World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
42
Citations
14360
World Ranking
7380
National Ranking
3983

Goldine C. Gleser publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Goldine C. Gleser sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 108 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Goldine C. Gleser D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Goldine C. Gleser sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 42 D-Index — 36th percentile

36% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Goldine C. Gleser was affiliated with the University of Cincinnati Medical Center in the United States. During their career, they conducted research contributing to their field, though specific details regarding the main fields of study, subfields, and research topics are not documented here.

There are no recorded recent papers, frequent co-authors, or publication venues related to their work in the available data. Similarly, no book publications or awards have been noted.

This profile reflects the available data as of now and refrains from speculation beyond the recorded facts.

Best Publications

  • The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles

    Philip R. Merrifield;Lee J. Cronbach;Goldine C. Gleser;Harinder Nanda

  • Assessing similarity between profiles.

    Lee J. Cronbach;Goldine C. Gleser

  • THEORY OF GENERALIZABILITY: A LIBERALIZATION OF RELIABILITY THEORY†

    Lee J. Cronbach;Nageswari Rajaratnam;Goldine C. Gleser

  • Children and disaster: age, gender, and parental effects on PTSD symptoms.

    Bonnie L. Green;Mindy Korol;Mary C. Grace;Marshall G. Vary

  • The measurement of psychological states through the content analysis of verbal behavior

    Louis A. Gottschalk;Goldine C. Gleser

  • An objective instrument for measuring defense mechanisms.

    Goldine C. Gleser;David Ihilevich

  • Buffalo Creek survivors in the second decade: stability of stress symptoms.

    Bonnie L. Green;Jacob D. Lindy;Mary C. Grace;Goldine C. Gleser

  • Psychological tests and personnel decisions

    Lee J. Cronbach;Goldine C. Gleser

  • Risk factors for PTSD and other diagnoses in a general sample of Vietnam veterans.

    Bonnie L. Green;Mary C. Grace;Jacob D. Lindy;Goldine C. Gleser

  • Children of Disaster in the Second Decade: A 17-Year Follow-up of Buffalo Creek Survivors

    Bonnie L. Green;Mary C. Grace;Marshall G. Vary;Teresa L. Kramer

  • The effect of ageing on stature.

    Mildred Trotter;Goldine Gleser

  • Identifying Survivors at Risk: Long-Term Impairment Following the Beverly Hills Supper Club Fire.

    Bonnie L. Green;Mary C. Grace;Goldine C. Gleser

  • Manual of Instructions for Using the Gottschalk-Gleser Content Analysis Scales: Anxiety, Hostility and Social Alienation - Personal Disorganization

    Louis A. Gottschalk;Carolyn N. Winget;Goldine C. Gleser

  • Generalizability of scores influenced by multiple sources of variance.

    Goldine C. Gleser;Lee J. Cronbach;Nageswari Rajaratnam

  • Multiple diagnosis in posttraumatic stress disorder. The role of war stressors

    Bonnie L. Green;Jacob D. Lindy;Mary C. Grace;Goldine C. Gleser

  • Manual of Instructions for Using the Gottschalk-Gleser Content Analysis Scales

    Louis A. Gottschalk;Carolyn N. Winget;Goldine C. Gleser

  • Evaluation of convulsive and subconvulsive shock therapies utilizing a control group.

    George A. Ulett;Kathleen Smith;Goldine C. Gleser

  • Three hostility scales applicable to verbal samples.

    Louis A. Gottschalk;Goldine C. Gleser;Kayla J. Springer

  • Abstinence and normal drinking. An assessment of changes in drinking patterns in alcoholics after treatment.

    Pattison Em;Headley Eb;Gleser Gc;Gottschalk La

  • The Dependability of Behavioral Measurements: Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profiles.

    Donald B. Rubin;Lee J. Cronbach;Goldine C. Gleser;Harinder Nanda

Frequent Co-Authors

Louis A. Gottschalk
Louis A. Gottschalk University of California, Irvine
Lee J. Cronbach
Lee J. Cronbach Stanford University
Joel S. Warm
Joel S. Warm United States Air Force Research Laboratory
Paul Karoly
Paul Karoly Arizona State University
Richard J. Shavelson
Richard J. Shavelson Stanford University
George Winokur
George Winokur University of Iowa
Max Fink
Max Fink Stony Brook University
Donald B. Rubin
Donald B. Rubin Temple University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online psychology degrees can offer significant flexibility and affordability for students in the USA. Many accredited universities now provide online programs, allowing you to balance your studies with personal or professional commitments. These pathways make it possible to pursue advanced qualifications no matter where you are located.

When considering your options, affordability is crucial. Fortunately, various states offer cost-effective programs. You can review the cheapest online psychology master's degrees in California if you are seeking West Coast options. For those in the Southeast, the most affordable online master's psychology degree programs in Florida present practical choices.

Students based in the Northeast can explore the cheapest online psychology master's programs in New York to find good value. Meanwhile, the cheapest online psychology master's programs in Texas are ideal for those in the South or Southwest.

Graduates of online psychology degrees can pursue diverse careers in counseling, human resources, research, education, and healthcare. Online programs equip you with the knowledge and skills necessary to make a meaningful impact in these growing fields.

Best Scientists Citing Goldine C. Gleser