scientist's contributions and specific areas of expertise.

The scientist was deceased, and all references to their career are presented in the past tense accordingly.

Best Publications

  • Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens.

    Brian Knutson;Charles M. Adams;Grace W. Fong;Daniel Hommer

  • Dissociation of reward anticipation and outcome with event-related fMRI

    Brian Knutson;Grace W. Fong;Charles M. Adams;Jerald L. Varner

  • FMRI visualization of brain activity during a monetary incentive delay task.

    Brian Knutson;Andrew Westdorp;Erica Kaiser;Daniel Hommer

  • A region of mesial prefrontal cortex tracks monetarily rewarding outcomes: characterization with rapid event-related fMRI

    Brian Knutson;Grace W Fong;Shannon M Bennett;Charles M Adams

  • Incentive-Elicited Brain Activation in Adolescents: Similarities and Differences from Young Adults

    James M. Bjork;Brian Knutson;Grace W. Fong;Daniel M. Caggiano

  • Impulsivity in abstinent alcohol-dependent patients: relation to control subjects and type 1–/type 2–like traits

    James M. Bjork;Daniel W. Hommer;Steven J. Grant;Cinnamon Danube

  • Hippocampal volume in patients with alcohol dependence

    Ingrid Agartz;Reza Momenan;Robert R. Rawlings;Michael J. Kerich

  • Peptide-monoamine coexistence: Studies of the actions of cholecystokinin-like peptide on the electrical activity of midbrain dopamine neurons

    L.R. Skirboll;A.A. Grace;D.W. Hommer;J. Rehfeld

  • Evidence for a Gender-Related Effect of Alcoholism on Brain Volumes

    Daniel W. Hommer;Reza Momenan;Erica Kaiser;Robert R. Rawlings

  • A genetic determinant of the striatal dopamine response to alcohol in men

    Vijay A. Ramchandani;John Umhau;Francisco J. Pavon;Victor Ruiz-Velasco

  • Effects of acute tryptophan depletion on plasma and cerebrospinal fluid tryptophan and 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid in normal volunteers.

    W. A. Williams;S. E. Shoaf;D. Hommer;R. Rawlings

  • Adolescents, adults and rewards: comparing motivational neurocircuitry recruitment using fMRI.

    James M. Bjork;Ashley R. Smith;Gang Chen;Daniel W. Hommer

  • Neuroleptic-induced decrease in plasma homovanillic acid and antipsychotic activity in schizophrenic patients.

    David Pickar;Rodrigo Labarca;Markku Linnoila;Alec Roy

  • Why We Like to Drink: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Rewarding and Anxiolytic Effects of Alcohol

    Jodi M. Gilman;Vijay A. Ramchandani;Megan B. Davis;James M. Bjork

  • Innervation of substantia nigra neurons by cholinergic afferents from pedunculopontine nucleus in the rat: neuroanatomical and electrophysiological evidence

    P.B.S. Clarke;D.W. Hommer;A. Pert;L.R. Skirboll

  • Neurokinin 1 receptor antagonism as a possible therapy for alcoholism.

    David T. George;Jodi Gilman;Jacqueline Hersh;Annika Thorsell

  • Electrophysiological actions of nicotine on substantia nigra single units

    P.B.S. Clarke;D.W. Hommer;A. Pert;L.R. Skirboll

  • Childhood-Onset Schizophrenia: An NIMH Study in Progress

    Charles T. Gordon;Jean A. Frazier;Kathleen McKenna;Jay N. Giedd

  • Amphetamine modulates human incentive processing.

    Brian Knutson;James M Bjork;Grace W Fong;Daniel Hommer

  • In Vivo Association Between Alcohol Intoxication, Aggression, and Serotonin Transporter Availability in Nonhuman Primates

    Andreas Heinz;J. Dee Higley;Julia G. Gorey;Richard C. Saunders

  • Statistical analysis of functional MRI data in the wavelet domain

    U.E. Ruttimann;M. Unser;R.R. Rawlings;D. Rio

Frequent Co-Authors

Reza Momenan
Reza Momenan National Institutes of Health
James M. Bjork
James M. Bjork Virginia Commonwealth University
Brian Knutson
Brian Knutson Stanford University
Markus Heilig
Markus Heilig Linköping University
David Pickar
David Pickar National Institutes of Health
Markku Linnoila
Markku Linnoila University of Helsinki
Herbert Weingartner
Herbert Weingartner National Institutes of Health
Peter Roy-Byrne
Peter Roy-Byrne University of Washington
Allen D. Radant
Allen D. Radant University of Washington
Judith L. Rapoport
Judith L. Rapoport National Institutes of Health

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Daniel W. Hommer

Recently Published Articles